Kapor Center http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress For Social Impact Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:26:42 +0000 en-US 1.2 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress 21 3 23 11 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.3 Oakland Local: Startup Weekend Black Male Achievement - Some photos http://oaklandlocal.com/2014/02/startup-weekend-black-male-achievement-some-photos/ Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:12:51 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6817 Startup Weekend Black Male Achievement (SWOBMA). Van Jones gave the keynote at Saturday’s evening reception and shared his vision for Rebuild The Dream’s latest program, #YesWeCode, a major initiative to help train 100,000 low-opportunity youth become the next generation of world-class computer programmers. Read the full article at Oakland Local »]]> 6817 0 0 0 How to Start: Living In America w/ Jose Antonio Vargas http://startism.net/2014/02/13/3-living-in-america-w-jose-antonio-vargas/ Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:15:38 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6820 New York Times Magazine, in which he came out as what so many have called “an illegal.” The spread was called “OUTLAW.” Listen to the interview here »]]> 6820 0 0 0 SF Chronicle: Obama Brother's Keeper program inspired by Oakland project http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/sf-chronicle-obama-brothers-keeper-program-inspired-by-oakland-project/ Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:17:59 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6823 By Joe Garofoli in the San Francisco Chronicle President Obama, backed by $200 million in philanthropic pledges, launched a new program Wednesday aimed at helping young men of color succeed in school and the job market - and some of its inspiration came from a program already in place in Oakland. The new My Brother's Keeper program is designed to reverse a national trend in which young men of color are six times as likely to be murdered as whites. The disparities are just as stark in the classroom, where 86 percent of African American fourth-grade boys and 82 percent of their Latino classmates are reading below proficiency levels, compared with white boys at 54 percent, according to the White House.]]> 6823 0 0 0 NPR: Do Tech Startups Need More Diversity? http://www.npr.org/2014/02/26/282927327/do-tech-startups-need-more-soul Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:20:06 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6826 Listen to the story here »]]> 6826 0 0 0 SF Chronicle: Oakland hackathon tries to broaden Silicon Valley’s recruitment pipeline http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/item/Does-not-compute-27163.php Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:23:31 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6829 By Joe Garofoli in the San Francisco Chronicle » Silicon Valley touts itself as a meritocracy where people climb the economic ladder based on the power of their ideas. But many people of color can't even find that ladder, let alone climb it. They're not part of the valley's white-male-dominated "bro culture," advocates say, and aren't connected to the social and educational networks where companies recruit talent. "Shame on Silicon Valley, but shame on the rest of us, too," said Van Jones, a former veteran Bay Area activist and current co-host of CNN's "Crossfire." His Oakland nonprofit, Rebuild the Dream, is one of the driving forces behind Start-Up Weekend Oakland, which begins Friday at the Impact Hub Oakland. More than 300 participants are expected to take part in a hackathon with an overriding theme of driving more African Americans and Latinos into the tech world's recruitment pipeline.

Read the full piece in the San Francisco Chronicle »

]]>
6829 0 0 0
New York Times: Released From Prison, and Starting a Company http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/07/business/smallbusiness/released-from-prison-and-starting-a-company.html?_r=1& Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:26:43 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6832 By DONNA FENN in the New York Times
Like most entrepreneurs, Frederick Hutson cannot resist trying to solve a thorny problem. His company, Pigeonly, based in Las Vegas, taps an underserved and “captive” market by offering prison inmates an easy and efficient way to receive photos from loved ones and to make phone calls to them inexpensively. “Isolation is the worst thing for an inmate,” Mr. Hutson said. “It makes it hard for him to rebuild his life when he gets out.”
At a San Francisco accelerator, Mr. Hutson, a former prison inmate, found skepticism about the market he wanted to reach. But his mentors came around.
Hoping to reduce recidivism, he came up with an idea for an online platform, called Fotopigeon, that lets friends and relatives upload photos, which are then sent through the postal service directly to the incarcerated for a flat fee of 50 cents a print. “Companies like Shutterfly and Snapfish — their packaging won’t get accepted by prisons,” Mr. Hutson said, “because they don’t like anything that doesn’t come in a plain white envelope.” Mr. Hutson knows his market well. In October 2007, when he was 24, he was deeply immersed in solving a different business problem — the inefficient distribution of marijuana from Mexico to Florida — when 10 Drug Enforcement Agency officers showed up at his mail store in Las Vegas with guns drawn. Mr. Hutson had been moving marijuana through his business, using DHL, UPS and FedEx trucks to transport it to Florida. With no previous criminal record and an honorable discharge from the Air Force, which he entered directly after graduating from high school, Mr. Hutson expected to get off with a “slap on the wrist.” Instead, he was sentenced to 51 months in prison. Read the full article in the New York Times »]]>
6832 0 0 0
Women 2.0: Announcing the Kapor Capital Recipients http://women2.com/announcing-ten-kapor-capital-recipients/ Fri, 25 Oct 2013 05:29:14 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6835  By Jessica Schimm on Women 2.0 Oakland-based investment fund Kapor Capital invests in seed stage information technology companies to generate economic value and positive social impact. This month, they contributed ten scholarships for entrepreneurial women of color to attend the upcoming Women 2.0 Conference in Las Vegas November 14 & 15. We are excited to have them join us! Here is a little more about the recipients. Read the full piece on Women 2.0 »]]> 6835 0 0 0 Women 2.0: Kapor Capital is Sponsoring 10 Scholarship Tickets to the Women 2.0 Conference http://women2.com/sponsored-kapor-capital-sponsoring-10-scholarship-tickets-women-2-0-conference/ Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:31:46 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6838

By Sepideh Nasiri on Women 2.0

To generate economic value and positive social impact, Oakland-based investment fund Kapor Capital invests in human capital. Today, Kapor Capital will be funding 10 conference passes – to be awarded to women of color – to attend the upcoming Women 2.0 Conference  on November 14 – 15 in Las Vegas.

Kapor Capital is sponsoring ten scholarships for women of color who are otherwise financially unable to attend Women 2.0′s 2013 Las Vegas conference on November 14 – 15. Attendees will get the opportunity to not only learn and hear from successful women executives and founders of technology companies but will also get a chance to network in an intimate environment with fellow entrepreneurs, investors and technologists.

Conference highlights include a wearable tech fashion show, featuring pieces from the most cutting edge names in fashion tech, panels from a range of highly accomplished women across tech industries, the opening launch of Founder Friday Las Vegas and an intimate concert with famed artist, Congo Sanchez from Thievery Corporation. Apply for a scholarship to attend the Women 2.0 Conference on November 14 – 15, 2013 in Las Vegas.

Read full piece on Women 2.0 »

]]>
6838 0 0 0
Haas Now: New Institute for Business and Social Impact to Launch with Distinguished Alumni Panel http://newsroom.haas.berkeley.edu/article/new-institute-business-and-social-impact-launch-distinguished-alumni-panel Mon, 14 Oct 2013 04:33:26 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6841 The Haas School will launch a new Institute for Business and Social Impact Wednesday, Nov. 6, with a panel discussion among five alumni who have built outstanding careers with significant social impact. The event will run from noon until 2 p.m. in the Wells Fargo Room. Registration is required at http://haas.org/16SgEbf. Professor and former Haas Dean Laura Tyson will lead the new institute, whose goal is to inspire and empower members of the Haas community to develop pioneering solutions for pressing social and environmental challenges. "If there’s anyone who can lead the way in bridging business, government and the civic sector to find solutions to our society's toughest problems, it's Laura Tyson," says Dean Rich Lyons. "We are delighted that she will be taking the lead in bringing together several units to accomplish this audacious goal." The Institute will encompass  four existing centers and programs of the Haas School: the Center for Nonprofit and Public Leadership; the Center for Responsible Business; the Graduate Program in Health Management, and the Global Social Venture Competition, which was founded by Berkeley MBA students and is hosted by the Haas School's Lester Center for Entrepreneurship. In addition, the institute plans to launch a new gender parity initiative and othe rprograms related to its mission. Read the full piece » ]]> 6841 0 0 0 All Things Digital: The Coding Class Blitz: More Than 100 Programs Have Launched in the Past Three Years http://allthingsd.com/20131007/the-coding-class-blitz-more-than-100-programs-have-launched-in-the-past-three-years/# Tue, 08 Oct 2013 05:39:44 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage&p=6848 By Liz Gannes on All Things Digital Teaching computer science is a mostly un-institutional effort; it’s estimated that nine out of 10 U.S. schools don’t offer programming classes, despite the growing importance and hirability of skilled coders. But many extracurricular programs have emerged to try to fill that gap for students of all ages. Out of something like 300 publicly available programs, 108 were started in the past three years. That’s according to a new report released today by the Kapor Center, the social-impact-focused outfit from Lotus founder Mitch Kapor and organizational culture advocate Freada Kapor Klein. The Kapor Center hopes to add to its list by offering it up to the public as a Google Doc. So far, it has 316 programs, including bootcamps, trainings that offer certifications and credentials, employee training courses and hackathons. Most of those are in the U.S. Of the current list, 63 are focused on women and girls, and 32 aim to work with historically underrepresented populations, the report said. Read the full piece »]]> 6848 0 0 0 Associated Press: Former NAACP President Moves to Venture Capital http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/associated-press-former-naacp-president-moves-to-venture-capital/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:16:55 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6869 By MARTHA MENDOZA AP National Writer Just months after stepping down as head of the nation's largest civil rights organization, former NAACP President Benjamin Jealous is changing his career from an East Coast political activist to a West Coast venture capitalist, a switch he hopes will help further his goal of growing opportunities for blacks and Latinos in the booming tech economy. "My life's mission has been leveling the playing field and closing gaps in opportunity and success," Jealous, 41, told The Associated Press before Tuesday's announcement. "I'm excited about trying a different approach."

The Northern California native and self-confessed computer geek will be joining entrepreneurs Mitchell Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein at their venture capital investment firm that backs information technology startups committed to making a positive social impact.

Fred Turner, who studies culture and technology as an associate professor at Stanford University, said it's "fascinating that a person of his caliber and experience would move into this space."

Turner said there's a deep question going on in the U.S. about how to accomplish positive social change.

"In the Silicon Valley they approach it entrepreneurially, in Washington they approach it politically," Turner said. "These are two very different modes."

Jealous said he and his family will remain in Silver Spring, Md., but he'll commute to the West Coast about once a month.

Jealous, who was widely credited with improving the NAACP's finances, donor base and outreach, said he will never completely drop out of politics.

"It's in my DNA," he said.

He declined to specify his new salary but said it was about the same as it was at the NAACP — $285,000 in 2011, according to tax forms.

When he announced his departure from the organization in September 2013, Jealous said he planned to pursue university teaching and spend time with his young family. But Jealous says the opportunity to work with Kapor Capital was just too tempting, putting him on the cutting edge of helping people who are slipping further behind as the national economy grows.

The divide is greater in the Silicon Valley than the rest of the country. Blacks and Latinos, already earning about half as much as whites and Asians, saw per capita income drop 5 percent for blacks in the past two years, and 2 percent for Latinos, according to an annual Silicon Valley Index.

The disparity is clear when it comes to jobs as well. Just 4 percent of the nation's 1.1 million software developers are black, and 5 percent are Latino, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

"The Silicon Valley holds itself up as a meritocracy, but it's actually embarrassingly un-diverse," said Freada Kapor Klein. "We expect Ben is going to help us change that."

Kapor Capital's portfolio currently has 46 percent of its investments in firms with founders who are women and people of color from an underrepresented background.

Mitch Kapor said Jealous' ability and understanding about how to make a social impact will be a huge asset to the firm's investment goals.

Kapor said he looks for companies that are "closing gaps of access and opportunity for underserved communities or involve a disruptive democratization of a sector."

These include Pigeon.ly, a startup that offers low-cost phone and photo sharing for prisoners and their families outside, and Regalii, an international remittance platform that helps immigrants send money to their families in Latin America.

Silicon Valley Community Foundation President Emmett Carson said the region attracts great talent, and Jealous "will blend human rights and entrepreneurship in an effective way."

Jealous grew up in Pacific Grove, about 100 miles from the Silicon Valley, during the pivotal years when personal computing was just starting to gain traction. He was captivated and chose a long commute, on foot and by bus, to attend a magnet school for computer science.

For his new job, Jealous said he's going to be getting a crash course in technology, investing and even software coding.

"I'm going to have a computer coding tutor for the first time since I was in fifth grade," he said.

]]>
6869 0 0 0
The Root: How the Kapor Center Serves as Our Brothers’ and Sisters’ Keeper http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/the-root-how-the-kapor-center-serves-as-our-brothers-and-sisters-keeper/ Thu, 06 Mar 2014 20:55:06 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6918 TheRoot.com Cedric Brown sat three chairs down from President Barack Obama as he announced his My Brother’s Keeper initiative last week. But more importantly, moving forward, is that Brown has a seat at the table as the White House tackles the persistent crisis of young men of color in America.
Cedric and his colleague Nicole Sanchez are managing partners at the Kapor Center for Social Impact, based in Oakland, Calif. He and his colleagues have a clear grasp of what it will take to level the playing field for young men of color, and it is encouraging that President Obama believes in them, too.
For two decades, Cedric has embodied the ethos of My Brother’s Keeper. A former school counselor, he co-founded the College Bound Brotherhood, a network of organizations that seeks to widen the pathway for African-American young men entering college. At the Kapor Center, he invests in programs that close gaps in opportunity and success.
A foundational principle of his work is that any plan to help young men of color has to involve a dual strategy. Personal responsibility is important, but there must be mechanisms in place to make sure that personal responsibility is enough.
“Personal responsibility is key,” he told me. “But every young man who works hard should have the opportunity to succeed. It can’t all be on their backs. It is up to us to change public policy and perceptions that end up cramping these young men’s ability. The answer has to involve both individuals and institutions.”
The Kapor Center is one of those institutions. The team that Mitch Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein have assembled is focused on advancing social justice by any means that work. The Center has injected millions of dollars into programs like the College Bound Brotherhood and the Level Playing Field Institute, which works to eliminate the barriers faced by underrepresented people of color in the crucial “STEM” fields: science, technology, engineering and math.
On the business side, Kapor Capital makes seed-stage investments in gap-closing startups, like Pigeonly, which helps inmates communicate with family outside, or UniversityNow, which seeks to make college accessible and ultimately debt-free.
The idea of serving as our brothers’ and sisters’ keepers is central to the Kapor Center culture. Our Oakland headquarters is filled with people who believe that race should not be a barrier to success, and who want to create circumstances that allow people to take control of their own destiny.
As Cedric told me, “We have to be responsible for other people even if they don’t look like us, or act like us. We are all in this together. All people need to be valued.”
It is that spirit that Cedric brought with him to the White House last week, and it is that spirit that has attracted me to join the Kapor Center and Kapor Capital teams.]]>
6918 0 0 0
SF Chronicle: Former NAACP President Ben Jealous coming to Silicon Valley http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/sf-chronicle-former-naacp-president-ben-jealous-coming-to-silicon-valley/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:16:09 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6932 Written by Joe Garofoli in the San Francisco Chronicle Silicon Valley's newest venture capitalist has social media experience - and a social justice background. Benjamin Jealous, the former NAACP president responsible for turning around the flagging civil rights institution, will join an Oakland venture capital firm dedicated to socially conscious investing. His assignment as a venture partner with Kapor Capital and the Kapor Center for Social Impact: create a freeway to the tech world from poor communities of color where now there is little more than a trail. Only 6 percent of U.S. tech workers are African American and 7 percent are Latino; 15 percent are Asian American and 71 percent are non-Hispanic white, according to 2011 census data. Jealous, a former Alameda resident who revived the 105-year-old NAACP during his tenure that ended in December, is a lifelong activist with no tech or venture capital experience. But his bosses, Silicon Valley pioneer Mitch Kapor and his wife, Freada Kapor Klein, wanted someone with experience outside the tech world. They know that after six years at the front lines of politics and activism, the 41-year-old Rhodes Scholar has tight contacts with Fortune 500 companies, union leaders and community activists and is young enough to relate to the startup community.

Great organizer

"There's nobody else in the world who can organize coalitions like Ben," said Kapor Klein, who has been friends with Jealous for more than a decade. Case in point: In 2011, Jealous pulled her left-leaning husband into a national prison reform effort with conservative antitax activist Grover Norquist. While Jealous doesn't have a business background, "the turnaround he did at the NAACP," Kapor Klein said, "rivals anything that's been done in the corporate world." At 35, Jealous was the youngest leader in the NAACP's history. When he took over the storied organization it was politically peripheral and financially shaky, with a dwindling donor base, poor leadership and virtually no social media presence to connect with the post-civil rights era generation. When Jealous left in December, annual revenue had almost doubled to $46 million and the donor base had grown nearly tenfold to more than 132,000. He bolstered the organization's social media and digital contact list to rival the best in the nonprofit world - enough for Fortune magazine to name Jealous to its annual "40 Under 40" list in 2012. "It's really a 'wow' announcement," said Robert Ross, president and CEO of the California Endowment, which last year pledged to invest $50 million over the next seven years to help young men of color in California academically. "To have a renowned, noted civil rights warrior advocating for the future of young people in a visible Silicon Valley role is really extraordinary. You could have asked me 100 possible job possibilities for Ben Jealous when he left the NAACP and that wouldn't have been on the list," Ross said.

Tackling 'social problems'

Kapor Capital's hiring of Jealous - who will be based in Washington, D.C. - is another sign of frustration with the federal government's ability to address social problems. Last week President Obama, backed by $200 million in philanthropic pledges and business support (including backing from the Kapors), launched a new program, My Brother's Keeper, to help young men of color succeed in school and the job market. "In the era of gridlock," Kapor Klein said, "some of the old methodologies of how you get social change accomplished are at best stalled - at worst dead. So we are using the best of startup culture and applying it to intractable social problems." Quietly, Jealous' interest in the business world has grown. For years, often after NAACP fundraisers at the Kapors' summer home in Martha's Vineyard, the couple and Jealous would talk about "how there should be more connection between the business world of innovation and the civil rights world," Kapor Klein said.
Silicon Valley's newest venture capitalist has social media experience - and a social justice background. Benjamin Jealous, the former NAACP president responsible for turning around the flagging civil rights institution, will join an Oakland venture capital firm dedicated to socially conscious investing. His assignment as a venture partner with Kapor Capital and the Kapor Center for Social Impact: create a freeway to the tech world from poor communities of color where now there is little more than a trail. Only 6 percent of U.S. tech workers are African American and 7 percent are Latino; 15 percent are Asian American and 71 percent are non-Hispanic white, according to 2011 census data. Jealous, a former Alameda resident who revived the 105-year-old NAACP during his tenure that ended in December, is a lifelong activist with no tech or venture capital experience. But his bosses, Silicon Valley pioneer Mitch Kapor and his wife, Freada Kapor Klein, wanted someone with experience outside the tech world. They know that after six years at the front lines of politics and activism, the 41-year-old Rhodes Scholar has tight contacts with Fortune 500 companies, union leaders and community activists and is young enough to relate to the startup community.

Great organizer

"There's nobody else in the world who can organize coalitions like Ben," said Kapor Klein, who has been friends with Jealous for more than a decade. Case in point: In 2011, Jealous pulled her left-leaning husband into a national prison reform effort with conservative antitax activist Grover Norquist. While Jealous doesn't have a business background, "the turnaround he did at the NAACP," Kapor Klein said, "rivals anything that's been done in the corporate world." At 35, Jealous was the youngest leader in the NAACP's history. When he took over the storied organization it was politically peripheral and financially shaky, with a dwindling donor base, poor leadership and virtually no social media presence to connect with the post-civil rights era generation. When Jealous left in December, annual revenue had almost doubled to $46 million and the donor base had grown nearly tenfold to more than 132,000. He bolstered the organization's social media and digital contact list to rival the best in the nonprofit world - enough for Fortune magazine to name Jealous to its annual "40 Under 40" list in 2012. "It's really a 'wow' announcement," said Robert Ross, president and CEO of the California Endowment, which last year pledged to invest $50 million over the next seven years to help young men of color in California academically. "To have a renowned, noted civil rights warrior advocating for the future of young people in a visible Silicon Valley role is really extraordinary. You could have asked me 100 possible job possibilities for Ben Jealous when he left the NAACP and that wouldn't have been on the list," Ross said.

Tackling 'social problems'

Kapor Capital's hiring of Jealous - who will be based in Washington, D.C. - is another sign of frustration with the federal government's ability to address social problems. Last week President Obama, backed by $200 million in philanthropic pledges and business support (including backing from the Kapors), launched a new program, My Brother's Keeper, to help young men of color succeed in school and the job market. "In the era of gridlock," Kapor Klein said, "some of the old methodologies of how you get social change accomplished are at best stalled - at worst dead. So we are using the best of startup culture and applying it to intractable social problems." Quietly, Jealous' interest in the business world has grown. For years, often after NAACP fundraisers at the Kapors' summer home in Martha's Vineyard, the couple and Jealous would talk about "how there should be more connection between the business world of innovation and the civil rights world," Kapor Klein said.
]]>
6932 0 0 0
North Dallas Gazette: From NNPA to NAACP to Silicon Valley – Ben Jealous Still Pushing Technology for Equality http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/north-dallas-gazette-from-nnpa-to-naacp-to-silicon-valley-ben-jealous-still-pushing-technology-for-equality/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:21:28 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6935 North Dallas Gazette (TriceEdneyWire.com) – Benjamin Todd Jealous, the former NAACP president, who has weaved a career through politics, the Black press and civil rights, has now announced his next course of action in pursuit of racial equality and economic justice in America. Jealous and the Oakland, Calif.-based Kapor Center for Social Impact, located in the billionaire- Silicon Valley announced this week that he has joined the Center as its first venture partner. The center’s co-founders and co-chairs Mitchell Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein are bringing Jealous on to find tech-savvy entrepreneurs and inventors with ideas for using technology for social impact, mainly to fill racial and economic gaps in America. Jealous will help find the entrepreneurs, help them shape their tech visions; plus establish the selection criteria for possible seed money. He will also help lead the center’s effort to make investments in non-profit organizations that are about closing social gaps and will join the board of the Kapor Center-funded Level Playing Field Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to ending racial barriers in science, technology, engineering and math. “I’ve always been interested in technology. I’ve always been interested in [deepening] the social impact. And I’ve always been very curious about ways to use technology to advance the social impact,” Jealous said in an interview this week. “When Mitch and Frieda came forth and offered me the opportunity to join the Kapor Center for Social Impact and start trying new things every day…while still staying focused on achieving my life’s mission of and leveling the playing field and closing gaps to access and opportunity in our community and the country as a whole, I leapt at it because it had been a long time since I’d tried something new that had the potential to level the playing field for hundreds of thousands and millions of people.” Jealous says one of his first stops will be a learning tour of Silicon Valley, the South Bay portion of San Francisco, which leads the nation in cutting edge technology. The Kapor Center has a program for underrepresented college students to get paid internships in Silicon Valley companies. Jealous, who dates his keen interest in technology back to a fourth and fifth grade computer science program, served as president/CEO of the NAACP for five years until his resignation late last year. There, his leadership in technology grew NAACP’s mobile messaging base from 5,000 activists to 423,000 and from 175,000 email activists to 1.3 million. Jealous’ technological skills also harken back to when he started as executive director of the 200-member National Newspaper Publishers Association in 2000 with a vision of bringing the Black Press on line with websites and a full-service news service for its members. Before his departure almost half of NNPA’s newspapers were on line and the wire service continues to thrive. Jealous’ record of using technology to fight for racial justice is what established the mutual attraction between him and the Kapor Center. “Ben has spent his career working to end racial and economic gaps in society, from the criminal justice system to education to health care,” said co-founder Freada Kapor Klein in a statement. “We are tremendously pleased that he will bring his vast experience, strategy and energy to the tech sector as the next frontier in his life’s work for justice and inclusion.” Jealous’ civil rights career is just as important as his tech interest said co-founder Mitchell Kapor, one of the first Silicon Valley billionaires. “As an entrepreneur and an investor, I’ve built my career on seeing the possibilities of good ideas and the right team, and then bringing that vision to life. By bringing Ben to the Kapor team, we are making a bet that someone who has succeeded in changing the broader world in so many ways will do the same in our world.” When Jealous left the NAACP last year, he said he would spend more time with his growing family and would also work to start a political action committee (PAC) for transformative Democratic and Republican candidates. He said this week that he will continue to do it all. “I will reserve a portion of my time continuing my work in politics. This will be 80 percent of my time and 20 percent will be continuing to build the PAC,” he said. “It’ll be separate and ongoing work.” As for his family, Jealous says he will remain bi-coastal, primarily living in Maryland with his family even as he travels for the Kapor Center. The Center has already made major strides in its quest for social justice. Jealous ticked off a list of ideas, aps and inventions as examples that have already received funding. They include technology that lowers the astronomical cost of telephone calls from inmates to their families; a blue tooth hearing aid that costs only $75 instead of the normal $3,000-$5,000; technology that helps parents and children with bi-lingual education; a way to send money home to another country without paying a 30 percent remittance fee; and a way to make college education available for the cost of a Pell grant. “So, that’s what we’re talking about here…Very similar to my work at the NAACP. We’re working on multiple gaps simultaneously,” Jealous said. “It’s impossible not to be excited.”]]> 6935 0 0 0 The Root: Ben Jealous Continues His Civil Rights Fight ‘by Any Means That Works’ http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/the-root-ben-jealous-continues-his-civil-rights-fight-by-any-means-that-works/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:25:04 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6938 By The Root staff Benjamin Jealous left the NAACP in January, but, he says, he plans to “stay on track with my life’s mission of leveling the playing field in this country.” And in the next phase of his career—as a venture partner at the Kapor Center for Social Impact—he’ll be focused on “trying new ways” to expand opportunities for young black and Latino students and entrepreneurs. Jealous—who became the youngest-ever president and CEO of the nation’s best-known civil rights organization when he took over at the end of 2008—is moving on, but he’s clear about what his legacy is at the NAACP. Brought in to bring the association into the digital age and get “engaged online in a serious way,” Jealous says that under his leadership, the NAACP “went from less than 200,000 to more than 2 million digital activists.” He believes that “in any type of battle,” including ongoing civil rights struggles, “the ability to get the resources to the front line is really what makes or breaks your success.” And to that end, he says, in five years the association was able to “massively expand” its donor base. Going forward, Jealous says, “restoring Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act” will be the NAACP’s top priority, but it’s one they’ll have to take on without him, because he’s already beginning a new chapter at Kapor. The center invests in tech companies that aim to narrow the divide in educational and entrepreneurial opportunities for African Americans and Latinos, particularly in the information technology sector. When asked if part of the motivation for his next move was a sense that civil rights was migrating away from a government focus—particularly in light of President Barack Obama’s new emphasis on public-private partnerships like his My Brother’s Keeper initiative—Jealous suggested that his is a “‘both-and’ generation” of civil rights leaders who have “stayed in the groove of ‘We shall overcome’” and “resisted the temptation of ‘I shall overcome,’” and have “understood implicitly that we have to be willing” to address civil rights challenges “by any means that work.” That includes My Brother’s Keeper, of which the Kapor Center is a sponsor. He’ll be working now to “diversify the start-up culture of the Silicon Valley by any means,” including efforts like Kapor’s sponsorship of “hack-athons” that provide experience for elementary and middle schools students who want to enhance their computer-programming skills and its funding of University Now, a program designed to ease the cost burden of tuition for minority students seeking advanced degrees. The Kapor Center also works with start-ups like Pigeon.ly, a service that provides lower-cost digital communication between prison inmates and their families, and Regalii, another service that allows immigrant families to digitally pay bills for their families in their home countries. The goal, says Jealous, is to provide seed investments for “disruptive technologies that promise to have a positive social impact” and “close gaps in access, opportunity and participation” for African Americans and Latinos in the start-up economy. Jealous says he’s looking forward to being part of “a diverse team of geniuses who are all focused on large-scale social problems.” When he was growing up in Northern California, Jealous says, he was “the only black kid on a desegregation bus on the way from Monterey to Seaside,” riding several hours every day to a magnet school for up-and-coming computer scientists. But as he got older, his career took him into civil rights, politics and journalism—including a stint as the executive director of the National Newspaper Publishers Association, a syndication service for traditional African-American print media, where he helped bring black newspapers online. And now he’s come full circle to the tech field. His opportunity with Kapor, says Jealous, “speaks to that boy in me” who rode the bus to the magnet school, and “feeds the curious geek in me” who embraces technology and wants to help widen the embrace of technology in his community.]]> 6938 0 0 0 SF Business Times: Ex-NAACP head now a Kapor Center partner http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/sf-business-times-ex-naacp-head-now-a-kapor-center-partner/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:29:20 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6941 SF Business Times Former NAACP president and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous has become a partner at the Kapor Center for Social Impact in Oakland, where he will work on both for-profit investments and non-profit activities. Jealous ran the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People until December. In addition to being a partner at Kapor Capital, he will also join the board of directors of the Kapor Center-funded Level Playing Field Institute, a non-profit that aims to eliminate barriers faced by people of color in science, technology, engineering and math. Co-founded by software magnate Mitchell Kapor, who previously founded the Lotus Development Corp., the Kapor Center for Social Impact promotes education, supports startups run by women and racial and ethnic minorities and backs entrepreneurs with businesses that seek to "close gaps" in education, healthcare and other areas. Before taking the top job at the NAACP in 2008, Jealous was president of the San Francisco-based Rosenberg Foundation, director of Amnesty International's U.S. domestic human rights program and executive director of the National Newspaper Publishers Association. Jealous graduated from Oxford University with an M.S. in comparative social research and from Columbia University with a B.A. in political science.]]> 6941 0 0 0 Baltimore Sun: Former NAACP CEO Benjamin Jealous to join West Coast venture capital firm http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/baltimore-sun-former-naacp-ceo-benjamin-jealous-to-join-west-coast-venture-capital-firm/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:33:30 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6944 Kapor Capital backs firms with positive social impact By Lorraine Mirabella in The Baltimore Sun Former NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Jealous, who stepped down in December, is joining a West Coast venture capital firm specializing in startups that diversify the tech industry and aim to have a positive social impact. Jealous, who will continue to reside in Silver Spring, will become a partner in the Kapor Center for Social Impact, joining entrepreneurs and center co-founders Mitchell Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein, the center said Tuesday. Kapor, which backs firms through its investment arm, Kapor Capital, works to close gaps in access, opportunity, wealth and participation. "I am proud to continue working on those issues with them," Jealous said in the announcement. Jealous, who stepped in as National Association for the Advancement of Colored People president in 2008, is credited with reenergizing the nation's oldest and largest civil rights organization. He helped lead state and local movements to ban the death penalty, outlaw racial profiling and win marriage equality.]]> 6944 0 0 0 Upstart Business Journal: Former NAACP head turns VC, plans to boost minority entrepreneurs http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/upstart-business-journal-former-naacp-head-turns-vc-plans-to-boost-minority-entrepreneurs/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:36:53 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6948 Upstart Business Journal Benjamin Jealous, credited with turning around the NAACP while head of the civil rights organization, plans to take his fight for social justice to California as a venture capitalist. Jealous is joining Kapor Capital of Oakland. His job, to find and help fund startups led by African American and Latino entrepreneurs. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Jealous' new bosses, Silicon Valley pioneer Mitch Kapor and his wife Freada Kapor Klein, were looking for a talent like Jealous when it came to beefing up that effort. Here's the Chronicle:
They know that after six years at the front lines of politics and activism, the 41-year-old Rhodes Scholar has tight contacts with Fortune 500 companies, union leaders and community activists and is young enough to relate to the startup community. "There's nobody else in the world who can organize coalitions like Ben," said Kapor Klein, who has been friends with Jealous for more than a decade. Case in point: In 2011, Jealous pulled her left-leaning husband into a national prison reform effort with conservative antitax activist Grover Norquist. While Jealous doesn't have a business background, "the turnaround he did at the NAACP," Kapor Klein said, "rivals anything that's been done in the corporate world."
Jealous took over the NAACP at age 35, the youngest-ever person to lead the civil rights organization. While there, he ushered it into the digital age, doubling revenue to $46 million and growing its donor base ten-fold. When he left the NAACP in January, Jealous spoke of teaching and spending time with his young family. But the lure of Silicon Valley is strong, especially for someone looking to change the world. The Root reports:
He’ll be working now to “diversify the start-up culture of the Silicon Valley by any means,” including efforts like Kapor’s sponsorship of “hack-athons” that provide experience for elementary and middle schools students who want to enhance their computer-programming skills and its funding of University Now, a program designed to ease the cost burden of tuition for minority students seeking advanced degrees.
Jealous told the Associated Press, "My life's mission has been leveling the playing field and closing gaps in opportunity and success. I'm excited about trying a different approach."]]>
6948 0 0 0
Daily Caller: Former NAACP head joins venture capitalist firm in California http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/daily-caller-former-naacp-head-joins-venture-capitalist-firm-in-california/ Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:40:16 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6951 6951 0 0 0 WHY OAKLAND’S A TECH START-UP GAME CHANGER http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7133 Mon, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7133 7133 0 0 0 Forbes: Mitch Kapor's Next Killer App - Latino Entrepreneurship http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/forbes-mitch-kapors-next-killer-app-latino-entrepreneurship/ Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:50:51 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6915 Forbes.com @giorodriguez Kapor’s “Latin@s in Tech” was one of the best pre-events this year at SxSW Interactive.  Here’s why. History lesson for the young-un’s:  Lotus 1-2-3 was the first “killer app” for the age of the PC, and Mitch Kapor was the founder.  Since that time (the early 80s), he’s done a lot of other things.  And I am old enough to have followed his progress and his projects.  But it’s his latest project — the Kapor Center For Social Impact — that impresses me the most.  It may be, in fact, his next killer app — and this one for the age of multicultural entrepreneurship. Kapor’s new enterprise first caught my attention in 2013.  The Latino tech marketplace is one of my beats, and I discovered that the Center had begun investing in Latino entrepreneurs.  And investing in Latino entrepreneur events.  The latest event happened yesterday, on the eve of SxSW Interactive.  I was there this year just for pre-events, and took the opportunity to reflect on why Kapor’s support for Latinos and other ethnic groups is getting such a strong response. The event yesterday was sold out.  And it drew people from the Latinosphere who had never traveled to Austin before. Empathy First, as Kapor noted in a post-lunch discussion, there’s been a shocking lack of “empathy” for ethnic entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley.  It’s an interesting choice of words.  What Kapor means when he says empathy is both and “care” and “understanding.”  I’ve written about this before.  Part of the problem is the Valley’s long-time libertarian every man for himself culture (the care problem).  But another problem, says Kapor, is the myth that the Valley is a pure meritocracy, liberated whole from the sturm und drang of social dynamics (the understanding problem).  Truth is that practically everyone who gets ahead here has learned to leverage social capital, and some groups either have less social capital or know less about how to use it. Opportunity I trust that Kapor is empathetic.  And his biography helps to explain it.  He grew up feeling like an outsider, and he was a geek at a time when it wasn’t cool.  But he’s more than a sympathetic outsider.  He’s a shrewd businessman.  He is motivated in part by the opportunity to invest in budding entrepreneurs that can better peek around the “corners” (his word) of new marketplaces, not despite where they come from but because where they come from.  It’s not a bleeding heart that drives the Kapor Center to invest in overlooked ventures, but an imaginative business mind, augmented by the Center’s co-chair, Freada Kapor Klein (a leader in organizational culture and diversity), Benjamin Jealous (former CEO of the NAACP who just recently joined Kapor Capital as a venture partner), and growing full-time staff. Support And it’s that business mind, I suspect, that makes Kapor’s support stand out not just for the Latino community, but for the venture community, as well.  As I said, the event pulled people from all corners. Kety Esquivel, an entrepreneur and co-producer of the event, wrote to me this morning: “After years of trying to move this issue forward, I was incredibly grateful to look out into the audience and see a standing room only group of Latino entrepreneurs, investors, CEOs, founders, coders and other Latinos in Tech inspired by each other and the impact we could have in the world.” It was inspiring, true.  But just as important, it was impressive. In the end, the success of Kapor’s new app will depend on market supply and demand.  Both were represented yesterday in Austin.]]> 6915 0 0 0 KUT: Latinos Welcome SXSW Spotlight, But Still Feel Marginalized http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/kut-latinos-welcome-sxsw-spotlight-but-still-feel-marginalized/ Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:02:39 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6921 KUT Update: KUT's Veronica Zaragovia discussed Latinos at SXSW Interactive on WBUR's Here and Now today. Listen to the conversation here. Original story:  South by Southwest Interactive is underway in Austin. This year, there’s a focus on the Latinos innovation in tech – a field where many Latinos face significant barriers. When SXSW Interactive kicked off on Friday, people began discussing where Latinos stand in the tech world. Geographically, at least, they haven’t been at the center of SXSW events: the so-called Latinos in Tech sessions took place at a Holiday Inn about a mile from the Austin Convention Center. At a panel there on Friday, as one blogger typed out tweets with hashtags like #LATISM  (Latinos in Social Media), consultant and Austin taco blogger Mando Rayo asked why they were so far from the action. "What would be your suggestion to be more integrated into those conversations?" he asked. "The key players? The decision makers? Or being at the convention center?" Becky Arreaga, a speaker at a session on“Chicapreneurs," said she too was disappointed with the location and low turnout. "We need to find power behind that and demand next year that we’re at the convention center, because it does feel shameful that we’re over here," Arreaga said. One of the most famous Latinos to demand fair treatment and inclusion was the focus of a session that followed. And the crowds rolled in. Titled “What Would César Chávez Tweet?” the labor leader's son – Paul Chávez  –was a panelist. Chávez says Latinos are heavy users of social media. But he wants more Latinos of all ages to use it for social justice. Low-income Mexicans living in the U.S. already depend on their mobile phones, he says, so older Latinos can learn the technology. "What we’ve seen in agriculture is that Mexicanos have been using mobile phones for a long time now," Chávez says. "They got away from the fixed-line phones. Many of them have smart phones and they use it for wire transfers for the remittances. So we have organizers, especially young organizers, that are beginning to develop organizing campaigns using Facebook." By no small coincidence, actress Rosario Dawson was in the crowd. She has a part in a movie about César Chavez that screens today at SXSW Film. She says Latinos are quick to adopt new technologies. "Eighty percent of Latino adults use social media versus 70 percent of whites, 75 percent of African-Americans," Dawson says. "We really kind of shoot through the roof on every issue when it comes to technology." But that doesn't seem to translate into Latinos working in the tech sector. A 2010 study by the Department of Labor found less than six percent of workers in computer and math jobs in the U.S. are Latino. That can leave Latinos that do work in tech feeling isolated. Deldelp Medina is president of a group called the Latino Startup Alliance based in San Francisco. She says the group has helped her find a human connection in the tech world. "You can talk about conversion rates and you can talk about user rates," she says. "You can talk the nitty-gritty nuts and bolts of how you’re building something and what’s one product versus another. We have those conversations, that’s not unusual but we also talk about the personal part of it. Like, ‘hey how are you doing?’ This is not an easy thing to do, so 'how are you taking care of yourselves?'" Jennifer Arguello is a tech advisor at the Kapor Center in Oakland, California, which helped organize the Latinos in Technology event with Esquivel McCarson Consulting. 
She agrees that to get Latinos involved, it’s got to be about connecting. "When you look back at our culture, it’s about familia, and so whether it’s Skype and you’re calling your abuela back in South America or it’s WhatsApp and you’re texting your cousin in Costa Rica like I do, that’s what I want technology to do for me, to connect me to my loved ones and those I care about," Arguello says. But Arguello says one challenge to leveling the playing field for Latinos – when it comes to tech startups – is that many venture capitalists won’t talk to entrepreneurs who don’t already have some money to invest. "It’s a network problem so they may not know enough people that can help them out and get the word out about what they’re doing. It’s also an education problem," she says. "And this isn't just for Latinos but the public education system is not necessarily teaching the skills that we need for the future workforce." And organizers hope the networking and conversations events like this one at SXSW will lead to better – and more – opportunities in the tech sector for Latinos.]]> 6921 0 0 0 Fusion: Breaking the Status Quo of the Startup Scene http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/fusion-breaking-the-status-quo-of-the-startup-scene/ Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:07:24 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6928 Fusion Silicon Valley boasts the most thriving startup scene in the country. But the unconventional companies hawking the latest and greatest in apps and software also display a serious lack of diversity. Former NAACP President Ben Jealous wants to change that. He recently accepted a position with Kapor Capital, an Oakland-based venture capital firm that wants to bring more people of color from underrepresented backgrounds into the tech world. “Frankly, I’ll be helping to spread the gospel of how we can build a stronger, more inclusive marketplace in this country,” he said during a recent phone interview with Fusion, “by embracing companies that expand the social good and expand the pipeline to ensure that all people in all communities around the country ultimately have real opportunities to contribute to the tech economy and the future of our country.” The pipeline of talent into startup companies that Jealous referenced is currently a narrow one. Less than one percent of the founders of venture capital-backed startups in 2010 were Latino or black. Just six percent of U.S. workers in the science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields are African-American and six and a half percent are Hispanic, according to Census data, even though they make up 10 and 15 percent of the country’s population respectively. As Kilimanjaro Robbs, a product and marketing strategist and a co-founder of the Hidden Genius Project, an Oakland-based program with backing from Kapor aimed at getting young men of color into tech, pointed out during a recent interview, why would a startup founder who is strapped for time and cash spend valuable resources looking outside places like Stanford or Santa Clara University for talent? Right now, there’s no incentive. Clearly, Jealous has his work cut out for him. But he bristles at the idea that his job will be to diversify the tech industry. That’s an “oversimplification,” he said. He’s not trying to diversify the workforce at Facebook or Google, he said. Instead, he’s looking to foster startups born from unique experiences. “It’s really about expanding support for startups that promise to have a positive social impact,” Jealous said, adding that “this is as much about diversifying the idea pool as it is the talent pool.” He pointed to startups like Pigeon.ly, which was founded by a former inmate and allows prisoners and their families to share photos and phone calls, and Regalii, which was founded by a young man from the Dominican Republic and helps immigrants send money to their families. “Silicon Valley is really good at solving problems they can identify,” Jealous said, “but there are many problems they can’t identify if they’re not connected to that experience.” “Our conviction is that at the end of the day, the companies we back are more likely to succeed both at making the economy stronger and the country stronger in part because they’re willing to go looking for ideas that are too often too easily dismissed or not even considered by the status quo investor,” he added. The trick is convincing a broader audience, specifically investors, that there is a need for such products and the potential for profit. Kapor is ahead of many other venture capital firms in that it’s keeping an eye out for such startups. And Jealous will travel to places not typically associated with the startup scene to locate them. He’ll begin with a six month “listening tour” that will involve meetings with tech companies but also historically black colleges that graduate qualified computer scientists that have been left out of the college-to-startup pipeline, and organizations that encourage young under-represented minorities to pursue their startup dreams. He’ll attend the National Council of La Raza’s annual convention, which brings together Latino civil rights activists and community organizers, and he’ll show up to hackathons in Harlem. “We’ve got to start building a broader, deeper, wider pipeline,” he said. Frank Carbajal, author of Building the Latino Future and founder of the Silicon Valley Latino Leadership Summit, hopes Jealous will devote some of his time to coalition building with other minority leaders. “What Ben will run into...you can be the most experienced hands-on grassroots person in the nation, but when you look for VCs and when you look for CEOs in Silicon Valley that are Latinos and blacks, it’s a small handful. It’s not large pickings,” he said. Few of Silicon Valley’s tech companies boast truly diverse workforces, particularly at the executive level. Venture capital firms are overwhelmingly led by middle-aged white men, and most venture funding, which can make or break a startup, goes to slightly younger white men, meaning the tech world doesn’t currently get to see the diversity of startup ideas that tapping into a broader pool of innovators would bring. Carbajal pointed out that the purchasing power of the Latino community has been well-documented and discussed. But young Latinos, and other underrepresented communities, need support as designers and inventors of products, too. Jealous’ job with Kapor will focus primarily on the end of the pipeline, on the idea producers themselves. But Jealous acknowledges and is excited about encouraging young people to pursue tech careers, particularly those facing steep challenges. While the firm can actively look for minority tech entrepreneurs to fund, the nation needs to do a better job of creating them in the first place. Youngsters in Silicon Valley who come from disadvantaged, minority backgrounds face some of the most significant obstacles to entry into the tech world. The San Francisco Bay Area houses some of the most severe income inequality in the nation, according to a recent Brookings Institution study. As overwhelmingly Caucasian and Asian tech workers have flocked to San Francisco, enticed by private buses that take them south to their jobs at campuses like Google or by companies like Twitter that have taken advantage of tax breaks to stay in the city itself, neighborhoods have gentrified and housing prices have soared. So have tensions. Some lower-income residents have been forced to seek more affordable housing outside the city, which could have long-term impacts on everything from neighborhood to school diversity. As Alan Berube, the author of the Brookings study, wrote, “[The city] may struggle to maintain mixed-income school environments that produce better outcomes for low-income kids. It may have too narrow a tax base from which to sustainably raise the revenues necessary for essential city services. And it may fail to produce housing and neighborhoods accessible to middle-class workers and families, so that those who move up or down the income ladder ultimately have no choice but to move out.” Those mixed-income school environments that Berube writes about? When those disappear, so does low-income kids’ access to AP computer science classes. Schools with low-income kids are disproportionately less likely to have such classes and to be well-equipped with fast internet and devices like iPads. If a kid has no concept of what computer science is, how can we expect her to want to pursue it? Many of the kids who do manage to overcome such long odds face another obstacle closer to home. Their parents, who very often have not attended college themselves, want their children to pursue what they see as stable careers in fields like medicine or law. The idea of their kid trying to launch a startup that is every bit as likely to fail as it is to succeed seems far too risky. Kurt Collins, one of the founders of the Hidden Genius Project, said it’s partially a perception battle. People see tech as a volatile industry that caused the stock market crash, he said. The industry needs to convince these parents that the skills required to launch a successful startup are easily marketable and transferable, he said, noting that “everything is moving toward tech.” Jealous thinks that if he and others can showcase flourishing startup founders as “beacons” of success, parents will understand the risks can pay off. After all, many parents support their kids’ football dreams because the success stories of the athletes who have “made it” are highly visible. But very few young people actually grow up to play for the NFL. “We need to start making tech founders from the hood,” he said, “heroes to young people in the hood.”]]> 6928 0 0 0 New America Media: Why Oakland's a Tech Start-up Game Changer http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/new-america-media-why-oaklands-a-tech-start-up-game-changer/ Fri, 14 Mar 2014 02:23:38 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=6971 6971 0 0 0 In Largely White Male Tech World, Why Capitalism Needs An Upgrade http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/28/opinion/kapor-tech-diversity/index.html Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:05:59 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7194 Mitchell Kapor and Benjamin Todd Jealous When Frederick Hutson left prison in 2012 after serving four years on marijuana-related charges, he realized he had gained something more than his freedom: insight into an overlooked consumer market. Many inmates are stuck in an age before Instagram or Facebook, relying on envelopes and pay phones to connect with family on the outside. So Hutson founded Pigeonly, a photo-sharing and low-cost phone call service that has already helped 50,000 incarcerated individuals connect with their loved ones, maintain their ties to society, and remain a presence in their children’s lives. The story of Pigeonly is statistically unlikely: a disruptive technology created by a member of a disenfranchised community, in order to solve a problem within that community. To continue reading this op-ed go to: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/28/opinion/kapor-tech-diversity/index.html]]> 7194 0 0 0 Oakland: Brooklyn by the Bay http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/oakland-brooklyn-by-the-bay/ Fri, 02 May 2014 20:57:05 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7298
By MATT HABER
May 2, 2014
OAKLAND, Calif. — On a recent Tuesday afternoon, a group of well-dressed and soon-to-be well-groomed men sat patiently in the sun outside Temescal Alley Barbershop waiting for $25 haircuts and $30 straight-razor shaves. Some idly pecked at their phones, while others wandered into Standard & Strange, a men’s clothing store that stocks rugged-looking American-made apparel and accessories as well as some carefully selected items from overseas like Tender jeans, which are handmade and dyed by one guy in Britain and sell for $350. (A leather belt thick enough to harness a thoroughbred, also from Tender, will set you back $240.) Walking around this outpost of cool off Telegraph Avenue, you may forget that you’re just across the bay from San Francisco and not in, say, an oft-cited borough of New York City where style, shopping and food have become major draws. If so, you wouldn’t be the only one. Style.com recently published an article on Temescal Alley and pronounced it “Williamsburg-esque.” Last year, VegNews, a vegan-oriented website, ran a travel article titled “11 Reasons Why Oakland Is the New Brooklyn,” calling it “the new vegan mecca.” And in an interview with National Journal, the mayor of Oakland, Jean Quan, citing the city’s thriving arts and food scenes, proclaimed, “We’re a little bit like Brooklyn.” (Even HBO has jumped on the bandwagon, setting “Looking” — the gay man’s answer to “Girls” — partly in Oakland.) Jonathan Hewitt, a 35-year-old London transplant who works as Standard & Strange’s operations manager, and who was describing that same “Manhattan is to San Francisco as Brooklyn is to Oakland” parallel for a recent visitor, was asked if anyone really believed that Oakland was like Brooklyn. “Abso-bloody-lutely!” he said. “I hate reverting to a cliché like that, but it’s just so true.” Many people seem to be hoping that the Oakland-as-Brooklyn narrative — or at the very least, the idea that Oakland is a top-flight creative capital — takes off. In April, Visit Oakland, a nonprofit dedicated to increasing tourism in the city, kicked off an ad campaign, logo and hashtag (#oaklandloveit) in an effort to lure visitors. For many residents priced out of San Francisco, Oakland has come to be seen as a welcoming oasis, crime and civic challenges notwithstanding. “The starving artist will literally starve in San Francisco,” Mr. Hewitt said. “Whereas they can come to Oakland and they might not live in the nicest part of town necessarily, but you can afford to live here.” What keeps Oakland from being merely a cheaper option than San Francisco, however, is the way the city’s deep cultural roots entwine working-class African-American and ethnic communities, progressive politics, arts, food and more recently technology entrepreneurship.
One of the biggest draws at First Fridays, a once-a-month block party in Oakland, is the Telegraph Beer Garden. THOR SWIFT FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
“The low burn has gotten hotter in the last year.” said René de Guzman, 50, the Oakland-raised senior curator of art at the Oakland Museum of California. “Oakland is becoming the creative engine of the Bay Area.” Walking around Oakland, it’s easy to spot unironic displays of civic pride that have nothing to do with defining Oakland in opposition to San Francisco. Many of those signs are found on witty T-shirts and hats from Oaklandish, a local apparel company. Screen-printed by hand, Oaklandish’s shirts incorporate local iconography like the waterfront cranes and the view from the Bay Bridge, precisely the sort of unpretty nuts-and-bolts infrastructural details some cities may choose not to aestheticize. The company’s main store, located on Broadway in the heart of downtown, is a celebration of the city, a kind of unofficial gift shop, with a signed poster for the Oakland-set indie film “Fruitvale Station” and double doors leading to its printing facility adorned with a mural that proclaims, “Pride & Roots”; “Local Love.”
Exploring Oakland and some of its many art galleries at a First Fridays festival. THOR SWIFT FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
Started as a public art project in 2000, Oaklandish now employs 30 people (nearly half again as many during the holiday season) and has added a second line, There There, focused on other cities like Baltimore and Philadelphia. (Manhattan and Brooklyn are conspicuously absent.) It takes its name from Oakland’s own Gertrude Stein, who famously put down her hometown by declaring, “There’s no there there.” “People have pulled over U-Hauls to get shirts,” said Angela Tsay, 41, Oaklandish’s chief executive and creative director. “They want to be wearing an Oaklandish T-shirt the first time they walk into their new house.” Outfitted correctly or not, it’s those new homeowners whom some longtime residents are eyeing warily. Gentrification is as ubiquitous a topic in the cafes and bars of Oakland as pour-over coffee and Google buses are in San Francisco. The fear that rising housing costs will push out working-class families and truly turn Oakland into the next Brooklyn — a shabby-chic bedroom community that feeds white-collar workers into the bustling metropolis next door but doesn’t see much of them or their money — is an ever-present one, especially when reporters from the national news media come calling. “We’re glad to welcome folks who add value to the city,” said Chinaka Hodge, a 29-year-old poet and screenwriter who grew up in several neighborhoods in Oakland and now splits her time between the city and Los Angeles.
Ribs from B-Side BBQ. THOR SWIFT FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
Ms. Hodge and other longtime locals want new residents to understand that while Oakland may be new to them, it’s not new. “We were here,” she said. “We’ve been here. We’ve struggled to survive here, and the moment that it’s cool, not only can we not afford to live here, but our entire history is whitewashed, for lack of a better term. “I feel in many ways that it’s violent,” continued Ms. Hodge, who is African-American. “We’re being erased from history.” Ms. Hodge addressed this violence in a tongue-in-cheek music video she made in collaboration with the Bay Area rapper and poet Watsky called “Kill a Hipster.”Set in Oakland (but shot in Los Angeles), it depicts tattooed, badminton-playing newbies as “Walking Dead”-style zombie invaders, their hunger for authentic ethnic foods turning into a grisly feast on authentic ethnic people. Its refrain (taken from the slogan of a T-shirt) says it all: “Kill a hipster; save your hood.” “I think there are two narratives about Oakland that have existed for my entire life,” Ms. Hodge said.
Mateo Challed, 3, with the band Dum Spiro Spero. THOR SWIFT FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
The first narrative, she’s quick to note, is safety. Driving a reporter by her family’s home, Ms. Hodge was frank as she noted the circumstances of her childhood. “We were easily the richest family in the poor neighborhood,” she said. “When we moved in, this was a crack house, this was a crack house,” she said, pointing across the street from her father’s beautifully restored yellow Victorian with stained-glass windows. “There was police tape across the front of our house. We came home one day, chalk outlines on the front.” “Now, all white folks live there,” she said. “The second narrative has been gaining attention over the last few years,” she continued. “It’s the Michelin stars, the cool pop-ups, the Eat Real festival, the uptown story. “Any exposure can be great, but I want to be able to afford to live here in 20 years. I want to be able to raise my family in the neighborhood that everyone thought was ugly until Jerry Brown encourages 10,000 new people to show up and make Oakland theirs.”
A Cypress Sling, a signature drink at B-Side BBQ. THOR SWIFT FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
Those 10,000 new residents were lured to Oakland as part of the 10K Project, a program of urban renewal and revitalization undertaken by Gov. Jerry Brown when he was mayor of the city from 1999 to 2007. The governor has lived in Oakland since 1994 and remains one of the city’s biggest cheerleaders, favorably citing its “edgy quality.” “I’ve seen the downtown utterly changed,” Governor Brown said in a phone interview. “You have a very lively scene. It’s restored vitality to downtown that hasn’t seen excitement in 60 years.” That excitement is on full display at First Fridays, a once-a-month block party that grew out of Art Murmur, an open galleries event. During a recent evening, crowds filled a five-block stretch of Telegraph Avenue checking out the galleries, vendors and food trucks. Drum circles, rappers and brass bands vied for attention amid lowrider cars, comedians and models strutting down a makeshift runway to James Brown’s “Say It Loud — I’m Black and I’m Proud.” The scene collapsed boundaries among subcultures: hip-hop, Burning Man and foodie posses mingled promiscuously. At times, the scene seemed to break the constraints of time itself with vendors selling “Free Angela” and “Free Huey” buttons as if the heyday of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense were still in effect. The same mixing of crowds can be found at Brown Sugar Kitchen, a soul-food-inflected breakfast spot in West Oakland that opened on Martin Luther King’s Birthday in 2008 and now features long lines around the block most weekends. “It’s like the New York City subway here,” said Tanya Holland, the restaurant’s 48-year-old chef-owner. “You can have the steampunk sitting next to the cop sitting next to the millionaire real estate developer. You see every kind of person here.” Brown Sugar kitchen, along with B-Side BBQ (also owned by Ms. Holland and her husband, Phil Surkis) and Fauna, an Art Deco bar on Telegraph that adjoins Flora, are just a few of the restaurants that lure San Francisco diners to Oakland. Owned by Dona Savitsky, 43, and Thomas Schnetz, 47, Flora has all the details of a major metropolitan restaurant with none of the airs. “Being over here is great,” Ms. Savitsky said. “I don’t think we’re trying to be San Francisco. Nor will we ever be.” One area in which many are hoping Oakland can be both cutting edge and truly supportive of the community is technology. Mitchell Kapor, the software mogul behind Lotus 1-2-3, moved to Oakland’s Jack London Square from San Francisco’s upscale Pacific Heights less than two years ago with his wife, Freada Kapor Klein. “Career-wise, my talent has been seeing around corners,” Mr. Kapor, 63, said. “We had the feeling we were at the beginning of a big moment in Oakland. “There’s a sense that everything is possible,” continued Mr. Kapor, whose Kapor Center for Social Impact funds various groups in the Bay Area committed to diversifying the face of technology, like Black Girls Code and Hidden Genius Project. “We’re going to see an explosion of tech in Oakland. It’s the next big area.” Pandora, the music streaming service, has its headquarters here, and there are rumors that Google has considered opening an office in the city. Mr. Kapor’s enthusiasm is echoed by some of the young tech founders who share a work space in Jack London Square called the Port. Among the developing companies found there is deliberateLIFE, an app-based lifestyle publication that showcases socially responsible products and travel; Shop Pad, a mobile e-commerce platform; and Clef, an identity verification tool that seeks to replace passwords with users’ phones. The office buzzes with collaborative energy as they work on different projects. Once a week, the team from Clef makes dinner for everyone. They’ve served falafel, ramen, and chicken potpie along with beer and sympathy to end rough days of fund-raising or to fuel late nights of coding. “Having creative people around has really made a difference as we’ve grown,” said Fay M. Johnson, 31, chief executive and founder of deliberateLIFE. Ms. Johnson was sitting in a conference room with Clef’s Brennen Byrne, 23, and Shop Pad’s Aaron Wadler, 30, near the terminus for a slide that was being installed between floors. “This is a much more collaborative version of what I’d get at an incubator in the city.” Across the hall is Ms. Johnson’s office, where there’s a blackboard with the outline of the state of California. Written across it in a confident hand is the phrase, “Where Awesome Lives.” An arrow points directly at Oakland.
]]>
7298 0 0 0
MC Hammer, Mitch Kapor kick off Oakland tech entrepreneurs event http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/mc-hammer-mitch-kapor-kick-off-oakland-tech-entrepreneurs-event/ Tue, 06 May 2014 17:49:54 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7316 May 6, 2014, 2:16pm PDT UPDATED: May 6, 2014, 2:31pm PDT

MC Hammer, Mitch Kapor kick off Oakland tech entrepreneurs event

Mitch Kapor
Mitch Kapor: "I’m inspired by entrepreneurs we work with who are changing the world."
Oakland is the next big place for tech companies and investors.
At least that’s what tech luminary Mitch Kapor and investor and former rapper MC Hammer said at the kickoff event for VatorSplash Oakland, a convention for tech entrepreneurs and venture capitalists hosted by Vator Inc. “Oakland’s time is here,” Kapor said. “Tech is coming to Oakland already and it’s terribly exciting.” Kapor founded the Lotus Corp., which was acquired by IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM) in 1995 for $3.5 billion, served as the first chair of the Mozilla Foundation, andfounded the Kapor Center for Social Impact with his wife, Freada Kapor Klein. Kapor said many factors might influence the number of tech companies calling Oakland home, in particular the high-cost of living in San Francisco. “Rent pressure alone is driving things to the East Bay,” he said. Hammer, who has been involved in the Bay Area startup scene since the mid-90s, thinks what will really make Oakland a tech hub is a Twitter-like startup. “People follow the money,” he said. “There’ll be an entrepreneur that’s gonna come to Oakland and build a huge company that’s gonna move the needle. Then other companies will come build around that company. It’s just a matter of time. It’s gonna happen.” In fact, a new infrastructure serving entrepreneurs is already sprouting in Oakland, according to some tech leaders. When prompted, both Kapor and Hammer said that a new waterfront stadium for the A’s could spark “SoMa-like growth” in Oakland and were generally supportive of the idea. Vator Inc. is a startup that attempts to connect entrepreneurs and investors.
]]>
7316 0 0 0
#VatorSplashOakland: Mitch Kapor keynote says Oakland’s the new spot for tech expansion http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/vatorsplashoakland-mitch-kapor-keynote-says-oaklands-the-new-spot-for-tech-expansion/ Mon, 12 May 2014 17:58:31 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7320 #VatorSplashOakland: Mitch Kapor keynote says Oakland’s the new spot for tech expansion
Posted on Sunday, May 11 at 10:21am | By 
MVI_3244-0121 By Howard Dyckoff Mitch Kapor, one of the early business icons of the personal computer revolution, shared an informal keynote and Q/A session with Vator CEO and Founder Bambi Francisco  when the conference kicked off on Tuesday in which he proclaimed that Oakland is the new destination for tech company startups and the Venture Capital firms that nurture those tech start-ups.  He also thinks the diversity of Oakland and of its many non-profit organizations will catalyze and transform the tech industry. Kapor is the founder of Lotus  Development, the company that created Lotus 1-2-3, the first popular spreadsheet and graphing program that ran on personal computers.  Later, in 1990, he was a  co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and served as its chairman until 1994. EFF has long been an advocate for personal privacy and the rights of digital natives. Kapor now resides in Oakland and, with his wife Freada Kapor Klein, runs the Kapor Center for Social Impact on Broadway which invests in start-ups with economic and social missions. Francisco called Kapor “the first mover” on Oakland’s growing tech startup scene.  He agreed with Francisco that tech companies and start-ups are coming to Oakland. “Oakland’s time is coming,  in fact Oakland’s time is already here,” Kapor said. “Tech IS coming to Oakland and it’s terribly exciting.” Kapor used his metaphor about seeing around corners, meaning that an investor has to consider longer time frames for planning and take account of rising trends. “If you go back to the 50s and 60s …there was zero tech in SF, ”  Kapor told the audience.  “It was all in the Valley.. and it crept northward in early 2000′s.” He said the same economic and housing pressures that led that northward expansion of technology companies was now leading to eastward movement to the East Bay and to Oakland.    
]]>
7320 0 0 0
Women 2.0 kicks off monthly meetings in Oakland http://bit.ly/1uRXGuc Wed, 14 May 2014 19:08:26 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7335
Posted on Tuesday, May 13 at 9:00am | By 
IMG_20140501_192018_159 By Sophia Elson Earlier this month, Women 2.0 held its first Oakland meet-up, initiating Oakland as the fifteenth city worldwide where the women-in-tech platform holds its monthly networking events. The back conference room at Pandora’s headquarters, where the meet-up was held, was packed. Unsurprisingly, the attendees were mostly women, but a number of men were also present, some of whom were representing the Kapor Center for Social Impact, one of Women 2.0’s partners for the Oakland event. After the crowd had engaged in some preliminary networking, food-munching and wine-sipping, founder and CEO Shaherose Charania kicked things off with a spirited talk on the importance of diversity in tech and the origins of Women 2.0. Initially a simple series of wine-and-cheese networking gatherings in women’s private apartments, the concept eventually became a serious full-time venture that is now providing online content, virtual and in-person events, conferences, and a job board to an international community of women.

Read more of this story–and lots more about Oakland tech–at Live Work Oakland: http://bit.ly/1uRXGuc

Follow Live Work Oakland on Facebook and Twitter for updates on the growing local innovation economy in Oakland, California.
]]>
7335 0 0 0
White and Male, Google Releases Diversity Data http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/white-and-male-google-releases-diversity-data/ Thu, 29 May 2014 16:37:25 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7356 7356 0 0 0 Google to address diversity dilemma with Kapor Center counsel http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/google-to-address-diversity-dilemma-with-kapor-center-counse/ Thu, 29 May 2014 16:48:01 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7359 Sarah Drake Contributor- Silicon Valley Business Journal After Google disclosed data yesterday that showed its employee base is largely white and male, the company announced a partnership with the Kapor Center for Social Impact to boost its workplace diversity and "fix a leaky pipeline problem in tech." The focus of the partnership is to address barriers and other issues that may inhibit Google from being an inclusive employer, according to a press release. "The best entrepreneurs see big problems and create new solutions. Typically, they develop products that address a gap from their lived experience," Mitch Kapor, an entrepreneur-turned-investor and co-chair of the Kapor Center, said in a statement. “By not proactively embracing diverse talent, Silicon Valley is leaving out entire markets that could yield untapped revenue." Google and the Kapor Center’s plan to amend the problem touches on three steps: 1. Foster an unbiased and inclusive workplace. 2. Over the short term, boost the diversity of the hiring pool by searching for real talent and not just recognizing patterns of familiar candidates. 3. Over the long term, invest in fixing the pipeline to tech jobs by creating new generations of talent and developing a pipeline that resembles America. Companies: GOOG]]> 7359 0 0 0 College Bound Brotherhood Celebrates Graduates http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/college-bound-brotherhood-celebrates-graduates/ Fri, 30 May 2014 23:03:14 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7368 By Posted 
Representing high schools from as far away as Pittsburgh and Pebble Beach, some 120 graduating high school students participated Tuesday night at the College Bound Brotherhood’s graduation celebration at the Kaiser Center in Oakland. < p>Each student took the stage in a ceremony that honored their passage from high school to acceptance into college, stating the higher education institution of their choice to an audience of 400 youth advocates, family and friends.The students took the opportunity to give shout outs and mention their full ride scholarships in academics and athletics to schools, including California State East Bay, Southern University, UC Davis and Yale. Each student was draped in traditional Kente cloth mantles. Keynote speaker Benjamin Todd Jealous, former head of the NAACP and venture partner of Kapor Capital, spoke of his pride at seeing so many successful young Black men, while discussing the sobering realities facing young people today. “We have the right to get a job in any company, but (we) lost small businesses by the thousands,” he said. “We have the right to purchase a home anywhere, but our neighborhoods are unstable. It’s not enough to know to fight but have stock in what you already have.” “This is the most murdered generation in history and the most incarcerated on the planet, and African American males are 3.5 times more incarcerated than in South Africa during apartheid,” he said. “We have many civil rights era victories. We got what we fought for, but we lost what we had.”
Jealous also told the students to live by the African proverb, “I am we.” “Understand your value and stand up for each other,” he said. “Fight for yourselves and the community because I believe in each of you, I believe in what you all will become.” “This event is my favorite of the year, a day to highlight and visually see a collective of young Black men making this declaration of the next step of their lives,” said Cedric Brown, managing partner of Kapor Center for Social Impact. The College Bound Brotherhood is a network supported by the Kapor Center for Social Impact, the College Access Foundation of California and the Marcus Foster Education Fund. Through investments and strategic partnerships, the organization seeks to increase college readiness, enrollment and completion rates for African American males in the San Francisco Bay Area. Supporters include the Omega Boys Club, Concerned Parents, East Oakland Youth Development Center, Striving Black Brothers Coalition and Youth Radio among others. For more information visit: www.CollegeBoundBros.org.
]]>
7368 0 0 0
Diversity champion says Silicon Valley overlooks minority talent http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/diversity-champion-says-silicon-valley-overlooks-minority-talent/ Fri, 30 May 2014 16:41:34 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7418

RUSS MITCHELL
Four white guys and an Indian. A male Indian. That's the central cast of the new HBO hit sitcom “Silicon Valley.” The race and gender breakdown only slightly exaggerates the makeup of Silicon Valley's actual workforce. Google Inc. recently released figures that show just how homogenous its 46,000-plus employee base is: 70% men, 30% women, 61% white, 30% Asian, 3% Latino and 2% black. Google said, “That's miles away from where we want to be,” and announced that it would work hard for more diversity. Google's announcement prompted immediate protest. “All positions should be given on merit alone, the best qualified candidate gets the job” was among the milder comments posted on news sites. Freada Kapor Klein is having none of it. “Silicon Valley's obsession with meritocracy is delusional and aspirational and not a statement of how it really operates,” she said. “Unless someone wants to posit that intelligence is not evenly distributed across genders and race, there has to be some systematic explanation for what these numbers look like.” Google announced that it would partner with the Kapor Center to help diversify its own workforce and work with other Silicon Valley companies to do the same. Google plans a “big tent” event later in the year to bring in valley luminaries to address the issue. Klein agrees that hard work, strong computer skills and a willingness and ability to learn are essential for a successful career in technology. That's why, she said, the Kapor Center is working to improve the pipeline of talent with programs such as its SMASH Academy, which brings mostly poor black and Latino high school students to summer programs at UCLA, USC, Stanford and UC Berkeley to study science, technology, engineering and math. But, Klein maintains, tech companies often overlook minority talent through unconscious or hidden bias. Studies have shown that even managers who don't believe that they are biased tend to hire people very much like themselves. She calls this a “leaking pipeline” of talent that Google, for one, has begun to address through management courses in hidden bias. Google is also moving away from its laser focus on grade point averages and SAT scores because they've proved to be “not good predictors” of employee success if not considered alongside traits like personal resilience and approaches to problem solving, Klein said. A kid who “took all [advanced placement] classes in high school, which was three, because you go to an inner-city failure factory where half the kids dropped out” may show more pluck and commitment than a kid who “went to an independent school and took three AP classes out of 80, Klein said. Google posted on its blog Wednesday that the company has “always been reluctant to publish numbers about the diversity of our workforce at Google. We now realize we were wrong.” Asked for comment Friday, Google released a statement reiterating what it said on its blog. In 2010, Google, along with Apple Inc., Yahoo Inc., Oracle Corp. and Applied Materials Inc., was allowed by federal regulators to keep its diversity breakdown secret after a Freedom of Information request from the San Jose Mercury News. Apple declined to comment Friday about whether it plans to follow Google's lead and release its diversity numbers. A Yahoo spokesperson said, “At this time, we do not break out statistics on race or gender for our workforce.” Oracle and Applied Materials did not respond to questions. During the 2010 controversy, Intel Corp. spokesman Chuck Mulloy publicized the company’s figures -- and Intel continues to post workforce statistics on its website. “There's nothing to hide, in our view,” he said at the time. “We're very proud of the diversity programs we have in place.”  
]]>
7418 0 0 0
Google finds that there’s ‘beauty and strength’ in diversity http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/google-finds-that-theres-beauty-and-strength-in-diversity/ Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:30:45 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7432

Opinion

by Freada Kapor Klein and Ben Jealous | 
As usual, Maya Angelou said it best. “It is time for parents,” she said, “to teach young people early on that in diversity there is beauty and there is strength.” Most Americans understand the “beauty” of diversity.  They recognize the social value it brings to the table. But too many — particularly those from privileged backgrounds — have yet to internalize the strength of diversity. However, in Silicon Valley, that may be about to change. When Google released its own dismal diversity numberslast month, they showed what we already knew — that their workforce is overwhelmingly white and male. Their decision to set a baseline for improvement is an encouraging sign that they recognize Ms. Angelou’s lesson — that diversity brings beauty and brings strength. In short, this move is crucial to Google’s competitive advantage. Here’s why: Entrepreneurs tend to scratch their own itch, meaning they develop products that address a gap in their own lived experiences. Right now, Silicon Valley is overflowing with companies building photo apps, mindless games (Flappy bird, anyone?) and time-wasting click-bait sites. This is hardly surprising, given the homogenous nature of Silicon Valley that is reflected in Google’s diversity data.  This is a limited vision of what the tech world can offer. At a recent Oakland hackathon hosted by the Level Playing Field Institute, the organization brought together low-income students of color for a weekend and taught them how to develop a mobile app to solve a real problem in their school or community. One team of students developed an app that matched local science, math, engineering and tech mentors with low-income mentees of color. And last year at an LPFI  convening of  6th-8th grade African-American boys, participants built an app that not only helps people who live in fooddeserts find healthy food at affordable prices but also identifies stores’ hours and whether they take food stamps. Few people in the Silicon Valley ecosystem could have imagined that idea because they lack those life experiences to draw upon. In turn, many tech companies are missing out on entire markets that could both generate a profit and solve real-world problems. Google, of course, is one of the most influential companies in the world, and it is seen as an inspiration to many budding tech startups. Their decision to voluntarily share their diversity data and find rigorous way to solve their problem may be a tipping point in Silicon Valley and throughout our economy. Tech, however, will only achieve meaningful diversity by addressing the pipeline issues, hidden biases and workplace culture problems that perpetuate the status quo. The Kapor Center for Social Impact is helping Google to address each of these concerns. As Google’s Senior Vice President of People Operations Laszlo Bock explained, achieving diversity is difficult largely due to a “pipeline problem” — the fact that women and people of color are less likely to earn degrees that prepare them for work at a big tech company. To solve this, we must help fill the pipeline with talent from diverse backgrounds through programs like SMASH, a summer STEM enrichment program for underrepresented high school students of color, which provides access to rigorous coursework, college preparation, and access to mentors, role models, and support networks of students of color.  SMASH is beginning its eleventh summer this month.  Investments like these are critical to solving the diversity problem in the long term. Google must also combat the impact of hidden bias that affects all workplace cultures and leads to talent leaking from the pipeline. Advances in Neuroscience show that, despite our best intentions to be fair and create meritocracies, we are more likely to see talent in those who look like us. Companies need to develop ways to ensure that they are looking for real talent and not just choosing people who are familiar. As Maya Angelou said, “The need for change bulldozed a road down the center of my mind.” Google’s decision to not only reveal its lackluster diversity data but also to seek help in improving is a bold embrace of the need for change. Tech is the engine of the American economy. We’re working with Google to make these needed changes because it’s the right thing to do, but equally important, because our standard of living hangs on whether Google gets this right. Freada Kapor Klein is co-founder of the Kapor Center, and  Ben Jealous is former head of the NAACP and now a Kapor Capital Venture Partner
]]>
7432 0 0 0
Pattern recognition http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/pattern-recognition/ Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:23:31 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7454

By Freada Kapor Klein, Ana Díaz-Hernández, June 2014

Silicon Valley prides itself on being a perfect meritocracy, but there is an endless search for short cuts, or "pattern recognition," that can be used to spot the next hugely successful entrepreneurs: Male (usually Caucasian, but Asian is OK, too), young, educated at elite institutions (whether graduated or not), and highly technical. If that really is the pattern that reflects the best and brightest, then is it the case that women and underrepresented racial/ethnic groups are just devoid of the skills and intelligence necessary to succeed in this industry? Or, as more recently gets asserted, is it a pipeline problem? Is not enough talent reaching the desks of the recruitment managers? Most of us would like to believe we really are gender-blind and color-blind, that we judge others based on their individual merit and not by their gender or ethnicity. But is that true? Thanks to advances in neuroscience, we're learning a lot more about how we make decisions, especially at the unconscious level, and raising fundamental doubts about this self-belief. Dozens of fascinating studies demonstrate that merely changing identifying information on a resume, a theater script, or a journal article dramatically alters how likely it is to be accepted. Quite recently, near-identical resumes were sent to faculty members to evaluate candidates for a lab manager position. Half were named John and half were named Jennifer [1]. Jennifer was seen as less competent, more likable, less likely to be considered worth mentoring, and offered a starting salary of $26,508 versus John's $30,238. Even more striking was the fact that there were no differences in how the candidates were ranked by male or female faculty, younger or older professors, or across the disciplines of physics, biology, and chemistry. Quite germane to technology, a fascinating series of studies were done by Sapna Cheryan at the University of Washington, and colleagues at other institutions, exploring what impact the physical work environment might have on female computer scientists' interest in working there. Simple changes such as swapping a nature poster for a "Star Trek" poster were shown to boost undergraduate women's interest. All of the advantages of diversity—ideas for startups born of different lived experience, new approaches to problem-solving and managing—can only be achieved if we challenge the belief that there is only one best way to run a meeting or a company or there is one type of qualified candidate for every job. These beliefs may hold a grain of truth, but they also leave room for bucketfuls of hidden biases. Our sister organization, the Level Playing Field Institute, recently studied the impact of hidden bias in tech workplaces—both large companies and startups. What was striking was the degree to which engineers and managers in the same companies have day-to-day experiences that differ dramatically. Even though they're often on the same team or in the same department, some feel respected and encouraged, while others feel excluded and ignored. These views aren't randomly distributed across the group of engineers and managers, they strongly correlate to race and gender. A particularly striking finding was while 60 percent of men in startups believe diverse teams are better at innovation and problem solving, only 41 percent would be in favor of a company-wide hiring practice to increase diversity. Really? If 60 percent believed, for example, knowing how to code made for better hires, would only 41 percent be in favor of hiring people who knew how to code? In that same study, women and underrepresented people of color were far more likely to believe in the importance of diverse representation on teams and to support company hiring practices to achieve diversity than their white, male counterparts. Under-represented people of color were nearly twice as likely as whites to be in favor of a company-wide practice to increase diversity (80 percent compared with 46 percent). Eighty-two percent of men in startups believed their companies spent the "right amount of time" addressing diversity. Until our experiences of our shared workplaces converge, we will continue to confuse "style and fit" with merit. This undermines fundamental fairness and robs individuals, companies, and society of the benefit of everyone's talents. Imagine a company that innovated in order to figure out how to achieve bias-free hiring, or to help employees balance their careers, children, and other life pursuits. As long as we have one and only one model of success (Marissa Mayer spoke of working 20 hours a day at Google and sleeping under her desk) and one view of what talent looks like (either a graduate or a dropout of a top-tier university), we'll all lose out. Economies cannot remain—or become—competitive without finding all available talent, nurturing it, and providing opportunities for budding entrepreneurs, investors, and employees from every corner. back to top  How Bias Unfolds In the United States, there is a significant underrepresentation of African-American and Latino employees generally, and female engineers specifically within startups. This is a complex phenomenon, but mostly due to three factors:
  1. Lack of social network or college pedigree for diverse applicants.
  2. Risk profile and compensation.
  3. The bias of "culture fit" related to race, class, and/or gender.
The first reason, the social network, is probably the most prevalent and the hardest to track. It's very difficult to measure the instances of applicants who did not even get the opportunity to enter the hiring funnel. Most technology companies hire primarily by employee referral; current employees are compensated when their employer hires people they recommend. By using these networks, the same schools, backgrounds, and former employers are represented. Many candidates coming from different networks, schools, and backgrounds are generally unaware of this dynamic, and expend a lot of time and energy dropping applications into a vacuum, never to be considered.

Economies cannot remain, or become, competitive without finding all available talent, nurturing it and providing opportunities for budding entrepreneurs, investors and employees from every corner.


The second reason, risk profile and compensation, refers to cultural reasons regarding how diverse applications tend to treat risk. Candidates from these groups may get through the process of interviewing and want to work at the startup, but they don't understand the equity opportunities or prefer the cash liquidity over the potential upside of having equity in a growing company. Many recently graduated Latino and African-American students have significant student loan debt and financial responsibilities to support their families—how can they choose a lower salary option and risky equity packages, when liquidity might actually be very important to this candidate? Although liquidity is not the primary motivation of every diverse candidate, it is simply an example. The third reason, "X candidate is not a culture fit," refers to the most blatant bias seen in tech recruiting, yet under the guise of an objective business reason. This statement represents a series of concerns and biases, masqueraded behind a very simple, harmless sounding statement. While fit with a company's culture, especially at a startup is important, the specifics need careful examination. For some candidates, it may mean they don't fulfill the physical characteristics (not a white, male hacker) recruiters expect for someone doing this role. For others, it may mean the candidate does not seem to like drinking as much as the average member of the company. The recruiting team, which is trained to pattern recognize in a highly generalizable fashion, looks at a particular role and tries to find candidates who match the qualifications and skills of the first few candidates doing that same role. However, the fact that the model is being based on a 25 year old, white, male who dropped out of Carnegie Mellon to join Y-Combinator before getting acquired by this hot startup makes this profile very hard to replicate. Are these characteristics really good heuristics for hiring success? back to top  Opportunities for Improvement There are some interventions employers can take to ameliorate these issues, though.
  • Anonymize resumes and remove university affiliation.
  • Prime candidates.
  • Reconfigure employee referral benefits.
  • Set an explicit diversity hiring goal.
The first opportunity, anonymizing resumes, is designed to help an organization better understand how its hiring has been biased, and in response, to have an honest conversation about the validity of these hiring proxies. The resume study mentioned previously showed the mere existence of an African-American or Latino name on a resume, all other factors being equal, is of great disadvantage to an applicant. We are proposing you isolate a particular team or function and run a pilot, stripping a subset of new resumes of name and school attended, before reviewing the candidate. Now codify the results and compare it to your control, which was not anonymized. Did you offer more phone screens to diverse candidates? Interview some of these candidates and confront some of your organization's assumptions about the correlation between college attended and competency. The typical proxies of success, like school attended or GPA, have been found by organizations like Google to not be predictive of employee success. Similarly, The College Board has recently overhauled the SAT because, among many failings, there was a direct relationship between increasing family income and increasing scores. Many technology companies currently use these and other similarly unpredictive factors as proxies for future success at their organization. Laszlo Bock of Google proposes shifting interview techniques toward expressed general cognitive ability and creative problem solving of real-workplace situations [2]. The second intervention we propose is priming candidates once they make it through the initial screening process. Many diverse candidates come from backgrounds where strategies for getting jobs at technology companies are not understood—often nobody in their peer group has ever pursued a career in the technology sector. Making sure candidates are primed with information about the style, length, tone, and general content of the interview tasks can be immensely helpful in making sure they are comfortable and not completely surprised by the interview. A fascinating study confirms the importance of priming college freshmen [3]. A video that depicted common anxiety-inducing experiences (for instance difficulty finding study groups, or concerns that everyone else is smarter) dramatically assuaged these issues. The video promoted social belonging by demonstrating these experiences are common and not a sign of an individual's weakness, and had a lasting impact. In fact, the African-American students who viewed the video had significantly higher GPAs and graduation rates than their counterparts who had not. In addition to priming a candidate during an interview, employers should consider better informing candidates of their options as they approach the final stages of extending an offer. The culture of recruiting often treats candidates as sales targets to close, rather than team members to nurture and include in the process. Many diverse candidates are not aware of the cost of living in large cities, don't understand stock liquidation, are not aware their stake in a company can get diluted with further funding rounds, or don't know how much runway the company has available to continue operating, among other big issues. Instead of seeing this as a win because you get a better deal out of this candidate, be candid about the reality of working at this company. In the end, any purposeful exclusion of important information will become very evident, and the employee may grow to resent the employer or hiring manager, leading to a negative working relationship. A third intervention we recommend is for hiring managers to reconsider the process of paid employee referrals to make new hires. Encouraging employee referrals at an exorbitant rate ($5,000, per hire, for instance) may actually encourage employees to put anyone through the pipeline, instead of the most qualified. This serves to further flood the hiring pipeline with candidates who resemble your existing workforce. Employees tend to know people who look like them, have similar interests, and studied at the same school or peer institutions. If hiring managers reduce the monetary incentive to put every living soul through the pipeline, and increase the incentives for diverse candidates specifically while still keeping it under an exorbitant amount (perhaps no more than $1,000 or $2,000 for diverse candidates), the incentives will be better aligned with building a better, more diverse team, and less with making an extra $5,000 from a referral. Our final recommendation is to be open and honest about your desire to diversify your workforce. If a company is not outwardly honest about this intention, applications from diverse candidates will not simply increase of their own accord. Candidates want to know their application will be taken seriously, despite their background differing from the norm in some way. Companies should make it an explicit initiative both internally (within teams) and externally (through public material such as websites, media communication, and recruitment literature). Companies gain a reputation as "inclusive" or "not inclusive"; being open about your intentions can lead to the creation of a culture and reputation for inclusivity. Internally, we recommend actually setting a concrete goal for the company to hit. Without a diversity goal it can be hard to track success. Such a goal could take the form: "We want our company to look like the available candidate pool of those with relevant education and/or experience within 24 months, with progressive check-ins every quarter. We're specifically focusing on the hiring of Latino and African-American candidates for every role where we are most deficient, as well as more female engineers." Since setting diversity goals often engenders questions, if not outright backlash, it's important to explain the business reasons for doing so. Pointing out the changing demographics of your customers will be important if this is an important part of your customer/client/user base. Citing research on the advantages to creativity and profitability of diversity may be important to your current employees. back to top  Concluding Thoughts Hidden biases of hiring managers are holding back organizations from hiring in a more meritocratic manner, therefore limiting the diversity of their companies. The human brain is built to recognize patterns based on information it has seen before, so hiring tends to take the form of hiring more people who are like the existing workforce. This means highly qualified candidates who break these assumptions about gender, background or ethnicity are not getting a fair evaluation, or even a first look. We recommend thinking carefully about what qualities are really crucial in executing a job well, and hiring based on skills relating to the actual execution of the role. Steps that mitigate the recruitment managers' implicit biases, and measures such as anonymization of resumes, may help organizations get closer to their meritocratic ideals. How many other examples can you think of that are used in tech companies to "identify talent" but which, in reality, are merely proxies for accidents of birth and not for merit or potential? We have developed the Kapor Center Impact Fellowship, which places students from underrepresented backgrounds at startups for the summer. Most of our candidates are from "non-Ivies," and many come from the South and Midwest regions of the United States—areas not generally associated with the technology industry. We've taken a more holistic approach to evaluate our candidates; we look at general cognitive ability to do real workplace tasks, writing ability, excitement for the role and mission of the organization, motivation, long-term goals, and distance traveled. We've gotten an outside party to evaluate their technical ability and have been quite impressed with our results thus far. We've effectively rejected typical proxies like SAT, GPA, or school attended, and are finding exciting results. back to top  References [1] Moss-Racusin, C. A. et al. Science Faculty's Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. PNAS 109, 41 (2012). [2] Bryant, A. In Head-Hunting, Big Data May Not Be Such a Big Deal. New York Times. June 19, 2013.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/business/in-head-hunting-big-data-may-not-be-such-a-big-deal.html?_r=1& [3] Walton, G. and Cohen, G. A Brief Social-Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students. Science 331, 6023 (2011). back to top  Authors Freada Kapor Klein is the founder of the Level Playing Field Institute, which strives to increase fairness in education and the workplace by closing the opportunity gap and removing barriers to success. The Institute's Summer Math and Science Honors Academy (SMASH), a three-summer high school program serving underrepresented students of color, works to ensure racial equity within the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. As a Partner at Kapor Capital, Klein invests in women entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs of color whose IT start-ups aspire to generate economic value and positive social impact. Ana Díaz-Hernández is a venture analyst at Kapor Capital and manages the Kapor Center Impact Fellowship, which places students from underrepresented backgrounds in summer internships at tech companies. She is a graduate of Stanford University and participated in several research projects relating to urban planning, public health, and civic engagement. She has also worked at two startups, Spool and Dropbox, doing product marketing, sales and internationalization. back to top  Copyright held by Owner(s)/Author(s). The Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2014 ACM, Inc.
]]>
7454 0 0 0
Facebook data shows diversity gap goes beyond technology jobs http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/facebook-data-shows-diversity-gap-goes-beyond-technology-jobs/ Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:25:03 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7462 Diversity data “Since our strategic diversity team launched last year, we’re already seeing improved new hire figures and lower attrition rates for underrepresented groups,” Maxine Williams, Facebook’s global head of diversity, said in the post. “As these numbers show, we have more work to do ― a lot more.” Facebook’s data don’t differ much from other Silicon Valley Web companies. Google is 30 per cent female, while Yahoo is 37 per cent and LinkedIn is at 39 per cent. The data suggest that other technology companies also have a low percentage of non- white or non-Asian workers in non-technical jobs, according to Kapor Klein. Technology companies have traditionally pointed to the lack of qualified female and non-Asian minority technologists to explain their diversity gap, but the Facebook data suggests that the problem goes far beyond that, Kapor Klein said. “Other industries have done a much better job of recruiting sales and accounting and general management candidates than tech,” Kapor Klein said. “It’s not that there isn’t an adequate supply.” Broader efforts Facebook said it’s teaming up with several organisations, including the National Centre for Women & Information Technology and the National Society of Black Engineers to improve diversity. Google last week introduced Made With Code, an organisation to inspire girls to write software by showing them role models and teaching them introductory coding. The group said it’s committing US$50 million (RM160 million) to support programmes that get more women into computer science. Along with its dislosure, Facebook announced seven initiatives to help close its diversity gap. Four of them related specifically to increasing the number of female or minority technologists. Silicon Valley is also less diverse compared with the rest of the country, with Hispanics and blacks making up 15 per cent and 11 per cent of the US labour force in 2012, according to the most recent data available from the US Department of Labour. “The irony is that Silicon Valley companies claim to be more enlightened than the rest of corporate America, but we’re learning that they are actually doing worse,” Kapor Klein said. ― Bloomberg]]> 7462 0 0 0 Lack of diversity could undercut Silicon Valley http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/lack-of-diversity-could-undercut-silicon-valley/ Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:31:18 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7465
 823CONNECT 231TWEET 36LINKEDIN 152COMMENTEMAILMORE
PALO ALTO, Calif. — The technology industry's predominantly white and Asian male workforce is in danger of losing touch with the diverse nation — and world — that forms its customer base. Recently released numbers from some of the largest and most powerful companies confirm what many had suspected: Opportunity here is not created equal. Blacks and Hispanics are largely absent, and women are underrepresented in Silicon Valley — from giant companies to start-ups to venture capital firms.
USATODAY Status update: Facebook not so diverse
The industry that bills itself as a meritocracy actually looks more like a "mirrortocracy," says longtime high-tech entrepreneur Mitch Kapor, co-chair of the Kapor Center for Social Impact. Even as companies scramble to find workers in the most competitive hiring market in recent memory, most are continuing to bring aboard people who look like they do. And that, Kapor says, could undercut Silicon Valley, which needs the best people and ideas to create the next Facebook or Google. Eric Kelly is president and CEO of Overland Storage in San Jose, and chairman of Canadian-based Sphere 3D. He is also one of the few black CEOs of a publicly traded technology company. He says having managers and senior executives with differing perspectives gives companies like his an edge in the marketplace. By 2040, the U.S. will be a minority majority, with 42% of the country black or Hispanic. "I bet we'll be able to do some really interesting business case studies in 10 years and see what companies did and didn't make it — and who had the most diverse teams from top to bottom," Kelly said. With the technology sector fueling the U.S. economy, the low rate of participation in high tech also threatens to drive up the unemployment rate for blacks and Hispanics, which is already three times the national average. Computer science jobs are the fastest growing and command the highest salaries. Yet just one in 14 technical employees in Silicon Valley is black or Hispanic.
USATODAY Tech: Where the women and minorities aren't
"The numbers are not where we want them to be," said Sarah Stuart, manager of global diversity and talent inclusion at Google. Nationally, blacks make up 12% of the U.S. workforce and Hispanics 14%. At Google, 3% of the staff are Hispanic and 2% black. At Yahoo and Facebook 4%are Hispanic and 2% black. Unconscious bias No one's saying this is the overt discrimination or explicit bias of the 1950s or even the 1970s. It's much more subtle and has everything to do with where you went to school, what you studied and who you roomed with, either at Stanford University or in your apartment in San Francisco's Mission District. Silicon Valley is very network driven, and hiring is very referral based, says Laura Weidman Powers, co-founder of Code 2040, which works to bring blacks and Hispanics into companies.
USATODAY Yahoo latest tech icon to reveal lack of diversity
It's "the guy in your dorm, the guy dating your sister, how Larry (Page) and Sergey (Brin) started Google," she says. From that, patterns have emerged over time. White and Asian men fit the stereotypical image of a Silicon Valley engineer or entrepreneur and are more likely to get hired and promoted or funded, they say. That's made it tougher for African Americans and Hispanics to break into Silicon Valley, and once they get the big job or start their own company, they confront obstacles.
USATODAY Voices: Silicon Valley has a diversity deficit
Leah McGowen-Hare, a master technical instructor at Salesforce.com, says companies must venture outside of their comfort zones to find talented engineers and executives who break the Silicon Valley mold. "You have to be intentional. You have to say, 'This doesn't look right. Why don't I have women or women of color on my development team?' It's not just going to happen," said McGowen-Hare, a black female coder. "Diversity and inclusiveness do not come easy. You have to expand your network." Google and Facebook say they are increasing investments in education and outreach to draft more young people into the technology field, especially those who must overcome disadvantages such as poverty, troubled neighborhoods and low-performing schools.
USATODAY Google discloses its (lack of) diversity
These companies are also taking steps to combat unconscious bias by offering training to their employees. Kiva Wilson, a diversity program manager at Facebook, says it's her goal to find "great underrepresented minority talent" and to make sure that Facebook creates an environment "where people feel included, affirmed and valued." "We are seeing nothing short of a seismic shift in our field," said Freada Kapor Klein, founder of the Level Playing Field Institute in Oakland, which works to remove hidden barriers in business. "For years, tech leaders have perpetuated the myth that Silicon Valley is a meritocracy. Once we recognize it as a myth we can get down to the hard work of making the myth a reality." That hard work is only getting started. TD Lowe came to Silicon Valley to start her company in 2012. Shortly after arriving, she excitedly waited for her chance to say hello to a high-profile investor at a Silicon Valley meet-and-greet for young entrepreneurs. Before she could tell him about her start-up, he advised her to forget any aspirations of starting a company and to get a job instead — she would never have the right connections to be successful in Silicon Valley. It was just the first of many times in which technology investors and executives have second-guessed her technology credentials. But that has only made her double down on her company, EnovationNation in Palo Alto, which connects people with ideas to companies who need ideas. "EnovationNation is not a great company because I am a black woman. It is a great company because it is a great product that helps other innovators," she said. New generation Tech workers of color say they are not looking for a handout, just an equal shot at the world's greatest wealth creation machine. Tristan Walker, 29, belongs to a new generation forging a bright future in Silicon Valley. After jobs with Twitter and Foursquare, he's pursuing the Silicon Valley dream by starting his own company, Walker & Co. Brands, a modern personal-care brand for people of color. He says he's targeting a market worth billions but that is woefully underserved. He recently landed $6.9 million in funding from a top venture capital firm — but not before being rejected by every other firm he approached. The experience frustrated him, but he says he has never experienced explicit racial bias in Silicon Valley. "I truly believe that Silicon Valley is meritocratic," Walker said. "No one underestimates anyone else here. You could be walking around in ripped jeans and a dirty T-shirt and be worth a billion dollars. Anyone can do anything pretty important here." And he has set out to prove it. His Palo Alto company asks his investors to recommend qualified candidates who are women and minorities for job openings first. He's been so successful in recruiting from these underrepresented groups that there is only one white man working in his 13-person company. "We joke all the time that I should e-mail our investors and ask them to think of any white men we can hire," Walker said.
]]>
7465 0 0 0
Facebook much like other tech giants is dominated by white males http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/facebook-much-like-other-tech-giants-is-dominated-by-white-males/ Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:38:11 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7470 by Kunbi Tinuoye | June 29, 2014 at 1:38 PM

Facebook has just released its diversity stats for the first time and revealed what most of us already knew.

The social media giant is overwhelmingly white, with the majority of tech and senior roles dominated by males.

The data discloses that Facebook is 69 percent male worldwide and 57 percent white in the United States, where most of its employees are based.

Asians make up 34 percent of staff. Though, figures for Hispanics and African-Americans are dire – 4 percent and 2 percent respectively.

The most lucrative and sought-after jobs are even more skewed: Whites make up 73 percent of management ranks, and men dominate both technical (85 percent) and senior level (77 percent) categories.

“As these numbers show, we have more work to do — a lot more,” Facebook’s global head of diversity, Maxine Williams, wrote in a blogpost. “But the good news is that we’ve begun to make progress.”

“Diversity is something that we’re treating as everyone’s responsibility at Facebook, and the challenge of finding qualified but underrepresented candidates is one that we’re addressing as part of a strategic effort across Facebook.”

Facebook also pledges to work with other organizations working in the trenches to achieve more representative diversity goals.

The statistics come on the heels of similar diversity breakdown reports by Google, Yahoo and LinkedIn, all of which expose that the tech companies heavily skew towards, male, white and Asian.

The reports are compiled as part of a data filed annually with the U.S. government. Companies are not legally required to make the information public.

Even so after Google’s groundbreaking decision to disclose its diversity data, the Silicon Valley giant announced a partnership with the Kapor Center for Social Impact to address a lack of diversity in its workforce.

“For years, tech leaders have perpetuated the myth that Silicon Valley is a meritocracy,” said Freada Kapor Klein, co-chair for the California-based Kapor Center. “Once we recognize it as a myth we can get down to the hard work of making the myth a reality.”

Mitch Kapor, co-chair of the Kapor Center, said diversifying the tech industry will also promote innovation.

“We find that entrepreneurs tend to solve problems based on their lived experience,” said Kapor. “If Silicon Valley represents a narrow slice of society, we end up with a narrow band of solutions.”

“The floodgates holding back the tech industry’s dismal diversity data are now wide open, and what we are finding is that women and people of color are not participants in our rapidly growing tech economy, “ said Allison Scott, Level Playing Field Institute Director of Research and Evaluation.

“Releasing the data is a critical first step,” said Scott. “Silicon Valley must look to invest in strategies to both fill the pipeline with diverse talent, and ensure workplace culture and practices don’t force that talent to leak from the pipeline.”

Disparity in the highly competitive tech industry is even more lopsided when it comes to therepresentation of black women.

“The recent release of Facebook’s diversity figures paints a sobering but realistic picture of the state of African Americans, women, and people of color in technology,” said Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit to introduce girls from underrepresented communities to computer programming.

“While the numbers are disappointing, this is an important step towards starting a meaningful and strategic conversation regarding the diversity challenges in the tech industry.”

For years Silicon Valley firms have held back on sharing diversity records with the public. But in recent weeks several companies led by Google released figures under the scrutiny of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson. He appeared at the shareholder meetings of Facebook and Google to demand companies release the data.

It now seems inevitable there will be growing pressure on other major Silicon Valley companies to make company diversity data available to the public.

]]>
7470 0 0 0
Tech giants pledge to seek more diverse group of employees http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/tech-giants-pledge-to-seek-more-diverse-group-of-employees/ Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:34:36 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7480  
Technology giants have been lifting the curtains on the diversity statistics of their workforces recently and the pictures aren’t pretty: the overwhelming majority working at FacebookGoogleYahoo and LinkedInare male and white, or male and Asian. But the good news is that the companies’ sudden transparency comes with new intentions to seek talent in a wider range of places and to help train students of color in computer sciences. Facebook last week disclosed that 69 percent of its global workforce is male and that 57 percent of its U.S. workforce is white and another 34 percent Asian. Only 2 percent of its U.S. workers are African American and only 4 percent are Hispanic. But before we get all hot under the collar, those percentages are almost identical to Google’s and LinkedIn’s and Yahoo’s.  Google disclosed last month that 70 percent of its global workforce is male.  Meanwhile, exactly 91 percent of employees are white or Asian at each of these three giants, Facebook, Google and LinkedIn. Yahoo is only a miniscule better at 89 percent.  African Americans are 2 percent of employees at each of them. (see above chart for the percentage statistics of each company.) And they all intend to change. “At Facebook, diversity is essential to achieving our mission. We build products to connect the world, and this means we need a team that understands and reflects many different communities, backgrounds and cultures,” said said Maxine Williams, Global Head of Diversity at Facebook Google hired Oakland-based Kapor Center for Social Impact to help it figure out how to diversify its workforce and cultivate a pipeline of computer scientists and engineers starting at high schools. The Kapor Center and Google will also be organizing conferences about these issues. Freada Kapor Klein, co-chair of Kapor and founder of Level the Playing Field Institute which attracts students of color to the sciences, looks upon the past several weeks’ disclosures by tech companies as a huge step forward. “We are seeing nothing short of a seismic shift in our field. For years, tech leaders have perpetuated the myth that Silicon Valley is a meritocracy. Once we recognize it as a myth we can get down to the hard work of making the myth a reality,” she said. Oakland’s social justice community may have gotten the whole conversation started.  Back in the winter, Oakland groups held a huge hackathon, specifically inviting African American youth to participate, but open to anyone.  Hundreds of middle school and high school and college youth attended, joined in groups and created dozens of apps. Mentors from the tech field were on hand to encourage them. techteam Oakland holds a plethora of organizations trying to diversify tech and bring young people from underrepresented demographics into the field close the digital divide: the Hidden Genius Project,YesWeCodeBlack Girls CodeHack the Hood, Level the Playing Field are all based here – as well as the principals behind Pitch Mixer. Google invested $500,000 in Oakland’s Hack the Hood program, which trains low-income youth of color in web design and coding skills, who then help small inner-city businesses get online by building them web sites. Mitch Kapor, co-chair of Kapor Center who played a major role in the Oakland hackathon said after Facebook released numbers: “Diversifying tech is not just good for underrepresented communities, it’s good for tech. We find that entrepreneurs tend to solve problems based on their lived experience. If Silicon Valley represents a narrow slice of society, we end up with a narrow band of solutions.” Yea and nobody wants that.  
]]>
7480 0 0 0
The next thing Silicon Valley needs to disrupt big time: its own culture http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/the-next-thing-silicon-valley-needs-to-disrupt-big-time-its-own-culture/ Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:50:12 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7483 There’s a problem with Silicon Valley and the subcultures that imitate it. It’s a design bug woven into people’s identities and sense of self-worth. Influential and otherwise very smart people will deny till their last breath that it even exists. But I believe it does and should be fixed before it gets any worse.

Since credentials are so important these days, here are mine. I’m a programmer, and a good one. I’ve worked at several companies that went on to be acquired and one that IPO-ed. I’ve founded companies and conducted hundreds of interviews. I’ve written well-respected books, am regularly invited to speak, and have been honored by the White House. I’ve devised novel ways to optimize billion-dollar computer clusters. You’ve almost certainly run code that I wrote.

My résumé wouldn’t get past an initial screen if I were starting my career today.

About 20 years ago I enrolled in a dropout-prevention program at my high school. It allowed me to attend class only half the day. In the afternoons I worked at a startup. The early ’90s were a wild time. Any idiot who could spell “HTML” could get a job and I was one of them. It didn’t matter that I had half a high school diploma and no driver’s license. They gave me a shot and I ran with it.

The general quality and professionalism of programming has gone up since then. That is a good thing. That’s not the problem.

The problem is that Silicon Valley has gone completely to the other extreme. We’ve created a make-believe cult of objective meritocracy, a pseudo-scientific mythos to obscure and reinforce the belief that only people who look and talk like us are worth noticing. After making such a show of burning down the bad old rules of business, the new ones we’ve created seem pretty similar.

It’s even been stated: “The notion that diversity in an early team is important or good  is completely wrong. You should try to make the early team as non-diverse as possible.”

That was Max Levchin, a founder of PayPal. He preaches that mythos to young hopefuls who want to follow his success. His thinking is actually more subtle than that quote, but subtlety and introspection are not common traits among young people out to make a lot of money in a short period of time. Encouragement from billionaire heroes leads to even more insularity.

Because the talent market is tight, that insularity presents a problem. It’s hard to find good people to hire. All the Stanford graduates have offers from multiple companies and there’s no time to develop talent. On the other hand, so many nice-seeming candidates seem to fail the interview process for trivial mistakes that fall under the catch-all category of “culture fit.”

Nerdsplaining

The solution, of course, is not self-reflection or asking hard questions about the values and assumptions that form the process. The solution is to write “explainer” blog posts to initiate candidates into The Culture. As the hiring crunch gets more desperate, examples of this genre are more frequent. They are fascinating documents of just how disconnected insiders have become from the very people they are trying to hire.

Here’s an excerpt from the blog of a San Francisco startup:

I asked her how she was doing in the interview process and she said, “I’m actually still trying to get an interview.”

“That’s weird.” I told her. “I thought you had already met with them a few times.” “Well, I grabbed coffee with the founder, and I had dinner with the team last night, and then we went to a bar together.”

I chuckled. She was clearly confused with the whole matter. I told her, “Look, you just made it to the third round”.

Clearly, the confusion is her fault, right? Let’s review the bidding. A capable professional expressed interest in working for a company. Instead of talking with her about that in plain English, she was held at arm’s length for days while The Culture examined her for defects: coffee dates in the afternoon, conversations over dinner. When she gets the invisible nod, her reward is a “spontaneous” invitation to a night of drinking with the team. You have to wonder why intelligent people would devise an interview process so strange and oblique that the candidate doesn’t even know it’s happening.

On the surface there’s nothing wrong with getting to know a job candidate in a relaxed setting. But think about who might flunk this kind of pre-interview acculturation. Say, people who don’t drink. Or people with long commutes, or who don’t have the luxury of time to stay out late with a bunch of twenty-somethings on a whim. Or, perhaps, people who don’t like the passive-aggressive contempt shown to those who don’t get The Culture.

Ignorance of The Culture is a serious handicap if you want to land a job out here. Another story from same post is very tense (bold mine):

We had a gentleman over to interview for one of our account executive positions… great resume, great cover letter, did well in our initial phone screenHe was dressed impeccably in a suit… I stole a glance to a few of the people from my team who had looked up when he walked in. I could sense the disappointment. It’s not that we’re so petty or strict about the dress code that we are going to disqualify him for not following an unwritten rule, but we know empirically that people who come in dressed in suits rarely work out well for our team. He was failing the go-out-for-a-beer test and he didn’t even know it… I told him he could take off his tie and jacket and loosen up a little bit, and he acknowledged that he felt a little out of place but said that, “you can never overdress for an interview.” Well, dude, no, actually you can overdress for an interview and you just did. Of course I didn’t say it

The cognitive dissonance on display is painful to see. As in: Clothing is totally not a big deal! Because we’re cool like that! But it’s plain that it biased the interviewers. The team’s disappointment upon seeing the suit was immediate and unanimous. If you truly believe that suit equals loser, you can’t help it. Nevertheless, the fiction of objectivity has to be maintained, so he denies it to the candidate’s face, to us, and himself.

Remember that the entire point of his article is to convince candidates to look and act differently: “it’s your responsibility to learn [our] cultural norms.” Presumably that same account exec is supposed to take the hint, dress in mufti, and do better at his next startup interview. But of course, how you dress is totally not a factor in the scientific decision process.

Even if you take his statements at face value they make no sense. Suppose that it’s a scientific fact that wearing a suit signals that a candidate is unfit for duty. Assuming that’s true, then what does teaching the poor bastard how to camouflage himself actually accomplish? Does clothing indicate a person’s inner qualities or not? What, exactly, is the moral we’re supposed to learn from this grubby little drama?

The theme is familiar to anyone who’s tried to join a country club or high-school clique. It’s not supposed to make sense. The Culture can’t really be written about; it has to be experienced. You are expected to conform to the rules of The Culture before you are allowed to demonstrate your actual worth. What wearing a suit really indicates is—I am not making this up—non-conformity, one of the gravest of sins. For extra excitement, the rules are unwritten and ever-changing, and you will never be told how you screwed up.

Clothing is the least of it. Your entire lifestyle and outside interests are under examination, as is your “commitment”. Say you’re asked out for coffee on short notice, which you decline because you’re busy. Is that a “ding”? Did that lose you the job? Who knows? Maybe it did. You’re still trying to figure out what they mean by “wowing” them. Should you ask? Maybe you’ll seem desperate if you ask. Oh, shit!

Again Max Levchin: “PayPal once rejected a candidate who aced all the engineering tests because for fun, the guy said that he liked to play hoops. That single sentence lost him the job.”

The obscurity and arbitrariness are very much by design, and is why explainer posts are supposed to be so valuable. Having engineered an unfair situation, insiders then offer secret guides to winning it.

How to make it in the Valley

As far as I can tell, these are the seven rules to follow if you’re going to have a chance at being snubbed by a Valley Culture startup. The initial gauntlet is not as harsh if you possess trendy technical skills—but that is by no means a free ticket.

  1. Live in the Valley. If you don’t, move. The pioneers who are connecting the global human family and removing barriers of time and space won’t take you seriously unless you brunch at the same restaurants they do. Ideally you should live in “The City,” which is on a peninsula, and not on “The Peninsula,” which is in a valley.
  2. We expect you to click with us “organically,” which means on our schedule. Be flexible with your time. It’s best to behave as though you have nothing better to do all day but wait for us to call you in for coffee or some skateboarding.
  3. Don’t overdress, but don’t underdress. You should mirror as precisely as possible our socioeconomic level, social cues, and idiom. Remember unlucky Mr. Hoops. But no pressure, you know? Laidback.
  4. To distinguish yourself from the throngs, find a way to surprise us that has nothing to do with your ability to perform your job. Maybe you could bring some appropriately quirky luxury foods as tribute.
  5. You are expected to read everything we blog about and work it into the conversation. This shows commitment.
  6. We don’t actually want to talk to you. You need to locate someone else in our social circle and convince them to send us a “warm intro.” This is a wonderfully recursive time-waster, as those people will want a warm intro from someone they know before talking to you, and so on.
  7. We’re objective meritocratic folks and will violently reject any suggestion that we are not. We totally won’t “ding” you for not doing steps 1-6, we swear. But they help. Totally.

Watch yourself

The problem with gathering a bunch of logically-oriented young males together and encouraging them to construct a Culture gauntlet has nothing to do with their logic, youth, or maleness. The problem is that all cliques are self-reinforcing. There is no way to re-calibrate once the insiders have convinced themselves of their greatness.

It’s astonishing how many of the people conducting interviews and passing judgement on the careers of candidates have had no training at all on how to do it well. Aside from their own interviews, they may not have ever seen one. I’m all for learning on your own, but at least when you write a program wrong, it breaks. Without a natural feedback loop, interviewing mostly runs on myth and survivor bias. “Empirically,” people who wear suits don’t do well; therefore anyone in a suit is judged before they open their mouths. “On my interview I remember we did thus and so, therefore I will always do thus and so. I’m awesome and I know X; therefore anyone who doesn’t know X is an idiot.” Exceptions, also known as opportunities for learning, are not allowed to occur. This completes the circle.

You can protest your logic and imparitiality all day long, but the only honest statement is that we’re all biased. The decisions of parole judges, professionals who spend their entire careers making decisions about the fate of others, are measurably affected by whether they had just eaten lunch. And that’s with a much more rigorous and formal process whose rules are in the open. But you’re sure your process is totally solid, right?

If spam filters sorted messages the way Silicon Valley sorts people, you’d only get email from your college roommate. And you’d never suspect you were missing a thing.

This, too, has been stated out loud: “I want to stress the importance of being young and technical. Young people are just smarter.”

I was in the audience when a 22-year-old Mark Zuckerberg led with that drop of wisdom during his first Startup School talk. It wasn’t a slip of the tongue, it was the thesis of his entire 30 minutes on stage. It would have been forgettable startup blah-blah except that his talk followed Mitch Kapor’s. The contrast could not have been more raw. Ironically, Zuckerberg  had arrived late and didn’t hear Kapor speak. He’s since evolved his views, thanks to Sheryl Sandberg’s influence and (ahem) getting older himself.

Kapor is the legendary founder of Lotus, which more or less kicked off the personal computer revolution by making desktop computers relevant to business. He spoke about the dangers of what he called the “mirror-tocracy”: confirmation bias, insularity, and cliquish modes of thinking. He described the work of his institute to combat bias, countering the anecdotes and fantasies that pass for truth with actual research about diversity in the workplace.

The first step toward dissolving these petty Cultures is writing down their unwritten rules for all to see. The word “privilege” literally means “private law.” It’s the secrecy, deniable and immune to analysis, that makes the balance of power so lopsided in favor of insiders.

Calling it out and making fun of it is not enough. Whatever else one can say about the Mirrortocracy, it has the virtue of actually working, in the sense that the lucky few who break in have a decent rate of success. Compared to what, well, that is carefully left unasked. The collateral damage of “false negatives” is as large as it is invisible. But it is difficult to argue with success. It takes a humility and generosity that must come from within. It can’t be forced on others, only encouraged to develop.

Lest you get the wrong idea, I’m not making a moral case but a fairly amoral one. It’s hard to argue against the fact that the Valley is unfairly exclusionary. This implies that there is a large untapped talent pool to be developed. Since the tech war boils down to a talent war, the company that figures out how to get over itself and tap that pool wins.

So the second step is on you. Instead of demanding that others reflect your views, reflect on yourself. Try to remember the last time someone successfully changed your mind. Try, just for a moment, to suppose that it’s probably unnatural for an industry to be so heavily dominated by white and Asian middle-class males under 30 who keep telling each other to only hire their friends. Having supposed that, think about what a just future should look like, and how to get there.

You want a juicy industry to disrupt? How about your own?

]]>
7483 0 0 0
5 Tips to VC Fundraising For the Atypical Founder http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/5-tips-to-vc-fundraising-for-the-atypical-founder/ Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:20:35 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7530 Tristan Walker is CEO of personal grooming company Walker and Co. The affable thirtysomething has the shiny resume one expects of a startup founder. College valedictorian, Stanford MBA, Boston Consulting Group and stints at tech titans like Twitter, Foursquare and Andreessen Horowitz.

Baldwin Cunningham, co-founder of Partnered, has a similarly tech world approved CV. He was a college football player who worked at startups before being accepted to the prestigious Silicon Valley finishing school Y-Combinator.

Both men have gone on to raise money for their popular startups from brand name investors, garnered healthy amounts of PR buzz and solid customer traction. Though in the early days of empire building, both seem the epitome of the classic Silicon Valley success story.

The content of their character might match that of other successful founders but the color of their skin, to paraphrase Martin Luther King Jr, makes them outliers of epic proportions. Walker and Cunningham are black.

While 11 percent of Americans are African-American, a scant 1% of founders of venture-backed companies identify as such. Women are also massively under represented in VC funding, with rates as low as 8% commonly quoted. Other groups, including Hispanic populations, receive so little funding that it is difficult to quantify.

Some of America's most ardent technology users are womenHispanicsand African-Americans but the Silicon Valley elite don’t yet reflect that diversity. Given the homogenous reality of who gets funded, it’s no surprise that Walker’s recent $6.9M round made headlines, as did female founder Kegan Schouwenburg’s recent $6.4M series A for her 3-D printing startup Sols.

To help make this kind of funding more commonplace, we collected tips from Cunningham, fresh off of a $850,000 fundraise of his own, and Ana Diaz-Hernandez, a Latina venture capitalist at Kapor Capital. They shared insights on what it takes to get funded when you’re in an, often times, literal minority.

1. Do your research. Use resources like AngelList or Mattermark to find out which VCs have funded people like you, says Diaz-Hernandez.

2. Lead with the numbers. Investors won’t always understand the problem you’re solving. Make the size of the market opportunity obvious so that the traction isn’t a question.

Related: Venture and Angel Investors

3. Help them help you. Don't forget what investors do, Cunningham said. Some have a strong mission statement to help certain kinds of entrepreneurs, industries, etc., but their job is to get a return on their investment. They have limited partners to return the funds to and need to make money. Make sure your mindset isn’t about them helping you but how can you help them help you.

4. See what others don’t. How you were born, raised and developed forces you to see the world in a certain way, says Cunningham. That influences the problems you’re solving and the approach you take to get there. If what you are building is something investors haven’t thought of, it can work to your advantage. The challenge is explaining it so they understand. The approach and solution can be out of an investor’s comfort zone. Their lack of knowledge makes investors less interested. Simplify your business message and strategy. Make sure everyone can connect with the mission

5. Find ways around lack of access. This is by far the biggest challenge. There are people spearheading different events to bridge the gap to investors but investors make their bet on the founder. That means having relationships. There are people interested in funding specific under-represented groups. Take the opportunity to target them. "My network was jumpstarted through my accelerator network, then I really spent time investing in one-on-one relationships,'' said Cunningham.

While knowing how to find and pitch investors is key to making progress in funding, there is more to winning than networking and strategy. “Assuming you've found product/market fit, continue to believe,'' said Walker. "The large majority of founders will hear way more 'no' than 'yes'. I did. You have to continue to believe in what you're doing. Those "no's" don't always mean your idea is a bad one. It might mean that you're really onto something that others can't see yet. Innovation and opportunity starts with more "no's" than "yes's". Just believe.”

]]>
7530 0 0 0
Oakland's fight to save black boys http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/oaklands-fight-to-save-black-boys/ Tue, 15 Jul 2014 16:40:17 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7539
UPDATED 
Oakland, California— The gunshots. The headlines. The seemingly endless stream of young black men sent to early graves. It all becomes part of the fog that seems to distort the narrative of this city. Once ground zero for the Black Power movement and any number of progressive ideals, Oakland has become more widely regarded as some sort of Camden, New Jersey of the West; a little piece of Detroit nestled on the wrong side of the Bay Bridge. Largely segregated and depressed economically, it sits neglected in the shadow of Silicon Valley and San Francisco. It is America’s robbery capital, where black boys have been as likely to die by the bullet as they are to graduate from high school college-ready. This is the story of Oakland that outsiders are most familiar with. But there’s so much more to the city’s narrative than the fog of pathology and hurt. On the ground there is hope and a whole generation of students, activists and organizations fighting to reclaim and rewrite that story. At the center of this reclamation are black men, a demographic in Oakland and across the country most often the victims of persistent gun violence and myriad social and institutional failings. Nearly four years ago, the Oakland Unified School District launched the office of African American Male Achievement (AAMA) and became the first district in the country to create an office explicitly dedicated to bolstering the lives of black boys. Today it touches hundreds of young lives through its Manhood Development program, an effort that puts black male teachers into classrooms filled with black boys. The instructors serve as mentors who teach critical life skills but also fill the void where many students may not have a father-figure or positive male role model. “We come from revolutionary leaders,” Chris Chatmon, executive director of AAMA told msnbc. “We come from grassroots mobilizing and organizing. I’d like to say right now based on what I’m seeing within the system as a parent and resident in Oakland, there is this quiet storm happening and people are mobilizing. There’s a feeling that failure is not an option.” So far, the efforts have shown modest yet promising signs of success. By being consistent in their lives, loving, open and honest, their whole attitude and outlook on life begins to change, said William Blackwell, an instructor with the AAMA. “I harp on the relationships,” Blackwell said. “The relationships of just knowing that after you’re around these kids day after day, they aren’t just kids, they’re your little nephew, your little cousin, those are your family members.” But the efforts to save, protect and grow positive life outcomes for black boys in this beleaguered city go well beyond the school system. “This is a defining moment and we really cannot afford to let our young men down, we cannot afford to let future generations down and we have to press on,” said Cedric Brown, managing partner at the Oakland-based Kapor Center for Social Impact. In recent years the Kapor Center has funded programs aimed at minority youth to the tune of about $20 million. “We can’t continue on the treadmill we are on now, this kind of cradle to prison pipeline. We cannot continue on that path,” he said. “There is no way to incarcerate every black and brown young man in this country. So why not recognize their value and really try to tap into their value and the worth and potential of the populations that are here. These are deserving young people. And I really believe that.” On a recent afternoon, Joevonte Kelly, 21, of the Black Organizing Project, mused on the dire state of Oakland’s black community. He riddled off a list of ills including police abuse, black-on-black violence and the cycle of incarceration, unemployment and poverty. “You want to talk about peace?” Kelly mused on a recent afternoon. “The 21 years since I been born black people out here don’t know no peace.” But ever since an arrest a few years ago and 5 months in jail, and the impact it had on his own family, he has committed himself to reversing as much of that cycle as he can. “I used to fight myself before I had mentors,” Kelly said on a recent afternoon. “But now that I’m an organizer it’s like, you need a job, you need resources, come talk to me and I’ll help you find what you’re looking for. I know where all that’s at.” He spends many afternoons organizing residents against various local injustices and causes and has become a mentor for younger guys in the neighborhood. Kelly admitted though that his commitment is also closer to home. On that afternoon at the Black Organizing Project headquarters, his younger brother, JaJuan, 14, hung on his every word. When asked who the most important male role model in his life was, JaJuan said his older brother without an ounce of hesitation. “I’ve seen him go through so much stuff,” JaJuan said. “And he made it through it all.” “He’s got his head on right,” Kelly said, gesturing over to his little brother. A big smile spread across the younger boy’s face.
]]>
7539 0 0 0
Can Oakland Avoid Tech Conflicts as Startups Move In? http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/can-oakland-avoid-tech-conflicts-as-startups-move-in/ Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:37:09 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7543 he start-up scene has spilled over from San Francisco into Oakland. The blog Live Work Oakland has created a map showing where all these new tech companies are popping up in the city. The city’s emerging tech industry is trying to cultivate a new brand — one that’s more diverse and has a better relationship with the community. Entrepreneurs, investors and activists are hoping to avoid the “pricing out” of locals and cultural displacement happening in parts of San Francisco.

Like most of the new start-up founders in Oakland, Daniel Rodriguez and his business partner aren’t originally from the city. They came to the Bay Area from Colombia, and they expected to end up in San Francisco.

“When we thought about the U.S., we thought about San Francisco, like the mecca of the Silicon Valley,” he says. “But when we got there, the price of the rent was so high. Even sharing a room was high.”

So instead, the pair moved into West Oakland, a place they had heard about from others in the tech world. Now, they run their start-up out of Impact Hub Oakland. It’s a new shared co-working and event space at Grand and Broadway that’s buzzing with people trying to create the next big thing.

Mitchell Kapor, a venture capitalist also based in Oakland, thinks some of them will succeed.

Kapor, whose Kapor Center for Social Impact is just down the street from Impact Hub, says tech can have a different culture here than it does in San Francisco. He thinks it can be more diverse, socially aware and connected to the community.

“I do not want to be a Pollyanna. I think change is always a challenging process,” Kapor says, then adds: “We are already off to a different start here in Oakland, and that bodes well.”

Entrepreneurs and investors like Kapor are trying to grow local talent. The Hidden Genius Project and Black Girls Code are initiatives in Oakland that help African American youth get involved in tech. Google just gave $500,000 to a charity that teaches low-income kids coding and business skills.

Community organizer Olis Simmons says it’s nice if a few local kids get to learn coding, but that’s not nearly enough if Oakland wants to head off the kind of displacement happening in San Francisco.

“It’s tokenism,” she says. “It’s marketing. It’s public relations.”

Simmons heads Youth Uprising, a neighborhood center in East Oakland, far from downtown. Unemployment there hovers around 20 percent, and the school next door doesn’t have reliable high-speed internet. In order for real change to happen, she says, Oakland needs money for social programs and improving public schools—real investments that would help stabilize her neighborhood. She points out that Google and other big tech companies send billions of dollars in profits overseas to avoid taxes that fund services and education.

“The truth is, if you don’t invest, then over the long haul what you do is you transfer ownership of the city to someone new,” Simmons says.

And she says if that happens in Oakland, there will be conflict, and it will be more severe than the clash over tech in San Francisco.

“I hate to say this. It breaks my heart to say this,” Simmons says. “San Francisco had a very long ramp of displacement and gentrification, that by the time things exploded, the vast majority of the poor people and the people of color were long gone. That’s not true in Oakland. It will happen much more rapidly and it will be a much grittier experience.”

Economist Carol Zabin thinks that distributing the wealth generated by tech could ease the tensions. Zabin is the research director at theUC Berkeley Labor Center. One of the quickest ways to do that, she says, would be raising minimum wage. Higher pay would ensure that when the cost of living increases, regular folks could afford to stay.

“It’s not just about getting into the tech jobs.” Zabin says. “It’s also about improving the jobs that tech creates.”

Zabin’s colleague Enrico Moretti calculates that each tech job eventually creates five additional jobs outside of the innovation sector. The wealth that tech generates leads to the employment of more people in areas like food service and construction. That’s why Zabin says other tech hubs should follow Seattle’s lead.

Seattle is increasing minimum wage to $15 an hour. San Francisco has a similar measure on this November’s ballot.

“What are the economic costs of that?” Zabin asks. “It means those wealthy tech workers have to pay more for their restaurant meals and their retail expenditures, and their services, and not very much more — 1 or 2 or 3 percentage points more when we get a wage jump of 50 or 60 percent.”

The start-up scene is relatively new in Oakland, but the city is already grappling with wage inequality.

In November, Oakland will ask voters to decide whether to increase minimum wage to $12.25 an hour, and in West Oakland, there are protests against two new redevelopment zones that community members fear will speed up gentrification. As more start-ups move in, locals are wondering what roll tech companies will play in these issues.

 
]]>
7543 0 0 0
Silicon Valley barriers, not lack of skills, impede diversity http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/silicon-valley-barriers-not-lack-of-skills-impede-diversity/ Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:40:20 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7563 By Freada Kapor Klein

Facebook has become the latest high-profile tech company to release its diversity numbers. Like Google, Yahoo and LinkedIn before it, Facebook's numbers present a disturbingly homogenous picture. From engineers to accountants, Facebookers are overwhelmingly white or Asian, and decidedly male.

These results are disappointing, but not surprising. For all its promise and opportunity, Silicon Valley has long been insular, clubby and steeped in the pernicious myth of the meritocracy. We are colorblind and gender-blind, the story goes, and we only hire the best talent available.

But if we accept that on its face, are we to conclude that blacks, Latinos and women of all backgrounds are simply not as smart as white and Asian men, or that genius is disproportionately concentrated in race-based subsets of the population?

Of course not. Yet, until now, so many of the solutions to the tech-pipeline problem have focused on changing behavior within the underrepresented populations themselves.

The reality is that most of the barriers are structural. Even for those with the requisite skills, the unwritten rules still deny them access. How are young black and Latino men supposed to learn Silicon Valley's cultural cues if they have had no access? How are women supposed to walk the fine line between being perceived as unconfident and too aggressive if only insiders know where that line exists? The lack of a "warm introduction" also serves as a barrier for underrepresented communities.

Even if the candidate makes it past these barriers, then the excuse of "not a good culture fit" will be applied and likely knock them out of the running. Simply put, one cannot lean in if one is locked out.

As research has borne out again and again, women are frequently perceived to be less competent in science no matter what they do. A 2012 National Academy of Sciences study described a subtle but persistent bias that shadows women entering scientific professions. Faculty hirers, men and women alike, tend to favor male over female applicants for entry-level lab positions. While they found female applicants "likable," the men were perceived to be more competent, worth higher salaries and, crucially, more deserving of mentoring.

This problem is amplified for women of color. In a 2013 study of adolescent women in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields by the Level Playing Field Institute, girls of color were found to be far less likely to have access to science resources and facilities at school, and also were limited by stereotypes based both on gender and race.

In a classic 2003 experiment, economists Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan sent two sets of nearly identical resumes to employers, the only difference being the names at the top: Greg, Emily, Jamal and Lakisha. While the researchers anticipated minor differences between the two groups, Greg and Emily received fully 50 percent more callbacks than Jamal and Lakisha. Women like Lakisha aren't just fighting for a seat at the table; they are still struggling to get in the door.

In a less explicit but equally pernicious way, many job seekers find themselves weeded out of the hiring process by violating the unspoken rules of Silicon Valley culture, like wearing a suit to an interview or not being interested in drinks with the twentysomething bosses. Indeed, ageism in tech has led to a plastic surgery boom in the Silicon Valley.

Our sector is permeated by biases, both subtle and not so subtle. We should be encouraged that some of the largest companies in Silicon Valley have taken the first step toward dealing with the issue, but real solutions will require a long-term commitment to a deep cultural change.

Silicon Valley's diversity problems are systemic, and no amount of individual coaching is going to change that. It's time to address the biases that permeate all aspects of the pipeline.

Freada Kapor Klein is co-chair of the Kapor Center for Social Impact and the author of "Giving Notice: Why the Best and Brightest Are Leaving the Workplace and How You Can Help them Stay." To comment, submit your letter to the editor via our online form at www.sfgate.com/submissions/#1.

]]>
7563 0 0 0
Next To Silicon Valley, Nonprofits Draw Youth Of Color Into Tech http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/next-to-silicon-valley-nonprofits-draw-youth-of-color-into-tech/ Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:20:18 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7567
Aarti Shahani/NPR

Twenty-year-old Taneka Armstrong wants to land a high-tech job, but her day starts at Taco Bell.

Armstrong stands behind a steel counter, making Burrito Supremes and ringing up customers. She counts pennies and quarters. She also gets orders from her bosses, who she says can be pretty condescending.

"They're just like, 'Oh, did you know that already?' Or, 'Can you do this?' " she says. "Yes, I've been doing it, for almost a year now."

Armstrong is a native of Oakland, Calif., next door to Silicon Valley, and she lives two lives. This first one, which starts as early as 5 a.m., doesn't challenge her or pay well. And that's why she set off in search of life No. 2: learning tech skills.

That's not an easy path, though. Technology companies have a problem when it comes to employee diversity. The workforce at places like Google and Facebook is overwhelmingly white and male.

To counter that, a growing number of nonprofits are popping up in Oakland to help young blacks and Latinos break into the industry.

The Goal Is Exposure

Every afternoon this summer, Armstrong is in the offices of a small nonprofit called Hack the Hood. Her job is to fix websites for clients.

"I'm trying to do an outline," she says, staring at a page on her laptop that has a lot of links. "You click on it, it takes you everywhere in the world. I like short and simple."

This summer, the teens will meet top talent from the companies that make the popular apps they download. Armstrong says there's some chance she'll get deep into coding. Or she might prefer a nontechnical job, like sales and marketing.

That exploration is part of the process, says instructor Zakiya Harris.

"Nobody ever asks young people that come from affluent neighborhoods why they're doing programs, because the notion is it's exposure," she says. "The more you expose young people to opportunities, the better they're going to become as adults."

She wants to find ways to empower young people with "low-hanging fruit" — skills in the tech industry. That way, she says, "they can start earning some money in their pocket that's going to actually lead to a career, and not just a dead-end opportunity in a service job."

In Search Of Funding

These big ideas come with a small budget line. That's where people like Freada Kapor Klein come in. She's an investor in Silicon Valley and a leading philanthropist for coding nonprofits.

Her Kapor Center for Social Impact is tracking new and growing programs. Klein says the sheer number is increasing rapidly, but "it's unclear how to measure their effectiveness."

Her foundation gives a few million dollars a year. That scale of contribution is rare. She estimates that "foundations are giving tens of thousands of dollars, and in the aggregate you might be getting hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Google recently awarded Hack the Hood a half-million dollars for being a winner in its Bay Area nonprofit competition. The tech company has been studying why women don't enter computer science, and has pledged to give $50 million overall to programs in the U.S. and abroad that try to recruit women.

Klein is talking to Twitter and others about the factors that make tech a "tilted playing field." She's asking them to step up their game.

"What's going to distinguish tech companies going forward is who takes this seriously and who doesn't," she says.

For her part, Armstrong is taking the work seriously. With Hack the Hood last summer, she experienced the challenge of pitching services. Her team would go door-to-door offering to build websites for local business owners. "What's the catch?" they'd ask. She'd explain over and over, "No, it's free. We're a nonprofit."

Armstrong says that process can feel weird, but it's better than making burritos.

]]>
7567 0 0 0
Obama’s My Brother’s Keeper initiative gets $104 million boost http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/obamas-my-brothers-keeper-initiative-gets-104-million-boost/ Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:20:02 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7571 Six months since the launch of My Brother’s Keeper — the president’s boldest effort since taking office to address the dire state of young minority men — Obama is set to announce that millions are being dedicated to expanding the initiative.

According to a White House official, Obama will announce Monday at the Walker Jones Education Center in Washington new partnerships with public and private groups to the tune of about $104 million. That money will help this demographic succeed at critical stages throughout their lives – from early education to college and career.

Young minority men generally faces some of the worst social, academic and economic outcomes in the country.

“Tomorrow’s announcements are an important next step in continuing to build ladders of opportunity for all and to highlight the President’s commitment to ensuring that all children have a fair shot to succeed in this country,” a White House official said.

What is My Brother's Keeper?

The new private partner organizations include the NBA and NBA’s player and retired players association, AT&T, the Emerson Collective, The College Board, Citi Foundation, and Discovery Communications. 

Obama assembled the My Brother’s Keeper Task Force and charged them with spending the next few months combing through data and best practices in preparation for a massive scaling-up of national efforts.

The administration convened some of the wealthiest foundations and philanthropists in the country and secured about $200 million to identify and bolster efforts that are working nationally to help boys and men of color while also developing new strategies. The efforts center around disrupting what many in the philanthropic space refer to as the cradle-to-prison pipeline that disproportionately siphons off minority boys from as early as pre-Kindergarten.

The NBA groups have pledged support for a new public service campaign primarily designed to recruit 25,000 minority male mentors. AT&T has pledged $18 million this year to support mentoring and educational programs as part of a broader $350 million commitment targeted at students at risk of dropping out of school. The Emerson Collective has committed $50 million to work with school districts to launch a competition to find the best designs for high schools of the future.

The College Board will invest more than $1.5 million for an initiative called “All In,” a program to help ensure that 100% of African-American, Latino and Native-American students with strong advanced placement potential are enrolled in AP classes before graduation.

“… this situation has grown so dire, particularly around violence that has affected our young men in communities and this cradle to prison pipeline.”
CEDRIC BROWN ON MY BROTHER'S KEEPERS INITIATIVE

The Citi Foundation is committing $10 million over the next three years to create a national volunteer program to help 25,000 young people in 10 cities across the country develop college and career readiness skills. And Discovery Communications will invest more than $1 million to create original programming to breakdown stereotypes and negative public perception of boys and men of color.

The Chicago-based Becoming A Man program, which consists mostly of black boys and was instrumental in spurring Obama to take bold new action aimed at at-risk boys following the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s killer, George Zimmerman, pledged an additional $10 million in new funding to My Brother’s Keeper.

The new partnerships and funding also includes a number of government agencies and efforts. The Corporation for National and Community Service and the Department of Justice will jointly fund a $10 million, three year AmeriCorps program to enroll disconnected youth. And the USDA will be teaming up with AmeriCorps to offer $3.8 million to give youth opportunities to help restore the nation’s forests and grasslands.

In May, the task force released its first report to the president, in which they outlined a broad set of guiding principles and recommendations. The recommendations include launching a national mentor-recruiting campaign, eliminating suspensions and expulsions of preschoolers, encouraging a culture of reading at home, and growing youth summer programs and pre-apprenticeships.

The President’s effort to help young minority men and boys is one that White House officials say will be central to the president and First Lady’s life after leaving office. But that effort hasn’t gone without controversy. Many critics have wondered how much vigor will be put into the program once Obama leaves office, and if it will survive the next administration. And several prominent African-American men and women have criticized the administration for not including girls of color who also face disproportionately bad outcomes. Others balked at the initial $200 million commitment, arguing that the great issues facing minority boys requires maximum resources.

The administration and funders of My Brother’s Keeper have said time and again that the efforts toward minority men and boys is based on empirical data that highlights this group as the most effected on many key indicators, including incarceration, poverty and violent crime rates.

“I think that the desire to focus on black men and boys really grew out of smaller groups of people coming together to say, this situation has grown so dire, particularly around violence that has affected our young men in communities and this cradle to prison pipeline,” Cedric Brown, managing partner at the Kapor Center for Social Impact, told msnbc recently. “This isn’t a matter of trying to order the priorities necessarily. The question is how do we build something that’s parallel or combined, how can we have these movements run adjacent to one another and build upon one another.”

Brown, whose organization was among the group of original My Brother’s Keeper funders, said the initiative has raised the volume and level of discourse around the plight of boys of color.

“It gave a sense of urgency around needing to get a plan, a framework together and out there and moving forward in a way that was going to be responsive to real issues that young men are facing in communities and not going to be more talk not going to be another blue-ribbon panel, but this was actually going to work,” Brown said. “This was actually going to change things and get us as a nation on the road to increasing the opportunities of men and boys of color.”

]]>
7571 0 0 0
Why Diversity In Tech Matters: 'People Solve Problems That They See' http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/why-diversity-in-tech-matters-people-solve-problems-that-they-see/ Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:13:09 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7596

Host Michel Martin talks to a roundtable of activists and innovators about the future of technology, and recruiting the next generation of African-Americans and Latinos into the tech field.

Copyright © 2014 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

LISTEN TO THE STORY HERE

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

This is TELL ME MORE from NPR News. I'm Michel Martin. If you've been following the program, then you know we have a very deep interest in technology - how it's created, how it's used and how it affects the country. We've been particularly interested in groups that haven't had as much access to this vital area. In our "Women in Tech" and "Blacks in Tech" series on Twitter and on the radio, we've been able to experience in real-time the impact of so called minorities and women are making on this country's science and technology engine. And I think it is fair to say the engagement we generated close to 200 million impressions on Twitter demonstrates incredible appetite for knowledge about the contributions of these thought-leaders, entrepreneurs and scientists. And as our program winds down, you know our last program is August first, we wanted to touch base on some of these important issues a least one more time. So we've called upon Ben Jealous. He is the former president and CEO of the NAACP. He recently joined Kaper Capital. It is a Bay Area group that invests in social-impact tech startups. He's with us now in our Washington D.C. studios. Once again, welcome back.

BEN JEALOUS: Thank you, it's good to be back.

MARTIN: And your new incarnation. James Oliver, Jr. is the founder of WeMontage and was part of our "Blacks in Tech" series. He joins us from WHID which is in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Welcome back to you Mr. Oliver.

JAMES OLIVER JR: Thank you, it's good to be here.

MARTIN: And also joining us, entrepreneur Francesca Escoto of Latina Startup Tour. She joins from WUSF which is in Tampa, Florida. Francesca Escoto, welcome to you as well. Thank you for joining us.

FRANCESCA ESCOTO: Thank you for having me. It's great to be here.

MARTIN: So Ben Jealous, let me start with you. When you left the NAACP to join Kaper Capital - does this tie into your civil rights background in some way or is this just a fresh start for you?

JEALOUS: You know - look - I think it's both. I think it's both and I think like most people, the first 10 years of my professional life I excelled because I was willing to do things that were new every day if possible. And in the second decade I excelled because I found a few things I was better at than most and was willing to them over and over. So this is exciting to me personally because - it's - it's an opportunity to - to do something in a new way, but it's something I've been doing for a long time, which is trying to figure out fairly simple ways to solve big social problems for hundreds of thousands or millions of people. And some of the issues that we're dealing with at K-Cap are precisely the same I dealt with at the NAACP. But we're finding more effective ways to actually move the ball forward. I'll give, you know...

MARTIN: Just give me one example.

JEALOUS: Sure. The cost of inmates calling home is something I was dealing with the FCC with on for years and we just never seemed to get very far because there's a whole lot of profit in it. It can cost up to $3 per minute.

MARTIN: Per minute?

JEALOUS: ...Per minute to call home, depending on where you are. So at K-Cap we've supported a guy named Frederick and Frederick has a company called Pigeonly. And Pigeonly has disrupted the market for inmates calling home from - from first federal prisons and now state prisons dramatically - dropping the cost by about 90%.

MARTIN: So you don't have to go through the whole regulatory hoops - the flight hoops.

JEALOUS: That's exactly right.

MARTIN: You just find a technological solution to the problem.

JEALOUS: He just took - he just took Google Voice-type technology and used it to help folks who are imprisoned get a phone number that is local to the prison but connected to their home thousands of miles away, and cut the calling home by about 90 percent in the process. You know, similarly we have a company up in Washington Heights called Regalii. They've cut the cost of people sending money home to a foreign country also by about 90 percent versus Western Union -and made it safer. You know, in the past, look - and - and even for many people right now - when they want to send money home, say to the Dominican Republic, it cost them about 30 percent. But also, you know, their grandmother who is waiting, is waiting at a storefront window where people have her marked the moment she walks out and they know she is cash in her pocket. What Regalii have done is cut that cost, but also made it possible to transfer the funds on the cell phone.

MARTIN: OK, I think we - I think we get it. One of the other efforts that the Kapor Center is supporting is an effort to take tech tools directly to Latino communities around the country. Francesca Escoto is part of that. So, Francesca, why don't you tell us about the Latina Startup Tour.

ESCOTO: Absolutely, yeah. First of all, thank you to Kapor for what they are doing. They are very intentional about identifying talent in communities of color and supporting it through both development training but also financially. What the Latina Startup Tour aims to do - we're reaching 800 women in eight cities in 2014, and the goal is to bring the training to them. We deal with both a gap in technology access but also language access, and so there's a lot of lingo that is built up and whether you call them accelerators, incubators, whatever - throughout Silicon Valley. Well, that doesn't reach our communities and it doesn't reach them in a language or at an academic level that they can fully grasp and so we are taking that on the road and we're making sure that we bring that to Latinas. We are the fastest-growing entrepreneur segment in the U.S. We are starting businesses at a faster pace than any other group and what we're trying to do is bring awareness to these Latina mothers, in many cases, and recent immigrants that - you know, you make a dress, you're seamstress. You make 50 dresses, you're really good seamstress, you make 100 dresses, you're into garment manufacturing. You make...

MARTIN: So what's the plan here? Is the plan to allow - to - to - to give people opportunities to understand how technologies can improve their existing businesses? Is it to try to encourage people to encourage their children to pursue STEM careers? What's the - what's the goal of this immediate project here?

ESCOTO: The goal here is to help Latinas see themselves, not only as users, but also creators of technology. And to see their businesses as opportunities to embrace technology and to become partakers of the tech startup economy.

MARTIN: OK. James Oliver, Jr., you were part of our "Blacks in Tech" series back December of 2013 and I do want to hear about your company and what you're doing but I'm also - I'm really interested in this whole question of what - the whole question of diversity in the tech field. What would make - what makes a difference in getting more people of different backgrounds into this field? So briefly, I understand that WeMontage - am I - am I pronouncing it properly?

OLIVER JR: Yeah, you are.

MARTIN: And you - it - it makes - tell me what you do. You can create, what? Big wall display art with family photos, right?

OLIVER JR: Kind of, yeah. So it's the only website on the Internet that I know of, that will let you take your pictures and turn them into large custom photo collages on removable wallpaper.

MARTIN: And -and that's particularly helpful, say if you have family members who are in assisted living or nursing homes or something like that.

OLIVER JR: Oh, yeah.

MARTIN: So it's to jog their memories. it's also of a size where it's easy to see.

OLIVER JR: Yeah college dorm kids - dorm students as well, exactly. Just - you know, really any place you want to display photos or you can't put nails in the wall, like people in military housing, when they move out they have to pay fees - move-out fees for putting holes in the wall - but anybody who's a picture enthusiast, it's an affordable alternative to things like popular canvas wraps, as well as picture frames, which are incredibly expensive for custom framing.

MARTIN: What - what gave you the idea for this? I'm just wondering - forgive me - I don't mean to be crude about it, but do you think your background had something to do - your own identity had something to do with what gave you the idea?

OLIVER JR: Oh, my God, no. It was actually my wife was watching an interior design show on television and they were in the basement covering the wall with these big black-and-white collages and for me, that was really a moment of inspiration. And I say inspiration - I mean that in like the spiritual sense. It was like a huge ah-ha moment for me. But in terms of why thought I could do that - my background is not tech-oriented. I'm the guy that wants to start up a tech company but doesn't know how to write a lot of code but I would attribute that to my mom who taught me ever since I was a kid, that I could do whatever I put my mind to and then - I went to Morehouse College and graduated a million years ago, I'm not going to say when, but, you know, going to Morehouse - they instill in you a certain confidence and I think, you know, a combination of my mom and - is - something really stubborn about me because I'm a Taurus and just I believe I can, you know, persist and these things done.

MARTIN: But - Ben, I was going to go back to this whole question of the diversity in the field and why do you think this - why does it matter?

JEALOUS: Well, you know, it gets actually to what you were just talking about, which is that it's not so much about identity as it is about your lived life - what you experience. People solve the problems that they see. When you talk about somebody who starts a new - a new business it's because they're trying to scratch their own itch. And so, if you're in San Francisco there is not just one startup, there are probably 10 startups for every problem that a rich person has. If you go across the bridge to Oakland where - where we have our offices there's a whole bunch of problems waiting to be solved and there's not even one startup to solve them. What you see with a Pigeonly, with a - a Regalii, even with a WeMontage is - is somebody's seeing something that most of the folks who are of the class, if you will, starting startups these days don't see. And for us...

MARTIN: So they wouldn't necessarily think about what it's like to have to pay a fee to take something off the walls, so it would not necessarily occur to them that this is a problem.

JEALOUS: Yes, exactly.

MARTIN: They wouldn't necessarily understand.

JEALOUS: Because when you're packing up in Pac Heights, you don't - you don't pay a fee to take something off the walls, right? But...

MARTIN: Good.

JEALOUS: ...The key point here is that there's profit in that. Because most people are like the people in Oakland if you will...

ESCOTO: I got...

JEALOUS: You know, and not like the people in Pac Heights and increasingly throughout San Francisco.

MARTIN: Francesca, you wanted to say something?

ESCOTO: Well, yeah. I'm like bursting here. That's exactly it. What happens is we, are solving problems, we're just not calling it technology. And so we are marginalized to some extent, either by ourselves or society - there's a lot of factors that go into that - but we are solving problems, we're are not calling it what it is, so we're not participating in all the full extent of this economy. So what we're doing - and I think that it's the same thing that the other gentlemen are talking about - what we're doing is - OK, you don't know how to code, guess what? It's OK, because you could still solve this problem. There are people who can code. What you need to bring to the table is the idea. You need to bring the problem and we'll help you get the tools and the resources to solve the problem.

MARTIN: James, what about you? And I'm also particularly interested in whether you feel as a - as an African-American entrepreneur that there - are other obstacles for you that don't exist for others like you? I mean, for example is it a question of whether you put your own picture on your website?

OLIVER JR: That's a great question. Just circling back to what she said, I think she's right and fortunately for me, I was really fortunate enough to get into a tech accelerator in Wisconsin called Generator. And you know, they were very helpful in helping me bring the idea to the market with access to resources, credibility etc. - and raising capital. But yeah, I mean, there're a couple things I think about that I don't think the average entrepreneur thinks about. Like for example, like you said on our website are twins who, you know - have African-American twins who are just beautiful - they're 18 months - well, I think they're beautiful, and that's the feature image on the website. And just, you know - I wonder sometimes if, you know, that could that be hurting my business. You know, I don't know, but I'm not changing it because I love my kids.

MARTIN: I hear you. They are gorgeous.

OLIVER JR: Thank you.

MARTIN: Let me give a final thought to Ben Jealous here. Could you tell us - I promised I would ask you about the Impact Generation, what does that mean?

JEALOUS: We have a rising generation in this country that is totally wired - that knows that they can make a huge profit, but that that also wants to make the world better at the same time. And you know, I have faith that that generation will ultimately get, sort of capitalism in our country back to what it was supposed to be a long time ago when it was about people in villages making the most of their possibilities. Back then if you will, who you were - your reputation had something to do with whether or not you were successful. Today, you actually have to be very intentional if you want to bring, sort of who you are, and what you're about, and how you make money, into one place.

MARTIN: Alright, well let's hear more about this in the future - we hope we'll be talking more about this in the future. I'm speaking with Ben Jealous of the Kapor Center for social impact and Kapor Capital - former president and CEO of the NAACP. James Oliver Jr., is the founder of the WeMontage. Francesca Escoto of Latina Startup Tour. They were all here with us today. Thank you all for joining us today.

JEALOUS: Thank you.

ESCOTO: Thank you.

OLIVER JR: Thanks.

 
]]>
7596 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
In Silicon Valley diversity conversations, age is left out http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/in-silicon-valley-diversity-conversations-age-is-left-out/ Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:43:34 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7602 Often criticized for its lagging workforce diversity, Silicon Valley appears to be feeling the pressure. Over the past three months, a half-dozen leading tech companies have released diversity numbers, accompanied by pledges to improve them. Still others have promised to follow suit.

But one set of statistics has been noticeably absent: the age of those companies' workers.

Silicon Valley's conversation about diversity has revolved chiefly around gender and race, although the stereotype of the techie as white, male and young has written out the over-40 set as well.

"Walk into any hot tech company and you'll find disproportionate representation of young Caucasian and Asian males," said Ed Lazowska, who holds the Bill & Melinda Gateschair in Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington. "All forms of diversity are important, for the same reasons: workforce demand, equality of opportunity and quality of end product."

The Chronicle requested employees' age data from the seven tech companies that have recently released diversity reports: Google, Pinterest, Salesforce, Twitter, Yahoo, Facebook and LinkedIn. All either declined to provide the information or did not respond to the request.

Requests for diversity data were also made to more than a dozen additional companies. Only one, Hewlett-Packard, shared information related to workforce age, which it has published in an annual report since 2001. At HP, a quarter of its U.S. employees are 30 or younger, more than half are between 31 and 50 and about 18 percent are over 51.

Several companies noted that the numbers they released publicly were the same numbers that they are required to report to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. And though the commission is responsible for enforcing laws against workforce discrimination, including age discrimination, the rules requiring companies to report diversity breakdowns to the government are tied specifically to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which does not cover age.

Data not tracked

Age discrimination is prohibited in California by both the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. But the government doesn't track age diversity in the workplace.

Freada Kapor Klein, who co-chairs Oakland's Kapor Center for Social Impact, said that framing discussions about diversity around legal requirements risks defining diversity too narrowly.

"Tech companies should be releasing descriptions of their workforce in all dimensions," she said. "Age is one very important demographic that signals whether or not a company has an inclusive culture. It's important alongside race, gender and sexual orientation."

A first step

The loud push for Silicon Valley companies to make public their federally reported diversity data stems from a hope that disclosing such information is a first step toward valley employers changing their ways.

Silicon Valley's mantra has long been that tech is a meritocracy, but the numbers belie that. There are few qualified minority and female technology experts to begin with, but often the tech world has not welcomed those who manage to get in.

Though there are plenty of visible people over 40 in top tech jobs (most of them men), there have also been several age discrimination lawsuits against major companies, and frequent reports of employers and funders passing on older workers in favor of younger ones.

Valley mythology

The young hoodie-clad startup founder is deeply embedded in Silicon Valley mythology. On websites like Quora, queries such as "If you are 30, are you too old to start a company?" are common. And without the data, it's hard to tell how much of a problem age discrimination is.

Last year, PayScale reported that of 32 tech companies it surveyed, just six had a workforce with a median age greater than 35. Most of those were older, more established companies such as IBM and Dell. The Chronicle queried companies this year about the median age of their employees, and only two provided answers: Autodesk and Cisco, whose median ages are 40 and 40 1/2.

This week, The Chronicle also requested diversity data from HP, Adobe, Apple, eBay, Pandora, Square, Dropbox, Zendesk, Tesla, Oracle, Intel and Netflix. EBay said it would release numbers soon, but that they would not include age. Pandora and Apple also said they will release them, though they would not specify what the content will include. Adobe publishes its gender number annually, but declined to provide anything more.

No data

Square, Dropbox, Zendesk, Tesla and Oracle declined to provide any data. Intel and Netflix did not respond.

Lazowska, the University of Washington computer scientist, said that Google deserves much credit for being the first company to publish its data.

But he underscored the importance of including age as a measure of diversity - and the value that diversity brings to the workplace.

"You don't need to believe in these things in order to believe in the value of diversity - all you need to do is want the best possible product," he said.

Kristen V. Brown is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail:kbrown@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @kristenvbrown

]]>
7602 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Hardware Startup Birdi Seeded to Build a Better Smoke Alarm http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/hardware-startup-birdi-seeded-to-build-a-better-smoke-alarm/ Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:49:51 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7604 CNRY Inc., better known as Birdi, raised $700,000 in new seed funding to build a better smoke alarm, Venture Capital Dispatch has learned.

The company’s first product, still in a prototype and testing phase, is a “smart” smoke detector and air-quality monitor that communicates with and is managed by iOS or Android mobile devices.

The product bears more than a passing resemblance, and a similar idea, to another hardware startup—smart thermostat maker Nest Labs Inc., which Google acquired earlier this year for $3.2 billion.

Formerly known as Canary, Birdi took a new path to seed funding that is becoming increasingly common among hardware startups.

They drafted the concept for their device and affiliated apps at the CleanWeb Hackathon, where they took home a $1,500 prize. Then, they raised additional money, about $73,000 minus 4% in fees, through a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo.com.

They also graduated from a hardware-focused incubator, Highway1 (run by PCH International), which mentored founders Justin Alvey and Mark Belinsky on everything from product design to materials science and manufacturing, and gave them $20,000 in convertible debt financing to get started.

Only then did Birdi embark on seed fundraising. They connected with investors online and offline, who could see a well-honed prototype and demand at least among early adopters, Mr. Belinsky said. Having completed the Indiegogo campaign first made seed fundraising relatively easy, he said.

Investors in Birdi’s seed round included Jason Calacanis and his AngelList syndicate,Kapor Capital; Eric Ries; and John Galbraith.

Mr. Calacanis said that besides the “obvious market [demand]” for air-quality measurement, he feels it is his role, as an angel investor, to “believe in” and fund “startups on the brink” of significant traction ahead of when institutional VCs would typically fund a hardware maker.

Since starting up, Birdi has moved from New York to San Francisco, and ditched its original name, Canary, because, Mr. Belinksy said, “canaries die in an emergency. We prefer ‘a little bird told me,’ [as a concept].”

Installed much like a smoke detector in a user’s home, the Birdi detects and sends users alerts to their mobile phones when the air in their homes is thick with pollen, carbon monoxide, pollutants, or if there are signs of a fire.

Users who subscribe to additional services can have the Birdi call a landline to alert other residents–like grandparents, children and others who aren’t likely to use smartphones–if there is a troubling condition in the home. Premium-service subscribers can also have the Birdi automatically call 911 if a fire is detected, say, when they are traveling internationally and cannot be connected by mobile phone.

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="282"] The Birdi Smart Air Monitor can automatically call 911. 
getbirdi.com[/caption]

Tech entrepreneur and investor Mitch Kapor said he backed Birdi because of its “dual focus on safety and health” and the “air-quality monitoring aspect” of their product, which he views as an important and competitive differentiator.

Overall, Kapor Capital is interested in connected devices that are “directly improving the well-being of the species,” and can make a “positive social impact.”

The firm regularly scouts deals via incubators including Highway1 and about a half-dozen others, and watches crowdfunding sites for breakout campaigns that could become impressive companies, he said.

Mr. Belinsky says Birdi will use its seed funding to hire full-time staff, move into a new office in San Francisco, and advance their device through various tests with UL LLC(the safety and environmental standards organization). It plans to then manufacture and ship its first complete Birdi systems to early customers in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Write to Lora Kolodny at lora.kolodny@wsj.com. Follow her on Twitter at@lorakolodny

]]> 7604 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Pigeonly's CEO helps prison inmates http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/pigeonlys-ceo-helps-prison-inmates/ Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:32:44 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7609 LAS VEGAS – Not far from the slot machines and neon lights of the Strip, a few dozen tech companies hammer away at the future in a downtown area revitalized by Zappos founder Tony Hsieh.

But you can bet that no founder here has a stranger story than Pigeonly CEO Frederick Hutson.

In the fall of 2007, Hutson, now 30, was flush with success from a business that distributed marijuana when a dozen Drug Enforcement Administration officers pulled up to his A-OK Mail Center with guns drawn.

"They put me in handcuffs and arraigned me at the courthouse just down the street from where I sit now," says Hutson, offering an embarrassed smile. "I don't know that I've changed, because I still have a high tolerance for risk and a desire to solve problems creatively. But I have matured."

Hutson did 51 months in jail. He came out with a determination to make it big legitimately, and an innovative idea of how to do so.

Pigeonly helps inmates stay connected with family by providing them simple ways to receive hard-copy photographs and place inexpensive long-distance phone calls. Its secret sauce is a proprietary 50-state prisoner database that makes locating inmates as easy as typing their names in a search box.

Ultimately, Hutson envisions building a suite of Pigeonly services for inmates and their families that could include listings of employers and rental agencies that work with ex-cons and a financial services arm that would cater to the 30% of Pigeonly customers who do not have bank accounts.

"I know the population I'm building this business for, and that's my advantage," Hutson says of the 2.3 million men and women currently behind bars and their kin. "You put all those people together, and that's a large market. But more importantly, I saw firsthand that inmates who stayed in touch had a better chance of not going back to jail after they got out."

Connectivity with the outside world is crucial to the fight against prison recidivism, says David Fathi, director of the ACLU's National Prison Project.

"Nearly 95% of prisoners are coming home, so what kind of people do we want back in society?" he says. "A successful re-entry is always linked to how well an inmate kept in touch with the outside world. To the extent that a company (like Pigeonly) can mitigate the harsh and stressful world of prison and give people that sense of self through contact, that is very positive."

What sets Pigeonly apart from most start-ups is the $1 million in seed funding it has received from top Silicon Valley players such as Lotus creator Mitch Kapor.

"Frederick is a stellar example of entrepreneurs who pursue business opportunities that come out of their own experience," says Kapor, whose Kapor Capital is the investment arm of the Kapor Center for Social Impact in Oakland.

"You could hang out at Stanford University until the end of time and not find someone like Frederick, which is why it is so important to cast a wide net when it comes to funding," he says. "But simply put, his was one of the best founder presentations I'd seen in a long time."

Hutson has always been a hustler. Growing up in Brooklyn with a single mother and three siblings, he helped supplement the family income — which was anchored to a restaurant his mother ran out of their apartment — by doing fix-it jobs for neighbors.

After a move to St. Petersburg, Fla., where he attended high school, Hutson enlisted in the Air Force and worked on F-16 fighter jet engines out of Nellis Air Force Base outside of Las Vegas.

When the Air Force looked to downsize in 2006, Hutson received an early and honorable discharge. Ever the entrepreneur, he bought and sold a series of small local businesses — window tinting, cellphone accessories — when an old Florida friend told him about his marijuana-smuggling enterprise.

Hutson thought he could find a better way, and he agreed to help. "I thought I was smarter; I felt I was just fixing a business problem," Hutson says softly.

Soon, using FedEx, UPS and other shipping services as unwitting mules, the enterprise was netting him upwards of $500,000 a year. A fancy Las Vegas house, cars and jewelry followed. "At first, I just wanted to make enough to start a few new legitimate companies," he sighs. "Then it was just about having fun. I was 21. Dumb. One of the UPS drivers rolled on us. The DEA showed up."

The stigma associated with a prison term remains very real. Hutson experienced it last year when he tried to rent an apartment in the same Las Vegas building that houses Pigeonly's offices, succeeding only after he got a few co-signers on the lease.

But more broadly speaking, those coming out of jail today "don't face quite the same thing that people did 20 or 30 years ago, perhaps just because there are so many people cycling in and out of jail now," says Paul Wright, a former convict who is founder and editor of Prison Legal News in Lake Worth, Fla.

"A lot of former prisoners try and start companies, some of which are aimed at the prison population," he says. "But more than the most, the tech industry doesn't seem to care as much about your background. It's mainly, 'Do you have a business plan, and can you program?' If the answer's yes, many are happy to hear you out."

Another big Hutson investor, Erik Moore of Base Ventures, encouraged the entrepreneur to relocate Pigeonly from Hutson's post-prison stint home of Tampa back to the scene of his crime in order to be around like-minded tech founders. While Hutson says many wondered if he could be trusted, a few believed.

"I got a lot of, 'I can't get my mind around the fact that I'd be investing in a felon.' But in the end, others saw that I may be the best person to help this population," he says. "As is true in business, showing people numbers is what did the trick."

Specifically, Hutson showed how a direct mail campaign — letters are the only way to communicate with inmates — touting Pigeonly's Fotopigeon service (50 cents per print) got an unusually high response rate of 25%. Since launching in early 2013, he's grown that business from 1,000 to 10,000 photos a week.

Pigeonly's latest venture, the Telepigeon phone service, kicked off last December. It works by generating a phone number that is local to the incarcerated family member, who is then informed of the number by mail.

When it is dialed, the call is automatically transferred to the phone of a family member regardless of their location, reducing the cost of each call from 23 cents to the 6-cent local call rate.

With just 11 employees, Pigeonly has far from taken wing. But Hutson isn't likely to let this legitimate golden opportunity fly away. The way he sees it, millions are counting on him.

"I've helped kids talk to their dads and moms and saved real people real money in the past year, and that's humbling and motivating," says Hutson, flashing a disarming and ever-present smile.

Asked if he is a role model, Hutson shrugs.

"Not for what I did before, which was stupid and hurt my mom and my family. But I enjoy being an example now," he says.

"In the black and brown community, people don't knock on certain doors because they think they shouldn't. We usually don't have uncles who majored in computer science, so we start barbershops and mobile car washes, which are fine. But I'm here to say, you can knock on this door, too."

]]>
7609 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
The forces that lie behind the Silicon Valley workforce numbers http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/the-forces-that-lie-behind-the-silicon-valley-workforce-numbers/ Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:15:34 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7617

After years of resisting, a handful of Silicon Valley's biggest companies have in recent weeks provided detailed demographic breakdowns of their workforces -- confirming what we already knew but raising questions about what the tech industry needs to do to fix its diversity problem.

The release of the data, while long overdue, has been a welcome act of transparency on the part of the companies and is spurring a needed conversation about the types of people who work at tech companies. (As an aside, I've been pushing for more disclosure, and this newspaper is asking other large firms in the valley for their data. I will be reporting to you in a couple of weeks on how those companies have responded.)

What have we learned? Well, to no one's surprise, valley firms are mostly white and male. Specifically, tech workers are roughly 70 percent male and more than 60 percent white, 30 percent Asian, 2 percent African-American, and 3 percent Hispanic. (eBay, which released its data last week, stood out for having considerably more women on staff (42 percent) and more blacks (7 percent) than the average Silicon Valley firm.) Other firms that have disclosed their data include Google, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.

That raises a second question: Do the similar profiles at each firm mean that no one company is actively discriminating against a certain group?

Yes, say diversity experts. There's also something to the notion that Silicon Valley is actually one big company with a Google division, a Facebook division, the startup department and so on. That may contribute to the similar workforce demographics.

What appears to be at work here is more subtle, but just as damaging as straightforward bias.

"People move frequently between companies, and attitudes, bias, etc., transfer easily," said Tracy Chou, a software engineer at Pinterest who has been a leading voice in the effort to push tech firms to disclose their demographics.

If overt discrimination isn't happening, is the problem in the talent pipeline? In other words, are companies hiring the workers they do because those are the workers trained for those jobs?

I bristle at criticism of the pipeline because it tends to focus on the individual side of the equation (if only more Latinas took calculus).

There is another side of the equation, though. While companies don't have a direct role in the education system, they do bear responsibility for hiring and promoting decisions.

And what often happens, diversity experts say, is what's called "mirroring" -- companies started by white men tend to hire and promote people who look and act like themselves -- meaning more white men.

Cultural perceptions of course play a role. For example, Asians at most of the tech companies are not proportionally represented in leadership roles. At Google, where 30 percent of the U.S. workforce is Asian, they make up just 23 percent of the leadership. Thirty-four percent of Facebook's U.S. employees are Asian but Asians hold just 19 percent of the senior level positions. Some call this "the bamboo ceiling."

"Asian-Americans, in the U.S. at least, are not often seen as leadership material," said Michael Chang, a board member on the Santa Clara County Board of Education and department chair at the Asian Pacific American Leadership Institute at De Anza College. "In one culture, strength may be very extroverted and very assertive. In another culture, strength may be very quiet and determined."

The bias can begin even at the job referral stage.

A company "may be doing the recruiting through references and you are going to get a lot of the same thing," said Elizabeth Ames, vice president of strategic marketing and alliances at the Anita Borg Institute.

Some companies have tried to combat some of that bias by having recruiters look at résumés blind, without indicators of race and gender, she said. Other companies such as Google have held "unconscious bias" training for their employees.

Tech companies, which say they are data-driven organizations, should apply that mindset to these questions, said Freada Kapor Klein, co-chair of the Kapor Center.

"Diversity has not been a serious concern of the leadership of any of these companies," she said. "It was a 'nice to have,' not a 'need to have.'

"Just think if they bring more resources and mine the data of everything, how they recruit, interview, assign and promote," she said.

I am not certain what's the best approach. But to their credit most of the companies in the valley recognize they have a problem, and have indicated they're taking steps to fix it.

It's far past time for the valley to do more to live up to the vision of itself as a meritocracy, not a "mirrortocracy."

Contact Michelle Quinn at 510-394-4196 and mquinn@mercurynews.com. Follow her attwitter.com/michellequinn.

]]>
7617 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Oakland looking more and more like the new SoMa for tech leasing http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/oakland-looking-more-and-more-like-the-new-soma-for-tech-leasing/ Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:55:17 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7619 Bill Cumbelich, a broker with CBRE. Cumbelich mostly concentrated on San Francisco, but is now handling leasing for Oakland office buildings. In the past, price was the primary reason to defect from San Francisco to the East Bay, but the scenario has changed. Oakland now boasts many of the urban amenities that draw tech tenants to San Francisco: proximity to BART and other public transportation, restaurants and nightlife. On top of that, housing is more affordable. “We see this real estate cycle as a different scenario,” Cumbelich said. “It will be easier to attract and retain employees in Oakland. We think Oakland could be another submarket of San Francisco.” Cumbelich isn’t the only person who sees Oakland as the SoMa of the future. Mitch Kapor, an early tech founder and philanthropist, moved his foundation and investment fund to Oakland two years ago and also made the Oakland-SoMa comparison. What made SoMa what it is now is that it started out as gritty and underutilized and was transformed into an edgy office market that attracted companies to break the norm. Already, the migration trend of tenants going west to east is taking hold, said Trevor Thorpe, who manages CBRE’s East Bay operations. The wave started with non-profits, grew to professional services like law and engineering firms. Tech, he said, is next. The same pattern happened when SoMa went through revitalization as tenants were priced out of other parts of San Francisco. In the past three years, average asking rents in San Francisco shot up by 90 percent to $59 per square foot in 2013 from $31 per square foot in 2010. In Oakland, rents have climbed by 15 percent during the same period from $24 per square foot in 2010 to $28 per square foot in 2014 — half of the San Francisco average. Besides rents soaring, San Francisco is the middle of a space crunch despite more than 4 million square feet of office space under construction since much of the new space is pre-leased. In a few years, development activity could hit a voter-approved cap on office development known as Prop. M that would stall prospective projects. Oakland's has cheaper rents along with more available space will work in Oakland’s favor. The vacancy in San Francisco is 7 percent vs. 14.2 percent in Oakland. "We believe that the recent commercial real estate renaissance in the Oakland market is supporting a more broad-based and sticky (i.e. permanent) economic recovery and transference of users to the East Bay,” Thorpe said. So far, the spillover effect from San Francisco to the East Bay counts more than 300,000 square feet of leasing. The East Bay has yet to land a marquis expansion or headquarters in this cycle, but that could happen once more creative space opens up in repositioned properties like the Sears department store that was recently bought by Lane Partners. Lane has plans to revamp the building as Uptown Station. Lane Partners is planning an extensive renovation of the 400,000-square-foot property that should be done by 2016. The work hasn’t even started and already a tech tenant with a requirement for 150,000 square feet has toured the building, Cumbelich said. “The building is being designed for tech,” he said. “We can land a big tenant in the next 12 months.”
Blanca Torres covers East Bay real estate for the San Francisco Business Times.
]]>
7619 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Apple diversity report: 'Making progress,' but a long way to go http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/apple-diversity-report-making-progress-but-a-long-way-to-go/ Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:41:30 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7647 7647 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> It Takes a Tech Vilage: How Kapor Center Funds the Future http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/it-takes-a-tech-vilage-how-kapor-center-funds-the-future/ Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:21:50 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7665 At the 2014 ESSENCE Festival, we hosted our first-ever #YESWECODE Tech Village, an all-day event featuring community leaders, thinkers and technical training and mentoring organizations working to fill the minority gap in Silicon Valley and beyond. In our 'It Takes a Tech Village' series, we profile the organizations that made the Tech Village a success.

Organizations like Hack the Hood and Qeyno Labs are working to disrupt the current makeup of the technology and innovation workforce (which is overwhelmingly white and male) by giving students hands-on training in coding, design and other essential tech skills. Then there are other organizations in the Bay Area, like the Kapor Center, who help to fund and support these organizations' missions.

"As a funder," said Cedrick Brown, a managing partner at the Kapor Center, "we play a different role. We convene organizations and bring them together to talk about best practices for building a movement."

We spoke to Brown about the unique position of his organization and how it provides broad support to a number of tech preparatory organizations in the area. ESSENCE: What goals are central to the Kapor Center’s mission? Cedrick Brown: The Kapor Center was initially the Kapor Foundation- - we've done grant making for the past number of years, mostly in the San Francisco Bay Area. Recently, we've pivoted and started to focus on technology. We want to look at how technology has an impact on communities across the board. Specifically, we want to have people of color from low-income communities participate in the technology economy. What’s most unique about the Kapor Center’s work? CB: Where other organizations work with students, we get to work directly with the organizations. We come to this work as a funder and a convener, so we actually support a number of the organizations in the area. In fact, we sent four organizations to the Hackathon at ESSENCE Festival, and we've also been advising YESWECODE. We get to be cheerleaders and evangelizers for everyone’s work. We also define the tech pipeline very broadly. In addition to supporting youth coding programs, we have a fellowship program that works to place undergrads in the workforce. We have a program for pre-MBA students to place them in our venture capital arm. We help companies like Google with their diversification strategy. We participate in multiple parts of the tech pipeline. ESSENCE: In regard to diverse representation in Silicon Valley, are we making any real progress? CB: I think we've hit a crucial turning point. Earlier this year, Google released diversity data related to the makeup of their workforce. The fact that Google, an industry leader, did that, allowed for a domino effect. So now we see other companies releasing their data as well. What that says is "We are not proud of this. We are going to make some inroads about changing the makeup of our workforce. We are accepting strategy suggestions on what we can do to be more inclusive." We're starting to move forward with some real intention. This is proof of a shift. There's more work to be done, but that they've come out with the data is really exciting. The other component about this is that YESWECODE has really lifted this conversation to a national level. That both of these things are happening means we're moving in a positive direction. ESSENCE: Is there a student or someone who has come through the Kapor Center whose story is memorable? CB: Whenever we have sponsored or worked with an organization like Qeyno, that puts on these Hackathons, we've seen tremendous, wonderful and compelling ideas come out of them. These youth say "We have ideas that aren't about food and finding a cab, but that are about helping us have broader life trajectories that will have an impact on the quality of life for us and our families." They've come up with online mentoring apps, safe ride home apps and others. I think about the collective energy these students have when given the opportunity and the guidance they need, and it's inspiring. ESSENCE: What's in the pipeline for the Kapor Center? CB: Well, it is indeed about the pipeline. We're putting together a framework from A-Z about how do you get a young person of color through the education pipeline to become a tech manager, a entrepreneur, or a tech venture capitalist. How do we make sure we don't lose students of color to some of the gaps in the pipeline where we seen folks fall out or off of it. We're also working on a big tent event with Google around addressing diversity in the workforce.

]]>
7665 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Creating a Spreadsheet for Giving Back http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/creating-a-spreadsheet-for-giving-back/ Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:38:46 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7668 When Mitchell Kapor was 15, he attended a summer science program that changed his life. The program offered hands-on access to computers, which was rare in the 1960s. The experience set the ball rolling for one of the major success stories in information technology. In the 1980s Mr. Kapor founded Lotus Development Corporation, where he designed Lotus 1-2-3, a spreadsheet program that opened the door to personal computing in business. At Lotus he also first met Freada Klein, whom he would marry many years later. Today, as partners in Kapor Capital, based in Oakland, Calif., Mr. Kapor and Ms. Kapor Klein now devote much of their time to investing in startup companies that promote social change. Among other projects, Ms. Kapor Klein runs the nonprofit Level Playing Field Institute, which promotes fairness in higher education and workplaces. Their work together represents a synthesis of ideas and experience, and is built on a network of friends and businesses. Much of that network has developed on the Vineyard, where they vacation every summer.
Mitch Kapor said he wants to give children the same opportunities he had as a kid. — Mark Lovewell
Vacations are usually a mix of work, socializing and relaxation, they said in an interview over coffee in Edgartown this week. “At sunset we’ll be walking on the beach, but I don’t think we are going to be otherwise goofing off that much,” Mr. Kapor said. This year is their 18th summer on the Vineyard. A few years after stepping down from Lotus in 1986, Mr. Kapor founded the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group, and began investing in technology startups. Ms. Kapor Klein had also left Lotus and was working as a consultant on workplace issues for large corporations. Their paths finally crossed again in the 1990s, and they married in 1999. By 2001, Ms. Kapor Klein was focusing more and more on issues of diversity, and the two former colleagues began to see the potential for combining their talents to make a serious difference in the world. Mr. Kapor was “profoundly influenced” by his wife’s nonprofit advocacy work, he said, and he came to see his own experience in business as a platform for social change. “As I met the kids in the scholarship programs and education programs that Freada started, I understood that what they really needed was the same kind of opportunities that I had as a kid — to show what they could do.” Technology still provides the foundation for their work. “Everything we work on is at the intersection of tech and social justice,” Ms. Kapor Klein said. “Some is in the nonprofit side and some is in the for-profit side. And it’s all about fairness and access and closing gaps — gaps of opportunity and gaps of outcome.” Their investments focus on underprivileged communities, especially communities of color. One example of a startup that is closing the gaps is Lendup, a payday lending company. Unlike most payday (cash advance) lenders, which charge enormous interest rates, Lendup lowers its rate each time a loan is repaid, and helps people build a credit score. Impact investment, as it’s called, is starting to catch on among foundations, universities and philanthropists, Mr. Kapor said. Kapor Capital is at the forefront of the movement. “I’d say we are still in the middle of the experiment, because it takes seven to 10 years really to get a full set of results,” he said. He hopes the company will inspire imitation. The country’s steady decline in global education rankings forms the underpinning for the focus on technology. Ms. Kapor Klein said that by 2020 in the U.S. there will be one million unfilled technology-related jobs. “We don’t train enough, we don’t encourage enough kids to pursue computer science,” she said. She worried that the Googles, Facebooks and Twitters of tomorrow may be created elsewhere.
Freada Kapor Klein founded the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit digital rights group. — Mark Lovewell
Their work is not just about doing what they believe is right, she said. “It’s an economic imperative for the country.” Benjamin Jealous, former president of the NAACP and a Vineyard visitor, became a senior partner in Kapor Capital this year. Ms. Kapor Klein said focusing on market-based solutions can give an edge over nonprofits, which often pursue the same goals but through legislative solutions. Part of the challenge, she said, is determining where for-profit dynamics are more effective, and where nonprofits still have the advantage. “When do people want to change laws, but when can we just work around them?” she said. “When do we not need to use a legislative strategy?” The Kapors’ partnership with Benjamin Jealous is one example of the value of networking across sectors. As the nation’s largest civil rights organization, the NAACP shares many of the same goals as Kapor Capital. During his five years as head of the NAACP, Mr. Jealous worked on critical issues such as payday lending practices and reforming the criminal justice system. “He completely transformed the organization,” Ms. Kapor Klein said. But in some areas, individual companies such as Lendup have been more successful. For several years, the Kapors hosted gatherings at their home in Chilmark, where people could meet Mr. Jealous and learn about the work of the NAACP. When Mr. Jealous stepped down as president in 2013, he was looking for a new challenge and became intrigued by the market-based solutions that Kapor Capital was pursuing. One area of overlap was an effort by the two groups to reduce the cost of phone calls from prison inmates, which can be as high as $4 per minute. Kapor Capital has been investing in Pigeonly, an online company that offers an alternative service at one tenth the cost and helps connect inmates to society. Mr. Kapor suggested that Mr. Jealous join the firm as a venture partner, working one day a week to see if it was a good fit. “He got so engaged with this so quickly, he came back to us and made a counter proposal and said, ‘I want to do this full time,’” Mr. Kapor said.
The couple's dog, Dudley. — Mark Lovewell
When Mr. Jealous became a senior partner in Kapor Capital this year, he brought with him not only his expertise in social advocacy, but a wide range of government and business connections. Many similar connections have been fostered on the Vineyard. This year, for example, the Kapors hosted an event for John Wilson, former director of the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities and president of Morehouse College. Last year the Kapors organized a tour of Silicon Valley for Mr. Wilson, as part of a larger effort to create pathways from Morehouse, a historically black college, to jobs in the tech industry. Mr. Wilson was a classmate at Morehouse with filmmaker Spike Lee, who hosted the event this summer at his home in Oak Bluffs. Ms. Kapor Klein said the biggest obstacle to impact investment is the deeply ingrained biases that in part shape the business world. She noted the growing concern that the demographics within large technology companies do not represent the United States as a whole. She also cited research in neuroscience that reveals the hidden biases in how we make decisions. “We are more biased than we wish,” she said. “Business can no longer be disconnected from the impacts that it’s having, whether it’s on the environment or people or unemployment,” she said. She said she believes awareness among businesses is growing, “but I think there is a lot of resistance.” The long-term goal, said Mr. Kapor, is “to save capitalism from itself . . . from its own worst tendencies and excesses in promoting inequality . . . to have business more aligned with social goals and democratic values.” He doubted whether those goals were reachable, but he hopes to at least “nudge things in that direction.” Ms. Kapor Klein joked that one long-term goal is retirement. “It’s why we are delighted that somebody like Ben Jealous, who is 41, is jumping in,” she said. She added that the company also employs people in their 20s and 30s. “So it’s really about turning over what we’ve learned and what we’ve done to the next generations.”
- See more at: http://mvgazette.com/news/2014/08/28/creating-spreadsheet-giving-back?k=vg540df38cb750c&r=1#sthash.GvBjdy2G.dpuf]]>
7668 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Quinn: Fixing Silicon Valley's diversity problem http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/quinn-fixing-silicon-valleys-diversity-problem/ Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:44:39 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7671 For advocates of a more diverse tech workforce, the past few months couldn't have gone much better.

After years of resisting, many tech companies disclosed the demographic makeup of their workers. And they didn't try to gloss over the fact that most don't employ nearly enough women, African-Americans and Latinos. Instead, they said they should do better.

So now what?

I don't have all the answers. And it's not just up to the companies; they can't hire more women or minorities until the educational system starts training more.

It's also not simply a matter of hiring more diversely. There is also the issue of what happens once women and ethnic and racial minorities are working inside firms. Do they take on leadership roles or stall? Do they leave companies and the industry more frequently than white men -- the so-called "leaky pipeline" problem?

But what can Silicon Valley firms do in the short term to achieve their goals of having a more diverse workforce?

Here are some suggested steps, based on my reporting about this issue:

First, tech firms should commit to disclosing workforce data annually.

Posting this data doesn't change anything, of course, but it keeps a spotlight on the issue.

"If chief executives are regularly reporting the diversity data, they will start asking their folks how to make these changes," said Telle Whitney, chief executive and president of the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology.

Second, tech companies need to rethink everything about recruiting and assessing someone's talent.

Some are also looking at a wider range of universities and trade groups to recruit from.I've already written how some firms have recruiters look at resumes blind, without indicators of race and gender.

Or, they are trying to reach students at the beginning of their university careers. Piazza Technologies, which makes software for students to communicate with professors, is giving companies a way to contact female students taking computer science classes.

"A lot of companies were started by people who were at universities, so their network is tied to that," said Liliana Monge, co-founder of Sabio, which trains women, African-Americans and Latinos to code. "It's easy to go to a college campus and interview 100 people. You need to find new ways of identifying new talent."

Companies should also broaden the kinds of degrees they consider, say workforce experts, and even the kinds of experience they look for.

At Google, the percentage of hires who don't have college experience has grown over time, Laszlo Bock, Google's head of hiring, told The New York Times. A person's success at Google has more to do with an ability to learn on the fly and solve problems than high grade-point averages and test scores, he said.

Third, and this is hard, companies should start an internal conversation about the firm's culture, from the posters on the walls to what dressing for success means.

For minority job applicants and minority employees, "every step along the way can be fraught," said Freada Kapor Klein, co-chair of the Kapor Center for Social Impact. "Make it safe to have people say what's welcoming and unwelcoming."

Addressing some of these cultural biases is key for retention, said Laura Sherbin, executive vice president and head of research at the Center for Talent Innovation, a research organization that tracks how women are doing in many industries.

For women, "there is an enormous amount of flight risk in the tech industry," she said. One solution is for firms to make a concerted effort to value listening to diverse ideas. Women "are finding other sectors that are friendlier to work for, where they listen to their ideas, value their contributions and make it worthwhile to leave their children every day and come to work."

Finally, share "best practices."

Easy enough for me to say. Companies risk giving away trade secrets that could help competitors recruit and retain talent.

But there are some simple steps that can lead to big payoffs. At Google, employees can nominate themselves for promotions, and what the company found is that men in technical areas "self-nominated" more than technical women, although women who self-nominated tended to get the promotion more often than the men who did so.

Google's solution: an email to everybody encouraging them to raise their hand for a promotion. And when it disclosed its demographic information this year, it reported closing the gap between promotions for technical women and men.

A small change, but profound.

Contact Michelle Quinn at 510-394-4196 and mquinn@mercurynews.com. Follow her attwitter.com/michellequinn.

]]>
7671 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Oakland gains ground in emerging tech industry http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/oakland-gains-ground-in-emerging-tech-industry/ Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:30:42 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7677 By Nate Gartrell For the Oakland Tribune

OAKLAND -- Evidence of the city's emerging influence in the East Bay's technology landscape was on display Tuesday evening at a ceremony celebrating the new headquarters for an organization whose aim is to encourage more minorities to participate in the tech revolution.

The Kapor Center for Social Impact, a foundation that partners with local businesses to leverage technology in the pursuit of positive social change, is setting up a permanent home in Oakland.

The groundbreaking event Tuesday marks the start of remodeling of a three-story downtown building that will serve not only as home to the Kapor Center, but to some of the nonprofits they partner with as well.

"We're not just going to be here physically, but we're going to be an active part of the community, and this building is going to be a part of that," said Mitchell Kapor, the center's multi-millionaire founder who also launched Lotus Development Corporation and has invested in many tech startups.

The Kapor Center partners with local businesses and nonprofits with the objective of "leveling the playing field" for minorities and other underrepresented groups, said Derek Turner, communications director for the center.

Kapor said Tuesday that he prefers Oakland to Silicon Valley, and sees potential in the city to establish its own foothold by attracting other tech companies.

"We're proud to make an investment in Oakland and its future," he said. "I think if we go forward 10 years, we're going to look back and see how Oakland has become a big part of not only the tech ecosystem in the Bay Area, but for the nation as a whole."

The building chosen for the venture by Kapor and his wife, at 2148 Broadway, is identifiable by a large aerosol art mural depicting the phrase "Rise & Grind," along with an elephant sporting an A's cap. The building itself has been vacant for more than a decade, though, and Kapor's wife, Freada Kapor Klein, said it was the only building the center ever looked at.

One of the keynote speakers Tuesday, former NAACP President Benjamin Jealous, said foundations like the Kapor Center are important because a lot of tech companies are known to not "hire people who look like us."

"When you look across that bridge (into San Francisco), you know that on the other side of that bridge, there are not one but typically 10 startups trying to solve the problems of the rich," Jealous said. "We aim to make sure that Oakland becomes the place that is the center of solving the problems for the rest of us."

The Kapor Center has been leasing an office in downtown Oakland, but its establishment here is significant. It exemplifies a shift in Oakland's demographics, but also gives a tip of the cap to the impoverished communities that often aren't given a voice.

The city has been able to attract businesses from the multi-billion dollar tech industry in recent years, and has brought in millions of dollars to redevelop its waterfront, but there are still hundreds of thousands of people in the area living in poverty, and the public school system remains underfunded.

Mayor Jean Quan said that is precisely why it is important for Oakland youth to be given an opportunity to get into the tech industry.

"Fifty years ago, on the march in Washington, (Martin Luther King Jr.) talked about islands of poverty in oceans of prosperity," she said. "I think what the Kapors are doing here is making sure that we have a full onslaught on the remaining islands of poverty, and that the dream really becomes the dream for every child, that's reachable and touchable."

]]>
7677 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Kapor Center establishes Oakland as the epicenter of tech for social justice http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/kapor-center-establishes-oakland-as-the-epicenter-of-tech-for-social-justice/ Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:18:51 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7683 The Kapor Center, which invests in both for-profit and nonprofit tech ventures, celebrated the groundbreaking of their new headquarters on Tuesday, promising to constitute the (aptly metaphorical) heart of Oakland’s tech-for-social-justice world. As one of the Kapor partners, Benjamin Jealous, put it, “We’re here to make sure that as Oakland becomes more tech, tech becomes more Oakland.” The Center will occupy a building on 22nd and Broadway that has been vacant for a decade. After a serious remodeling, it will become a three-story complex that is decidedly public-facing for a philanthropic and venture capital firm. There will be an event auditorium in the basement, a rooftop garden and a street-level cafe. “We’re here to make an investment in Oakland,” said Freada Kapor Klein, “We’re here to strengthen the tech ecosystem and open our doors to anyone that wants to be a part of that.” The public-access features of the building will commingle with Kapor Capital, a seed stage investor; the Kapor Center for Social Impact, a nonprofit with the express mission of leveraging tech to attack social and economic injustice; and, lastly, the Level Playing Field Institute, which is a pipeline program that facilitates the movement of resource-strapped youth into careers in tech. “You know that on the other side of that bridge, there are startups trying to solve the problems of the rich,” Jealous said. “We aim to make sure that Oakland becomes the place that is the center of solving the problems for the rest of us.” The Kapor Center does this by partnering with mission aligned nonprofits like The Marcus Foster Education Fund, the College Access Foundation of California, and, full disclosure: Oakland Local. On the investment side, some Kapor-funded startups are expressly philanthropic or democratizing, others are simply good business ideas that might not be as lucrative as big-buck ventures.  Mayor Jean Quan has arguably had more success attracting this kind of social enterprise to Oakland than she has in reforming the civic institutions they supplement. “Fifty years ago, on the march in Washington, [Martin Luther King, Jr.] talked about islands of poverty in oceans of prosperity,” Mayor Quan said. “I think what the Kapors are doing here is making sure that we have a full onslaught on the remaining islands of poverty, and that the dream really becomes the dream for every child, that’s reachable and touchable.” The gold rush dream of tech prosperity is certainly coming closer into reach from across the Bay. But it sounds like the Kapor Center is less concerned with the dream and more concerned with making life livable even for the non-prosperous. That way we don’t have to dream. If tech can direct itself towards those aims, then maybe we won’t feel disturbed when see our home advertised as “the new tech area” on Craigslist.]]> 7683 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Drummond: Kapor Center for Social Impact tackles tech divide in Oakland http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/drummond-kapor-center-for-social-impact-tackles-tech-divide-in-oakland/ Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:02:40 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7687

By Tammerlin Drummond Oakland Tribune Columnist

Frederick Hutson was in prison on a drug charge when he came up with a novel idea. A low-cost telephone service that would enable prison inmates to dial loved ones -- even in another state -- using a local telephone number. The service would avoid the scandalously exorbitant costs that incarcerated people pay to make phone calls, employing a technology that is similar to Google Voice.

Today, Hutson is CEO of Pigeonly, a Las-Vegas based data company that helps incarcerated people stay connected to their families. With some 2.3 million people currently behind bars often at great distances from their families -- there is a huge untapped market for Pigeonly's "telepigeon" service.
From left, SMASH (summer math and science honors) Founder Mitch Kapor interacts with Breanna Thomas, 15, and other students during pre-calculus class at

From left, SMASH (summer math and science honors) Founder Mitch Kapor interacts with Breanna Thomas, 15, and other students during pre-calculus class at the SMASH Academy, for low-income kids at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif. on Wednesday, July 27, 2011. (LiPo Ching/Mercury News) (LiPo Ching)

This isn't your typical tech startup. Hutson came up with his idea not while attending an elite institution like Stanford or Harvard, but while doing time in a penal institution. There aren't a lot of venture capitalists lining up to give money to African-American ex-cons. Yet Pigeonly is exactly the sort of business that the Oakland-based Kapor Center for Social Impact goes out of its way to add to its investment portfolio. The Kapor Center invested "hundreds of thousands of dollars" -- toward the $1 million in seed funding that Hutson raised. "The telephone is a lifeline and if you break the link you are increasing recidivism, which is the opposite of what we should be doing," says Kapor, co-chair of the Kapor Center, which he cofounded with his wife Freada Kapor Klein. "There have been battles in the FCC for decades to lower the cost, but in this way actually providing an alternative is a more effective way than trying to regulate price caps."
Mitch Kapor is a tech icon who first made his name in Silicon Valley in the early days of personal computing. He cofounded Lotus Development Corp. and helped design the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet, which made him a very wealthy man. Over the years, he has been one of Silicon Valley's top angel investors. But Kapor has always been troubled by the ever-widening gap between those who have access to -- and knowledge of how to use information technology -- and those who don't. He looked around Silicon Valley and saw a tech sector where there were almost no minorities or women. He wasn't buying into the libertarian notion that tends to run through the tech community that this glaring absence is due to a lack of talent. Kapor and his wife decided to start the Kapor Center for Social Impact. Its mission is to help close what the Kapors call "gaps" in education, achievement, income, health -- those very real barriers to people from disadvantaged backgrounds to developing the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in the tech field. The Kapor Center recently began renovating a 45,000 square foot building on Broadway in downtown Oakland for its headquarters. When it opens in October 2015, the new headquarters will have a public cafe and auditorium. Kapor says it will serve as a gathering place for the many individuals and organizations in the Bay Area that are using technology to help solve social problems.  

The Kapor center has a two-pronged approach to increasing the numbers of minorities in tech and helping to level the playing field.

Kapor Capital, the venture capital side provides seed-funding to promising entrepreneurs, who like Hutson have good ideas but don't have traditional resumes. Though Kapor emphasizes they must have a prototype in hand. In addition to providing funding, the Kapors mentor entrepreneurs and provide invaluable feedback as they go from prototype to launch and beyond.

The nonprofit arm focuses on programs to prepare underrepresented youth for STEM careers.

SMASH (summer math and science honors), a five-week summer program, brings high achieving minority students to UC Berkeley, UCLA, Stanford and USC for three summers straight. The students get intensive training in STEM courses and also get exposure to professionals working at tech companies such as Google and Facebook. Another program, the College Bound Brotherhood, helps prepare African-American male high school students in Antioch, Oakland, Richmond and San Francisco for college -- both academically and emotionally. "We're trying to find those interventions that make the most difference and then figure out how you scale them," Kapor said.

Tammerlin Drummond is a columnist for the Bay Area News Group. Her column runs Thursday and Sunday. Contact her at tdrummond@bayareanewsgroup.com or follow her atTwitter.com/tammerlin.

]]>
7687 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Exposing Hidden Bias at Google http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/exposing-hidden-bias-at-google/ Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:44:13 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7778 Google, like many tech companies, is a man’s world.

Started by a pair of men, its executive team is overwhelmingly male, and its work force is dominated by men. Over all, seven out of 10 people who work at Google are male.

Men make up 83 percent of Google’s engineering employees and 79 percent of its managers. In a report to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last year, Google said that of its 36 executives and top-ranking managers, just three are women.

Google’s leaders say they are unhappy about the firm’s poor gender diversity, and about the severe underrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics among its work force.

And so they are undertaking a long-term effort to improve these numbers, the centerpiece of which is a series of workshops aimed at making Google’s culture more accepting of diversity.

There’s just one problem: The company has no solid evidence that the workshops, or many of its other efforts to improve diversity, are actually working.

Google is attacking the problem with its considerable resources and creativity. But it does not have a timeline for when the company’s work force might become representative of the population, or whether it will ever get there.

“I think it’s terrific that they’re doing this,” said Freada Kapor Klein, an entrepreneur who has long studied workplace diversity, and who is the co-chairwoman of the Kapor Center for Social Impact. “But it’s going to be important that Google not just give a lecture about the science, but that there be active strategies on how to mitigate bias. A one-shot intervention against a lifetime of biased messages is unlikely to be successful.”

Google says its plan isn’t one-shot. It points out that it has been trying to improve its diversity for years by sponsoring programs to increase the number of women and minorities who go into tech, and meticulously studying the way it hires people in an effort to reduce bias.

In May after pressure from civil rights leaders, the company published a report documenting the sex and race of its employees “to be candid about the issues,” Laszlo Bock, Google’s executive in charge of human resources, wrote at the time.

Google’s disclosure prompted a wave of similar reports across the industry, with Facebook, Apple, Yahoo and other tech giants issuing similarly dismal numbers about their work forces.

Google’s diversity training workshops, which began last year and which more than half of Google’s nearly 49,000 employees have attended, are based on an emerging field of research in social psychology known as unconscious bias. These are the hidden, reflexive preferences that shape most people’s worldviews, and that can profoundly affect how welcoming and open a workplace is to different people and ideas.

Google’s interest in hidden biases was sparked in 2012, when Mr. Bock read an article in The New York Times about a study that showed systematic discrimination against female applicants for scientific jobs in academia. The effect was so pervasive that researchers theorized the discrimination must be governed by unconscious cultural biases rather than overt sexism.

Mr. Bock wondered how such unconscious biases were playing out at Google. “This is a pretty genteel environment, and you don’t usually see outright manifestations of bias,” he said. “Occasionally you’ll have some idiot do something stupid and hurtful, and I like to fire those people.”

But Mr. Bock suspected that the more pernicious bias was most likely pervasive and hidden, a deep-set part of the culture rather than the work of a few loudmouth sexists.

Improving diversity wasn’t just a feel-good goal for Google. Citing research that shows diverse teams can be more creative than homogeneous ones, Mr. Bock argued that a diverse work force could be good for Google’s business. Could Google investigate how biases were affecting people’s work — and, more important, could it change its own culture?

The lecture begins with a dismal fact: Everyone is a little bit racist or sexist. If you think you’re immune, take the Implicit Association Test, which empirically measures people’s biases. Dr. Welle goes on to explain that some of the most damaging bias is unconscious; people do the worst stuff without meaning to, or even recognizing that they’re being influenced by their preferences.

The effect of bias is powerful, and it isn’t softened by Silicon Valley’s supposedly meritocratic culture. In the lecture, Dr. Welle shows a computer simulation of how a systematic 1 percent bias against women in performance evaluation scores can trickle up through the ranks, leading to a severe underrepresentation of women in management.

Finally, Dr. Welle points to research showing that we aren’t slaves to our hidden biases. The more we make ourselves aware of the role our unconscious plays in our decision-making, and the more we try to force others to confront their biases, the greater the chance we have of overcoming our hidden preferences.

Google offered several anecdotes that seem to indicate a less biased culture as a result of the training. Not long ago the company opened a new building, and someone spotted the fact that all the conference rooms were named after male scientists; in the past, that might have gone unmentioned, but this time the names were changed.

During one recent promotion meeting in which a group of male managers were deciding the fate of a female engineer, a senior manager who had been through the bias training cautioned his colleagues to remember that they were all men — and thus might not be able to fully appreciate the different roles women perform in engineering groups. “Just raising the awareness was enough for people to think about it,” Mr. Bock said. The woman was promoted.

Another time, in an all-company presentation, an interviewer asked a male and female manager who had recently begun sharing an office, “Which one of you does the dishes?” The strange, sexist undertone of the question was immediately seized upon by a senior executive in the crowd, who yelled, “Unconscious bias!”

Mr. Bock saw all of these actions as evidence that the training was working. “Suddenly you go from being completely oblivious to going, ‘Oh my god, it’s everywhere,’ ” he said.

But whether that will lead to a long-term change at Google and, in turn, the rest of the tech industry, remains an open question.

]]>
7778 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Thank You Freada Kapor Klein for Making Me Feel Uncomfortable http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/thank-you-freada-kapor-klein-for-making-me-feel-uncomfortable/ Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:51:17 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7781 Kapor Center for Social Impact and an advocate for diversity and inclusion, to meet up and explore ways we might collaborate. Here at Techbridge we inspire girls to change the world through science, technology, and engineering. We do this with after-school and summer programs in Oakland, San Jose, and Seattle. The programs create a network of peers and adults that engages girls in science, technology, and engineering through critical transition points when identities are shaped and academic and career goals are refined. At Techbridge we feel strongly that every girl should have the opportunity to aspire to be a computer programmer or chemical engineer. When our girls share their dreams of following in the footsteps of a role model they meet in Techbridge, we are mindful of what it will take to get them there. For girls with weak math skills or limited understanding of academic prerequisites for a technical career, we know that additional support will be needed for those dreams to become a reality. We can't do it all and look for partners who can support our girls. Programs supported by the Level Playing Field Institute that Freada created can provide the resources that can help our girls get from here to their futures. While I expected that the conversation with Freada would follow the typical agenda for meetings, the encounter took an expected detour. After brief introductions, Freada jumped online and onto the Techbridge website. She went to our staff page and scrolled down through our staff biographies and photos. Freada was direct and got straight to the point, noting that our staff didn't reflect the diversity of the girls we serve. Freada made me uncomfortable and that's what I needed to feel. I moved diversity from a backburner issue to a priority for Techbridge. Shortly after the meeting, I had the chance to take action on Freada's challenge. With the expansion of our after-school programs to new cities, we were hiring new staff. This was the opportunity to do things differently. First, we looked on the websites of other groups to see how they messaged their commitment to diversity in hiring. We reviewed and reset our priorities for recruitment. We recognized the importance for new hires to reflect the diversity of our girls and to bring experience working with diverse communities. Their diversity improves all that we do at Techbridge from developing new curriculum, to supporting role models, to training partners. We have made progress since the challenge from Freada. And, we have room to grow. We are now looking with an eye to diversity as we build out our national board and advisory councils. As we recruit for these positions, we are mindful of going beyond our usual channels and networks of colleagues and friends. The fields of science, technology, and engineering are mostly white and mostly male, but we don't want to reflect those demographics in our staff and leadership. Techbridge is a work in progress in its diversity. Pressing tasks like working with the board or fundraising often take immediate attention. As CEO and Executive Director, I need to keep diversity a priority as well. With a diverse team, Techbridge will be better able to achieve our mission. One program coordinator leading tech activities can influence a roomful of girls to persist in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). One role model of color can inspire our girls to know that a future in a technical field is within reach. This is particularly so for girls of color who perceive greater racial barriers than gender barriers in their pathways in STEM. Freada made me confront my shortcomings as a leader in promoting diversity within Techbridge. I challenge you to look within your organization and consider your recruiting, hiring, and retention practices. Recently, tech companies including Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn have taken a first step to think about diversity by sharing their numbers. We at nonprofits can do the same. How are you doing? Does your staff reflect the demographics of your community and the groups you serve? I invite you to share on your successes, challenges, and goals for promoting diversity in your organization. Techbridge is a nonprofit based in Oakland, California that inspires girls to discover a passion for technology, science, and engineering. Through, girl-tested science, technology, and engineering activities and leadership development we empower the next generation of innovators and leaders. With 15 years of experience, Techbridge provides training and resources for role models, teachers, families, school districts, and corporate partners to encourage and support girls and youth from underserved populations in science, technology, and engineering. This summer, Techbridge opened an office in the Greater Seattle area and is expanding to Washington, DC in 2015.]]> 7781 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> High-tech pay gap: Minorities earn less in skilled jobs http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/high-tech-pay-gap-minorities-earn-less-in-skilled-jobs/ Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:53:39 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7784 Silicon Valley companies say they are taking a close look at issues such as pay equity. "We are regularly looking at our diversity metrics so that we can understand the current situation, target problem areas to address and have a baseline to track the results of change," said Janet Van Huysse, Twitter's vice president of diversity and inclusion. "We are becoming more transparent with our employee data, open in dialogue throughout the company and rigorous in our recruiting, hiring and promotion practices." Historically, researchers have focused on the gender pay gap in Corporate America. "There's this big narrative in the women's movement: 78 cents on the dollar. Everyone knows what that means. It's less talked about when it comes to race," said Laura Weidman Powers, co-founder and CEO of Code2040, a non-profit that nurtures black and Hispanic tech talent. "It's a question of value and seeing value in these populations. And when it comes to hiring and paying people, value translates into dollars," Powers said. Puzzling to researcher Kreisberg is the pay gap for Asians, who are generally well represented in the rank and file — if not the leadership — of technology companies. One of the causes may be rooted in gender and cultural differences: how comfortable people feel negotiating salary, says Klein. White managers may also respond differently to people of color when they negotiate a starting salary or a pay raise, she said. This is something of a paradox for an industry that prides itself on being a meritocracy where anyone with smarts, ambition and hard work can make it, regardless of gender, race, nationality or class. Emilio Castilla, an associate professor of management at the MIT Sloan School of Management, has conducted extensive research on merit-based practices and the culture of meritocracy. His research has found that managers in organizations that promote meritocracy actually show greater bias in favor of men over equally performing women in rewarding merit-based bonuses and promotions. "The lesson is not that companies shouldn't adopt merit-based practices but that the pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it first appears. If not designed and implemented carefully, merit-based practices may trigger bias against women and ethnic minorities," Castilla said. "Perhaps implicit in companies and industries that pride themselves on being meritocratic is the presumption that they are fair and that they provide great workplace opportunities. However, because merit-based practices are ultimately implemented by managers, there are hidden risks." Silicon Valley can take steps to close the pay gap, Castilla said. He recently studied a large private company where he found that women, ethnic minorities and employees not born in the U.S. received lower bonuses than white men with the same performance evaluations, working in the same job and in the same unit for the same manager. Castilla helped the company put in place new organizational procedures to increase accountability and transparency in the performance reward system. "My recent field study illustrates that companies can successfully adopt organizational procedures to achieve and ensure meritocracy for all employees, regardless of their demographics," he said.]]> 7784 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Mogul Seeks to Help Youths in Troubled Areas Embrace Technology http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/mogul-seeks-to-help-youths-in-troubled-areas-embrace-technology/ Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:57:20 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7787 Money and Expertise The $36-million Kapor foundation has contributed the bulk of the center’s support so far, shedding some of its previous giving programs to make room for the new focus. (Casualties include the fund’s longtime programs in civic engagement and fostering a green economy.) Though the foundation will remain a financial entity, all of the programs it supports will now be managed by the center. The Kapor Center supports fewer grantees than the foundation did but gives out roughly the same amount annually, about $4.4-million. (The center’s managing partner, Cedric Brown, says it will spend more in the future.) Kapor Capital bankrolls private companies, like one that makes it more affordable for prison inmates to make phone calls, and others aimed at people with needs that tend to be underserved by companies and governments. The Center for Social Impact seeks not just to help support the 30-some groups that get its grants and investments, Mr. Kapor says, but to offer its own expertise and connections to strengthen the city’s tech infrastructure. Tech companies and colleges haven’t done enough to reach young minorities and encourage them to study in tech fields, he says. "There is a pipeline problem in that we don’t get enough people into it. Plus, the pipeline itself is leaky: We lose too many people once they get them in."

No Applications

Government statistics back him up. Only one in eight American technology workers is black or Hispanic, as are less than 10 percent of those earning science or engineering degrees. In California, those groups account for less than 2 percent of all high-school students who took advanced-placement courses in computer science last year. The center doesn’t accept grant applications, a decision made in part to move the center away from the foundation’s practice of making large operating grants to new groups. The organization, says Mr. Brown, feared that "we were entering risky situations by giving new organizations large sums of money. We’ve changed to reflect our belief in having strong partners who run strong projects." The center has yet to determine how to measure what it does. Mr. Brown says the center doesn’t trust the "numbers-served" metrics that some organizations use to show how far they have reached into neighborhoods. But it hasn’t yet come up with an alternative way to quantify the impact and value of its partnerships. "Our first goal was to get our feet wet," Mr. Brown says. "Now we’re coming to the point where we can narrow our goals down and have some conversations about our collaborations and whether they’re accomplishing enough. We’re not there yet, but we’re close."

‘A Powerful Cocktail’

About half of the roughly $4-million the Kapor Center awards each year goes to the Level Playing Field Institute, an organization Ms. Kapor Klein formed several years ago that works to get minority youths into science and technology education programs. Much of the rest goes to organizations that pop up on the center’s radar. When deciding whether to support a group, Kapor Center officials look at the organization’s web presence and how its leaders communicate its mission, and then they talk to people who are familiar with it. If Kapor leaders see a chance for collaboration, they’ll arrange a meeting with the organization’s chief. "What we look for are groups that do work that could complement ours, that have well-developed networks and thoughtful, positive leadership," says Mr. Brown. "For us, that’s a powerful cocktail." Early on, the center spent money and time helping to connect Oakland’s tech companies, meeting spaces, students, and workers together in one database. That resource, run by a local news operation’s website, went from a handful of listings a year ago to nearly 300 today, Mr. Brown says. "We’ve become the evangelists of sorts for Oakland’s tech sector," he says. "There’s so much energy and potential right now—strong nonprofits, social-justice groups, and tech companies. We’re trying to get all that to coalesce."

Extra Support

The Kapor Center also offers its partners advice, some technological know-how, and some hands-on services, such as helping them put together meetings and tech systems. For example, last fall, when the UNCF, formerly the United Negro College Fund, asked for help putting together a Silicon Valley leadership summit, the Kapor Center not only gave it $25,000 but sent some of its staff members and leaders to help set up the conference and give some seminars of their own. Kapor’s willingness to offer more than cash to groups makes its support more valuable to them, Mr. Brown believes, and reflects a desire of many new foundation donors to find new ways of solving problems. "Philanthropists in high tech are looking to disrupt philanthropy a bit, in a respectful way," he says. "I’m glad we can be part of that." Some grant makers in northern California say that the center's approach makes it stand out. "The center champions an important model of change," says Emmett Carson, president of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, adding that it helps businesses see inclusion and diversity as "key economic drivers of success." Still, others wonder whether the Kapor way of supporting social change is really all that new. Grant makers have always provided both financial and nonfinancial support to charities, notes Michael Edwards, a distinguished senior fellow at Demos, a policy and research think tank. Though he says he isn’t deeply familiar with the Kapor Center’s work, he hears a worrisome echo between its strategy and that of other philanthropy efforts driven by tech entrepreneurs. "The kind of support being offered by the Kapors of this world might come closer to interference, direction, or even control," says Mr. Edwards.

Close Collaboration

Yet some of its grantees say the Kapor Center’s partnership model does represent a welcome departure from traditional grant making. "It’s clear to me that the center has its own ideas of how things should be done," says Alicia Dixon, executive director of the Marcus Foster Education Fund, an Oakland group that provides college scholarships. For instance, says Ms. Dixon, a former program officer at the California Endowment, "there’s no make-the-goal, file-a-report process. We meet with them very frequently." But, she says, the Kapor Center’s hands-on approach isn’t all that intrusive: "There’s so much strategic work that we have to do to penetrate these school districts that that level of collaboration is appropriate." Her experience with Kapor is echoed by Kilimanjaro Robbs, co-founder of the Hidden Genius Project, an Oakland nonprofit that helps C-average black male high-school students prepare to study science or technical subjects in college. The Kapor Center gave the tiny, two-year-old group $30,000 to run a summer project for tech-minded teenagers and then coupled it with Kapor’s summer fellows program. That linkage helped the money go further and the youths learn more than they normally would have, Mr. Robbs says. "They took our guys along with theirs, many of whom are in college, some even seeking advanced degrees," he says. "They took them on tours of tech-company headquarters, the Computer History Museum, and other places that show young people the possibilities of innovation. Just having our students travel with the fellows, who look like them and sometimes come from the same places and who are succeeding in college, was invaluable." Joining one summer program to another serves as an example of what he sees as the Kapor Center’s resourcefulness, he adds, and its desire to help organizations set up programs sets it apart from other grant makers. "I’m not a traditional nonprofit person," says Mr. Robbs, who works as a product]]>
7787 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Apple CEO Tim Cook pushes corporate America toward more open future http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/apple-ceo-tim-cook-pushes-corporate-america-toward-more-open-future/ Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:00:35 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7790 CUPERTINO -- Apple CEO Tim Cook says he is not an activist. But by coming forward as the first publicly gay CEO of a Fortune 500 company, he will have a profound impact on corporate culture and the gay community's place in it, advocates for gay rights say.

Cook discussed his sexuality in an open forum for the first time Thursday in an essay published in Bloomberg Businessweek, announcing that he was "proud to be gay" and becoming by far the most prominent U.S. business leader to come out. The National Football League, the National Basketball Association and the U.S. Senate have all seen their first openly gay representatives in recent years, but the top ranks of corporate America remained a notable holdout. Fearing the consequences for their careers, executives and employees further down the hierarchy often feel they need to keep quiet about their sexuality in the office. But now that the leader of the world's most valuable company has come out, many more employees are likely to feel empowered to do the same, said Selisse Berry, founder and CEO of Out and Equal, a San Francisco nonprofit that advocates for gay rights in the workplace. "It's very powerful to say, 'This is who I am,' and put your energy and your focus on being successful in your career -- not on hiding who you are and looking over your shoulder," she said.Cook, who had long been rumored to be gay, wrote that the choice to open up was difficult. Though he was reluctant to compromise his privacy, he concluded the sacrifice would be worth it if his story comforted others or inspired them to stand up for their rights. "So let me be clear: I'm proud to be gay, and I consider being gay among the greatest gifts God has given me," Cook wrote. Cook's revelation comes amid a broader debate about diversity in Silicon Valley, with calls mounting for tech companies to do more to hire and promote women and minorities. Domestic partner benefits are more common among companies in the valley and the greater Bay Area, Berry said, perhaps in part due to the stiff competition for top talent. But the shortage of openly gay CEOs leading major tech companies suggests the valley could do more, said Freada Kapor Klein, co-chair of the Kapor Center for Social Impact. "The thing with all diversity issues in Silicon Valley is that a lot of decisions are made by people who consider themselves to be open-minded, and yet bias creeps in," she said. "If we were really as bias-free as we aspire to be, then there would be many more openly gay and lesbian CEOs." Experts say dual forces account for the shortage of openly gay CEOs. While fear of hurting business keeps some executives in the closet, lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender employees must also break through a so-called "pink ceiling" as they climb the ranks, advocates say. Companies sometimes steer gay employees away from important meetings due to biases they perceive in their clients, Kapor Klein said. Laws on the books also make it hard for workers to let down their guard -- employees can still be fired based on their sexuality in 29 states. What's more, a report released last year by Deloitte found that 83 percent of LGBT workers mask at least one aspect of their identities at work, perhaps altering their voice or the way they dress. They struggle to do their best work that way, said Sarah Kate Ellis, president and CEO of the gay rights group GLAAD. "Companies are starting to realize that there is a hard dollar cost when people aren't bringing their authentic selves to the office," she said. The global reach of their businesses may also give some Fortune 500 executives pause before they come out, said Tim Bajarin of Creative Strategies. International sales drove 60 percent of Apple's revenue in the fourth quarter. "People don't buy products because of the CEO," he said. "But the CEO of a Fortune 500 company with an international profile has to be at least aware of the fact that in some places where they do business, this is not acceptable." Art Levinson, chairman of Apple's board of directors, stressed that the company stands behind Cook. "Tim has our wholehearted support and admiration in making this courageous personal statement," he said in a statement. "His decision to speak out will help advance the cause of equality and inclusion far beyond the business world." Cook suggested in his essay that he wants to get back to the business of selling gadgets. "I'm an engineer, an uncle, a nature lover, a fitness nut, a son of the South, a sports fanatic, and many other things," he wrote. "I hope that people will respect my desire to focus on the things I'm best suited for and the work that brings me joy." Cook's move drew praise from some of Apple's fiercest competitors. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella posted on Twitter that he was "inspired" by Cook, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg applauded him on their site. "Thank you Tim for showing what it means to be a real, courageous and authentic leader," Zuckerberg wrote. Three years after succeeding Steve Jobs as CEO of Apple, Cook has a track record of advocating for gay rights. Under his leadership, Apple has supported a workplace equality law in California and denounced an Arizona bill that critics warned would permit discrimination against gay people. Cook marched alongside more than 4,000 fellow Apple employees in the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade earlier this year and pushed his home state to do more to support gay rights during his induction to the Alabama Academy of Honor this week. Cook stressed in his letter that his sexual orientation had given him greater empathy and insight into the challenges faced by other minority groups. "It's also given me the skin of a rhinoceros, which comes in handy when you're the CEO of Apple," he said. Vivienne Ming, a 43-year-old transgender woman who lives in Berkeley, found she could relate. The founder of ed tech company Socos, she said she has found it challenging to be open about her identity while doing business in the valley, though she wouldn't choose a different path. "I'm very proud of the things I've done in the business world," she said. "And I know I wouldn't have done them if I hadn't been open about who I am."]]>
7790 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Mitch Kapor challenges high-tech: Create social change http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/mitch-kapor-challenges-high-tech-create-social-change/ Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:04:10 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7793 ]]> 7793 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Guynn: Venture capital is facing up to its diversity problem http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/guynn-venture-capital-is-facing-up-to-its-diversity-problem/ Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:06:52 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7795 Innovating Women: The Changing Face of Technology. Studies consistently show that venture capitalists are predominantly white men who in turn mostly fund companies started and run by other men. The venture capital industry has resisted calls to increase the number of women and minorities in its ranks and to fund more companies started by women and minorities. Observers say hidden or unconscious bias from people in position of power who hire from their immediate circles rather than casting a wider net is largely responsible for the gender and racial gap in venture capital. Patterns have emerged over time. White and Asian men have become the stereotypical image of a Silicon Valley engineer or entrepreneur and therefore are more likely to get funded. Venture capital firms hire successful entrepreneurs and executives as partners. Venture capital, like the broader technology industry, is slowly responding to growing social and economic pressure to change — and with good reason, Wadhwa said. As high-tech companies serve an increasingly diverse and global marketplace, historically underrepresented groups are becoming key to future growth in the sector, he said. Venture capitalists have begun to realize they risk becoming dangerously out of touch with the majority of consumers, he said. "The venture capital system is producing lower returns than the stock markets because you've got people investing in people just like themselves," he said. "If these firms don't have any women, African Americans or Latinos, how can they understand what companies to build and invest in?" Just a tiny percentage of venture capitalists are black or Hispanic. And women are not even holding their ground in venture capital firms; they are losing it. A recent study from Babson College shows that the proportion of women partners in U.S. venture capital firms declined to 6% in 2014 from 10% in 1999. "I am always the only black person at any pitch, any event or any meeting period," said Richard Kerby, a senior associate with Venrock. That lack of diversity puts women and minorities in Silicon Valley at a distinct disadvantage, perpetuating the problem, Kerby said. Silicon Valley is awash in war stories from women and minorities who have tried and failed to get funding from venture capital firms. A report in 2010 by CB Insights found that fewer than 1% of venture capital-backed Internet companies were founded by African Americans. Babson College survey found that 2.7% of the 6,517 companies that received venture funding from 2011 to 2013 had a female CEO. "The whole venture game is relationship based," Kerby said. "Black people are not friends with and do not have 50-year-old white men in their networks, so they are not going to have access to firms to hear a pitch, let alone write a check." Kapor says venture capitalists tell him all the time that they are "color blind" when funding companies. He's not sure they are ready to let go of a deeply rooted sense that Silicon Valley is a meritocracy. "At this point, doing something is almost obligatory given the numbers in venture capital are even worse than in the tech industry. Not doing anything would be seen as a public relations disaster," Kapor said. "The real question is: Are they going to do something substantive and is there a real willingness to re-examine their fundamental assumptions? The burden is really on the venture capital community to show and demonstrate in a substantive way they are serious about this."]]> 7795 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> A tree shaker and a jelly maker try to fix tech http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/a-tree-shaker-and-a-jelly-maker-try-to-fix-tech/ Sat, 06 Dec 2014 22:10:13 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7797 NAACP head Ben Jealous, 41, wants to change the industry from the inside, embedding himself as a venture capitalist with Oakland’s Kapor Capital and the Kapor Center for Social Impact. He serves on boards, networks with founders, and funds companies in a bid to steer more people of color into the tech world. Meanwhile the Rev. Jesse Jackson, 73, is using his trademark bullhorn activism to attack an industry that is two-thirds male and overwhelmingly white and Asian. He uses his media savvy to publicly shame companies, and he hints at calling for a boycott of the products that have made Silicon Valley one of the wealthiest regions of the country. Their approaches match a metaphor Jackson has previously used to describe vital players in any social movement. Jackson is the “tree shaker,” who agitates an entrenched institution. Jealous is the “jelly maker,” who picks up the fallen fruit and transforms it into something a wider audience can enjoy. “I have chosen to cross the threshold from being tree shaker to jelly maker,” Jealous said. “But I also understand that tree shaking is important to the jelly-making process. And Rev. Jesse Jackson has done an effective job of adding volume to lots of other people’s ongoing, long-standing complaints at just the right moment.” Keynote speaker On Thursday at Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters, Jealous was the keynote speaker at a fundraiser for a Kapor Center for Social Impact program aimed at helping youths of color get involved in tech. The event was co-sponsored by Google and other tech firms, which have been criticized for poor records of hiring people of color and women. But Jealous didn’t try to shame the executives from Google, Twitter or Yahoo in the audience. Instead, he appealed to their business sense, saying America will not remain competitive if its workforce does not include ideas from people of all backgrounds. “Let us stay uncomfortable with how the demographics of our great industry in this great valley would seem to Martin Luther King if he walked through the offices right now,” Jealous said. “Hell, yes!” somebody yelled from the back of the room. Exemplifying Jealous’ insider approach is the way he has used his position on the board of PayNearMe, a Sunnyvale startup that wants to help people without credit cards shop online. PayNearMe was struggling to navigate the regulatory thicket of financial services, said Freada Kapor Klein, a partner of Kapor Capital, which has invested in the company. Jealous tapped an African American NAACP colleague, Jotaka Eaddy, to lead PayNearMe’s government relations team. “On multiple levels here we have transformed the ecosystem,” Kapor Klein said. “We’re introducing diversity in tech through the board level, through the senior management level, and Jotaka is learning about how important these kinds of services are for people from her community.” Kapor Klein said it’s an example of how “Ben is working the inside game for a company whose very purpose is to help the disenfranchised.” Jackson and Jealous professed great admiration for each other — Jealous worked on Jackson’s 1988 presidential campaign — but they aren’t coordinating. “I am not looking to join the boards of those companies,” Jackson said. Looking for 'leaks’ Jealous, who left the NAACP last year after turning around the flagging civil rights organization, doesn’t believe Silicon Valley lives up to its aspirations of meritocracy. He wants to see the tech world consider applicants who didn’t go to top schools like Stanford. Early next year, the Kapor Center for Social Impact will release interactive graphics showing the “leaks” in the science and technology education pipeline — where low-income and minority candidates fall off the path to tech. The reports also aims to highlight which educational approaches work and which don’t. In a way, Jackson is also focusing on data — or the lack of it. His camp sends press releases almost weekly calling out a tech firm for its demographics, from the board of directors down to the engineers. His group also calls out tech firms for not releasing detailed breakdowns of their workforces. Jackson’s operatives buy shares of stock in the offending companies so they can gain access to stockholder meetings and blast the companies publicly for their lack of diversity. These activist tactics may be decades old, but the media attention they’ve helped to stir over the past year has jarred loose information from valley firms that had not been previously released. Jackson to speak Jackson will step inside the valley’s gates Wednesday to lead a discussion at Intel’s Santa Clara headquarters where 20 tech companies will explain their plans to hire more people of color and women. Some tech leaders are listening to their message. At the fundraiser Jealous spoke at Thursday at Twitter, Janet Van Huysse, the company’s vice president of diversity and inclusion, said, “Tech companies, as everyone in this room knows, have really struggled to build a truly diverse workforce. And Twitter is no exception.” Jealous’ new employer is building a relationship with Twitter. Kapor Klein has visited Twitter several times and offered suggestions on how to diversify the firm’s recruiting and promotion process. Last fall, Twitter conducted several experiments in which it masked the names and gender pronouns of applicants seeking in-house promotions. Though the sample size of the results were small, Van Huysse said they were encouraging enough to try elsewhere in the company. Van Huysse and several other Twitter employees will also attend Jackson’s summit Wednesday in Santa Clara, hoping to learn more. “This is such a multifaceted problem for us to solve,” Van Huysse said, “that both play a role.”]]> 7797 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> The Kapors: A tech power couple to the powerless http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/the-kapors-a-tech-power-couple-to-the-powerless/ Sun, 14 Dec 2014 22:12:15 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7800 and stunningly un-diverse." Mitch throws down the gauntlet. "Look, in 2015 there will be a moment where (tech) CEOs will have to decide, 'Are we serious about this issue or are we not?'" he says. "It's possible people will turn away and nothing much will happen. That would be disappointing. But it's on them."]]> 7800 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Tech Innovators Help bring Health Care to Hard-to-Reach Consumers http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/tech-innovators-help-bring-health-care-to-hard-to-reach-consumers/ Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:14:53 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7802 7802 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Freada Kapor Klein: "Diversity" Isn't Just Gender; "Women" Aren't Just White http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/freada-kapor-klein-diversity-isnt-just-gender-women-arent-just-white/ Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:17:37 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7805 Several years ago, I interviewed a young STEM-focused African-American student, "Anita," for a scholarship program. Anita was the first in her family to pursue college, and when I asked what propelled her through her difficult Advanced Placement courses while caring for younger siblings and jugging part-time jobs in Oakland, she revealed a teacher's comment that cut her to the core but ironically spurred her forward. He'd told her that she wasn't college material and was likely to end up a prostitute like the other girls from her neighborhood.

In all the recent discussion about Silicon Valley's "man problem," too little attention has been given to the specific experiences of women such as Anita. Diversity seems to only apply to the affluent white women who attended the same schools and share social networks with the male founders. That's a huge problem. This fall, for the first time, students of color became the majority in American public schools. This is the workforce of the near future. A strict focus on gender, without looking at how race and ethnicity fundamentally change the dynamic, threatens to exacerbate the problem. Women of color experience gender bias and sexual harassment as do white women, often at higher rates and layered with racial stereotypes. Some of these may seem like relatively minor annoyances -- constantly being mistaken for the other Latina in the office, for example, or bias about hair, ethnic attire or accents. Others can be immediately career-jeopardizing. Women of color frequently are asked to represent their company at community events and recruiting fairs, taking them away from their workplace. In my research, employees often are passed over for promotion because their contributions aren't as visible as their counterparts, who were able to spend more time in the office focusing on their jobs.In recent years, the advancement of white women in the private sector has eclipsed that of people of color, regardless of gender. White women have been the largest beneficiaries of workplace affirmative action programs. In research conducted by the Level Playing Field Institute (LPFI), young women of color perceived race-based stereotypes as much more ominous barriers than those based on gender. These became more internalized by people of all backgrounds. It's no surprise that women of color tend to have a heightened sense of outsider status in Silicon Valley than their white counterparts. This has consequences. A 2007 Corporate Leavers Survey conducted by LPFI showed that white women are 1.5 times more likely than white men to leave the workplace due to the cumulative effect of subtle biases. People of color, regardless of gender, leave at more than 3.5 times that rate solely due to unfairness. It's time for tech leaders to absorb some of the lessons already learned in other professions. First, gender issues, while nuanced and complicated, tend to be easier to address than issues of race, so many companies are content to make gender parity the centerpiece of their diversity efforts. Also, simplistic approaches to tackling diversity -- putting policies on paper and trainings in place -- don't address problems as they come up on a case-by-case basis. To tackle Silicon Valley's gender problems, we must recognize that women aren't a monolithic group. Tech diversity will move forward when women from all backgrounds, as well as underrepresented men, work to understand how their experiences overlap and diverge. Anita and the thousands of girls like her deserve their shot.

Freada Kapor Klein is the co-chairwoman of the Kapor Center for Social Impact and the founder of the Level Playing Field Institute. She wrote this article for this newspaper.

]]>
7805 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Ben Jealous: Entrepreneurs have a role to play in solving our nation's problems. http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/ben-jealous-entrepreneurs-have-a-role-to-play-in-solving-our-nations-problems/ Sat, 20 Dec 2014 22:20:35 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7807
Too often, we behave as if our nation's biggest problems can be solved simply through charity — what we do with our free time and our extra money. However, a rising generation of young business leaders has recognized that some problems are so big that it will literally take all they have to help solve them. In doing so they are reviving an old American tradition: that of the social impact entrepreneur. The most inspiring stories my grandparents told me were about their own grandparents, who were born slaves but went on to found banks and small businesses and farming enterprises as part of their broader strategy for achieving social and economic equality. They were single minded about achieving social justice and dedicated the entirety of their minds, their hearts and their time to the cause. In my role as a partner at Kapor Capital, I am inspired daily by ambitious entrepreneurs who are similarly single minded about achieving big social goals: improving children's health, expanding good jobs and strengthening our education system. These are nontraditional activists who happen to be very good at math, science and business. And their ranks are growing in the mid-Atlantic. Regional startup WorkAmerica, which is also in the Kapor Capital portfolio, has come up with an innovative way to boost gainful employment, for example. They partner with community colleges to create "job-guaranteed courses." At Anne Arundel Community College, for example, WorkAmerica empowers students to apply for and receive a job guarantee from an employer before they pay for their welding or truck driving course. Thus they start the course knowing they will have a good-paying job when they finish. WorkAmerica's service costs the employer less than they usually spend to recruit a new worker. It costs the community college and its students nothing. The end product provides a social benefit for workers, employers, community colleges and our regional economy. It's also a promising business. Similarly, Maker's Row, a startup based in Brooklyn, is making it easier for entrepreneurs to get their products made in the USA. A handbag company, for example, can be connected online to a local button manufacturer and pattern designer. By linking domestic factories with entrepreneurs, co-founders Matthew Burnett and Tanya Menendez hope to spark a renaissance in domestic manufacturing and create thousands of new jobs here at home. As someone who has been a leader in some of our nation's largest volunteer-based organizations, I am always grateful to those who give a portion of their hard-earned money and their scarce free time to expand access to the American dream. But as my old pastor used to say, the success of any movement ultimately hinges on the willingness of people to give their work, their wealth and their wisdom. We are living in a time of declining economic mobility and stagnating educational progress. Fortunately, we are also living in a time of unprecedented innovation. From Baltimore to Brooklyn and beyond, we would be wise to pay attention to the lessons of our ancestors and to the power of many of our nation's most promising entrepreneurs to help solve our nation's biggest problems. Ben Jealous is partner at Kapor Capital and former president and CEO of the Baltimore-based NAACP. He currently serves as chairman of the Southern Elections Fund and as a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. His email is benjealous@kaporcenter.org.]]>
7807 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
How Oakland Is Becoming Northern California's Next Great Startup Hub http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/how-oakland-is-becoming-northern-californias-next-great-startup-hub/ Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:23:25 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7810 7810 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Joe Nocera: Silicon Valley’s Mirror Effect http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/joe-nocera-silicon-valleys-mirror-effect/ Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:26:07 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7813 “If meritocracy exists anywhere on earth, it is in Silicon Valley,” wrote David Sacks in an email to The Times’s Jodi Kantor.

Kantor was working on an article, published in The Times on Tuesday, about the Stanford class of 1994 — the class that graduated a year before Netscape went public, and, for all intents and purposes, started the Internet economy. She was exploring why the men in that class had done so much better in Silicon Valley than the women.

Sacks, meanwhile, was one of the most successful members of the class. At Stanford he wrote for The Stanford Review, “a conservative-libertarian campus newspaper,” where he befriended Peter Thiel, a fellow libertarian. Then, in 1998, Sacks, Thiel and a handful of others — overwhelmingly white and male — founded PayPal, which made them all very rich. Since then, the PayPal Mafia, as these men are known in Silicon Valley, have seeded companies, founded companies and sold companies — in effect, financing another generation of (mostly) young white men.

In the email, which Kantor posted on her Facebook page, Sacks described meritocracy as one of his “core values,” and noted that when he has hired and promoted women, it was because they were the top candidates. “I chose the best person for the job, I needed the best talent to win, and I wanted to foster a culture of excellence.”

Well, maybe. But, as Kantor pointedly asks in a short introduction to Sacks’s email, if Silicon Valley is truly a meritocracy, “why do mostly men prevail?”

This is a question that has become increasingly urgent. This summer, Jesse Jackson shamed a number of important Silicon Valley companies, including GoogleFacebookApple and LinkedIn, into publishing a breakdown of their employees by race and sex. The numbers are appalling — something the companies were forced to concede once the figures became public. At LinkedIn, 2 percent of the work force is black, and 4 percent is Hispanic. Google is 70 percent male, with 91 percent of its employees either white or Asian. Facebook: 69 percent male and 91 percent white or Asian. When it comes to leadership positions or board seats, the numbers are even worse. Can this really be the result of “meritocracy?”

There aren’t many women or African-Americans working in Silicon Valley who would agree. “Silicon Valley’s obsession with meritocracy is delusional,” Freada Kapor Klein, the co-chair of the Kapor Center for Social Impact, told The Los Angeles Times in May. “Unless someone wants to posit that intelligence is not evenly distributed across genders and race, there has to be some systemic explanation for what these numbers look like.” Her husband, Mitch Kapor, designed Lotus 1-2-3, the seminal spreadsheet program that helped to make the IBM PC famous, and he calls the reality of Silicon Valley’s hiring practices a “mirror-tocracy.”

In its December issue, Fast Company published two articles about being black in Silicon Valley that included a round-table discussion with a handful of African-American tech leaders. They talked partly about the cultural reasons that African-Americans have been underrepresented: It can be hard to take a big financial risk when you don’t have a safety net — like parents or friends with money — to fall back on if you fail. They note that so often, Silicon Valley executives only want to hire people who have graduated from certain schools, like Stanford or Harvard. Very few recruit from Clemson, even though, as Nicole Sanchez, a diversity consultant, told me, “Clemson graduates the most black computer science graduate students in the country.”

But what shines through most is the extent to which people in Silicon Valley exhibit “unconscious bias.” “The meritocratic glow of Silicon Valley is so frustrating,” said Kanyi Maqubela, a partner at The Collaborative Fund, during the Fast Company round table. “It creates a pass for people who use things like the ‘culture filter’ ” — such as sharing the same interests as others at the company. “What’s the culture filter?” he continued. “An easy excuse to be prejudiced.”

Fundamentally, people who create companies, with the attendant intensity and pressure, want to be around people like themselves. They tend to be more forgiving of those like themselves, too. One man Kantor mentions in her article — and several women mentioned to me when I was researching this column — is Keith Rabois. Another member of the PayPal Mafia, Rabois left his job at Square in January 2013 after sexual harassment allegations — which Rabois denied — were made by a former lover who also worked at the company. Within one month, Rabois had joined a venture capital firm. If a woman or an African-American had faced the same type of charges, would she or he have rebounded as quickly? It’s doubtful.

It is easy to understand the appeal of going into business with your friends — and then surrounding yourself with mirror images of yourself. But let’s at least not call it a meritocracy.

]]>
7813 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Few minorities in non-tech jobs in Silicon Valley, USA TODAY finds http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/few-minorities-in-non-tech-jobs-in-silicon-valley-usa-today-finds/ Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:28:09 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7815 7815 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Silicon Valley is trying to diversify, but strategies still lag http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Silicon-Valley-is-trying-to-diversify-but-6007005.php Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:36:46 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7823 Howard is one of many historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) at which Silicon Valley establishments have stepped up their game. Last fall, the Googler-in-Residence initiative began at Fisk, Morehouse, Spelman and Hampton. Facebook paid visits to those schools and others. Apple is in talks with several schools. ... So far, Silicon Valley’s diversity initiatives have focused on recruitment, not job training, which has historically been key in hiring and retaining more black, Latino and female employees. In the early 1960s, Pacific Telephone in California offered employees training in work-related skills, as well as things such as basic math and English, said Dobbin. Later, efforts at Bell Labs and IBM brought more minority candidates into management positions. “Companies like IBM and Bell Labs did make a huge investment,” said Freada Kapor Klein, founder of The Level Playing Field Institute, which helps minority applicants find jobs in tech. “They found talented kids, and they made sure they were prepared to succeed. We don’t have anything like that now, and it’s a big leak in the pipeline.” Companies also adjusted job requirements. For example, some employers forgave poor high school records or exam scores if a candidate displayed aptitude, recognizing that for economically disadvantaged candidates such measures might not accurately reflect potential. Dobbins points out that some even encouraged overlooking police records, since they could reflect police discrimination. Today’s Silicon Valley firms have proved less inclined to hire candidates who don’t fit an exact job description. When Google realized students at historically black colleges lacked the skills it sought in engineers, the company did not offer job training to help those applicants get up to Silicon Valley speed. Instead, the company partnered with the schools to revamp their curriculum. (Google said it eventually plans to start a pilot program that gives recent grads on-the-job training in software engineering.) ... Read the full article here]]> 7823 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> A program for getting moms back to work in tech http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/A-program-for-getting-moms-back-to-work-in-tech-6068896.php Fri, 06 Mar 2015 17:52:13 +0000 http://kaporcenter.org/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=7851 caught hold in other industries — Goldman Sachs started one several years ago, and in 2013, consulting firm McKinsey & Co. began reaching out to former female employees who had left to start families. Other companies take a different approach, trying to keep women from leaving in the first place by offering, for instance, flexible hours. Women often cite the difficulty of integrating work with family as the reason they leave (though some studies have shown that women are much more likely to leave because of sexism than motherhood). “Tech needs two major types of programs,” said Freada Kapor Klein, founder of the Level Playing Field Institute. “Those that efficiently build the skills that are in the highest demand, while providing child care and a living stipend; and those to combat bias of hiring managers and future teammates so that the moms will find a welcoming work environment.” ... read the full article here http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/A-program-for-getting-moms-back-to-work-in-tech-6068896.php]]> 7851 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Kapors Pledge $40 Million Investment in Tech Diversity http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/08/04/mitch-kapor-freada-kapor-klein-tech-diversity-40-million-investment-pledge-white-house-demo-day/31069481/ Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:42:47 +0000 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=8117 "Genius is evenly distributed across zip codes. Access and opportunity are not," Mitch Kapor said in a statement. "With this investment we're doubling down on tech diversity because it's good for individuals, communities and the economy as a whole." Read more at USA Today.]]> 8117 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> Oakland’s Kapors spend $40 million to help diversify tech world http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Oakland-s-Kapors-spend-40-million-to-help-6422693.php Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:44:37 +0000 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=8119 Oakland technology entrepreneurs and philanthropists Mitch Kapor and Freada Kapor Klein will spend $40 million over the next three years to help make Silicon Valley more diverse and inclusive, giving specifically to companies with leaders from underrepresented communities.Read more at the San Francisco Chronicle. ]]> 8119 0 0 0 ]]> ]]> East Bay tech power couple to give $40 million to make industry more diverse http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2015/08/mitch-kapor-freada-tech-diversity-philanthropy-40m.html Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:25:32 +0000 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=8120 East Bay tech power couple Mitch Kapor and his wife Freada Kapor Klein have pledged to give $40 million over three years to make the technology industry more diverse. The announcement was made at the first-ever White House Demo Day, which was held Tuesday.

The news comes as major technology companies and venture capital firms have come under increasing scrutiny for employing few women and minorities as well as for backing relatively few startups with women and minority founders.

Read more at San Francisco Business Times

]]>
8120 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Quinn: The Kapors raise the bar for tech diversity http://www.mercurynews.com/michelle-quinn/ci_28585592/quinn-kapors-raise-bar-when-it-comes-diversity Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:36:08 +0000 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=8121 The first ever White House Demo Day on Tuesday came with lots of announcements about what companies, government agencies and organizations are going to do to address the lack of diversity in the tech industry.

And that was wonderful. But one set of announcements from Mitch Kapor, one of the co-founders of Lotus, and his wife, Freada Kapor Klein, stood apart. The East Bay couple, who for years have been on the forefront of the issue of tech and diversity, said they will spend $40 million to address the structural inequities that make it hard for African-Americans and other groups to become successful tech entrepreneurs. Read more at the San Jose Mercury News]]>
8121 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>
Project Include Names Companies and VCs in First Diversity and Inclusion Cohort http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/press-coverage-posts/project-include-names-companies-and-vcs-in-first-diversity-and-inclusion-cohort/ Thu, 09 Jun 2016 20:07:32 +0000 http://79.170.40.53/kapor-center.com/wordpress/?post_type=press-coverage-posts&p=8382 11 Startups and 15 Venture Capital Firms will Set Diversity & Inclusion Metrics, Test Strategies, and Share Results

OAKLAND, CA (DATE) Eleven tech startups and 15 venture capital firms have been selected by Project Include to participate in an inaugural contingent to test best practices to build diverse and inclusive cultures. Known as Startup Include and VC Include respectively, the contingency represent the first steps in the Project Include initiative, which launched last month as a first-of-its-kind roadmap to promote comprehensive cultural change at tech companies and VC firms.

“The recommendations of Project Include were steeped in the best available research and tech experience, and we designed them to be actionable, effective and measurable to accelerate diversity and inclusion in tech,” said Ellen Pao, investor, entrepreneur and startup advisor. “Now we are incredibly excited to road test those recommendations with a group of companies working together to compare notes and share experiences real time.”

"People of color will soon be the majority in the US, and the new economy will look a lot different,” said Monique Woodard, Venture Partner at 500 Startups, which has joined VC Include. “Diversity isn't going to be a 'nice to have'; it's going to be imperative to our success as investors and the success of our portfolio companies. This initiative helps us find the data and act on it in a way that will make us more inclusive and thus more successful on both sides of the table."

The companies selected include: Airbnb, Asana, Clef, Managed by Q, Patreon, Periscope Data, Prek12Plaza, Puppet, Truss, Twilio, and Upserve. The venture capital firms include: 500 Startups, Blackbird, Cross Culture, Designer Fund, Homebrew, Impact, Kapor Capital, Lowercase, Lucas Point, Precursor, Reach, Scale, Trimantium, True, and Upfront.

“I’m thrilled to have Kapor Capital join VC Include,” said Freada Kapor Klein, Partner at Kapor Capital and Founder of the Level Playing Field Institute. “More than three-quarters of our portfolio companies have already signed our Founders Commitment to be proactive about creating inclusive workplace cultures. Their experiences will be an important part of this initiative and findings as well.”

More than 100 companies applied to become members of the inaugural cohort, and were selected based on a variety of criteria, including size, sector, geography, and commitment from the top.

"Startup Include is exciting because it ties to our vision for Asana building a diverse team," said Dustin Moskovitz, cofounder and CEO of Asana. "We share their values of inclusivity, comprehensiveness, and accountability. As a company, we strive to be the change we want to see in the workplace. And the workplace we want to see in this world is radically inclusive."

“The CEOs of each of these companies are personally committed to driving change and inclusivity over the next seven months, making it much more than just a pledge. That’s what makes Startup Include so unique and exciting,” said Tracy Chou, entrepreneur and formerly a Software Engineer at Pinterest. “We are driving change from the top down in a way that will be measuring intersectionality and inclusivity in a comprehensive way across the company.”

The Project Include Team specifically sought out smaller companies, between 25 and 2,500 employees, to join the initial contingent.

“We believe we can maximize impact by working with startups at a younger stage, rather than with larger, more established companies,” said Erica Joy Baker, Senior Engineer at Slack Technologies. “It’s a big challenge to retrofit an existing culture, so we’re working with companies to build in principles of diversity and inclusion from the start.”

Project Include plans to publicly release the aggregated data and findings from the contingency at periodic intervals, to help the entire tech ecosystem benefit from the findings of what is working and what isn’t.

“Transparency has been a cornerstone of our recommendations from the start,” said Y-Vonne Hutchinson, founder of ReadySet. “We are going to test our recommendations and fine tune them as we learn more. At the same time our model allows CEOs to share experiences and learn from each other as they begin to put the recommendations into practice.”

In addition to the best available research, Project Include recommendations were based on the real life experiences of its eight founders in the tech sector.

“Together, the Project Include founders bring 150 years of collective experience to this initiative, and we are an incredibly diverse team,” said Laura I. Gomez, Founder and CEO at Atipica. “Inclusivity goes far beyond just gender. The specific experiences of women of color in tech have shaped our understanding of the problem and inform our solutions.”

The ten companies represent a range of tech sectors, from consumer platform and crowdfunding to enterprise software and big data.

“We very specifically included a number of impact companies in this initial contingency--companies whose products are helping to create change,” said bethanye McKinney Blount, Co-Founder and CEO at Cathy Labs. “We believe that diversity and inclusion will result in better products and technologies that themselves, in turn, will be an important part of diversifying the ecosystem.”

“I don’t think the tech industry has seen a diversity initiative quite like this before,” said Susan Wu, entrepreneur and angel investor. “It’s research-based and metrics-driven, and as a team we’re ready to pivot our recommendations based on empirical evidence. I'm excited we have both startups and VC funds committed to these programs -- these communities need to work together to drive change.”

###

Startups include:

  • Airbnb: Airbnb is a trusted online community marketplace for people to list, discover, and book unique accommodations around the world.

  • Asana: Asana makes a fast-growing work tracking app for teams, so they can spend less time manually tracking work and more time on getting more done and achieving results. Other collaboration apps like files (Dropbox, Box) and messaging (Slack, HipChat) integrate with Asana to help teams track their work better together. Asana is one of Fast Company's 2016 Most Innovative Companies.

  • Clef: Clef is using two-factor authentication to build a secure standard of identity for businesses to replace passwords, allowing users to have an authentic and personal relationship with the technology they use. Our core values and our employee handbook guide our strategies and individual actions so that we create a company whose character is as radical as its product.

  • Managed by Q: The platform for office management that makes it easy to run an office, just raised $25M from Google Ventures and Kapor Capital for a total of over $40M in funding.

  • Patreon: Patreon is changing the way art is valued. We provide creators the platform to foster their community of fans while getting an ongoing revenue stream to keep making awesome things.

  • Periscope Data: Periscope Data is a platform for data analysts that lets you run, save and share analyses of billions of data rows in seconds.

  • Puppet: The leading platform for delivering and operating constantly modern software – no matter where it runs.

  • Prek12Plaza: Closing the achievement gap for at-risk students.

  • Truss: Tech consultancy using infrastructure and operations expertise to solve complex engineering problems. Truss was part of the core team that saved Healthcare.gov.

  • Twilio: Developers and businesses use Twilio to make communications relevant and contextual by embedding messaging, voice, and video capabilities directly into their software applications.

  • Upserve: One of the largest and fastest­-growing companies in the restaurant technology space, over 6,000 restaurants use Upserve to manage more than 20 million meals per month, unlocking the power of their menu, workforce and guest habits to help optimize every decision.

 

VCs include:

  • 500 Startups: A global venture capital seed fund and startup accelerator based in Silicon Valley founded by Dave McClure and Christine Tsai. 500 Startups has invested in 1,500 startups that come from 60+ countries with a team of 125 people in 20+ countries speaking over 25 languages.

  • Blackbird Ventures and Startmate Accelerator: Australian VC fund and accelerator investing in technology companies that want to be the best in the world, not just the best in Australia. We love backing founders from diverse backgrounds who are doing their life’s work.

  • Cross Culture Ventures: Global VC firm founded by Troy Carter, Marlon Nichols and Trevor Thomas. Investing in technology companies that “fuel shifts in cultural trends and consumer behaviors within an increasingly diverse global marketplace.”

  • Designer Fund: The first seed-stage fund focused on startups founded by designers. It builds and educates design teams at partner companies, connects experienced designers with top startups for new career opportunities, and produces events and resources to share best practices with the design community.

  • Homebrew: Seed stage venture capital fund, co-founded by Satya Patel and Hunter Walk, providing capital and operational assistance to entrepreneurs enabling the Bottom Up Economy.

  • Impact Investment Group: A multi-asset impact funds manager. Launching Giant Leap -- Australia’s first VC Fund which is 100% dedicated to investing in exceptional, rapidly scaling, impact businesses.

  • Kapor Capital: Founded by Mitch Kapor and Freada Klein Kapor and based in Oakland. “At Kapor Capital we believe in the power of transformative ideas and diverse teams. We are an Oakland-based fund that understands that startup companies have the ability to transform entire industries and to address urgent social needs as they do so.”

  • Lowercase Capital: Founded by Chris Sacca. “We invest in startups, acquire later stage companies, and advise businesses and funds of all sizes on strategy and execution.”

  • Lucas Point Ventures: Active investor in and advisor to early stage companies. The majority of portfolio companies have women founders or co-founders and CEOs.

  • Precursor Ventures: Charles Hudson’s “pre-seed” fund “investing in strong teams in the business to business and business to consumer software markets.”

  • Reach Capital: Co-founded by Jennifer Carolan and Shauntel Poulson. “Seeding the most inspirational, uplifting and engaging educational tools which help educators and families realize children’s full potential.“

  • Scale Investors: Scale is an Australian female focused Angel network. 100 Scale Angels have invested almost $5m in 10 women led businesses since 2013. Trimantium: Based in Asia Pacific,

  • Trimantium Capital: An impact investor in technology businesses ready for high-growth in large markets. They build innovative and profitable businesses that also change the world by empowering consumers, creating choice, building awareness and generating wellness.

  • True Ventures: Co-founded by Jon Callaghan and Phil Black in 2005. “We invest in entrepreneurship that encompasses all walks of life, and believe in the democratization of innovation as a powerful force for global good.”

  • Upfront Ventures: The largest and longest-running VC firm in Southern California, investing in businesses that are technology led and coming from various backgrounds across technology sectors as entrepreneurs, operators, and investors.
]]>
8382 0 0 0 ]]> ]]>